Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You read that right. I got taller tires and now I'm rubbing on my upper control arms at full lock. So today I took my truck to a tire shop because of a slow leak. Turns out I had a nail in the sidewall so I decided to bite the bullet and get the taller tires I wanted from the beginning. I'm running the stock chrome 20's (see my gallery) which came with 275/55/20 Goodyear SR-A's. I upgraded to a 275/60/20 Michelin AT2. Now I know tires vary by manufacturer but by numbers alone my new tires should only be taller and not wider. Even with some variance by manufacturer I can't believe I'm rubbing on my upper control arms after reading so many posts where everyone says they have no rub at this size. The rub is on the front bumper side of the UCA against the inner sidewall of the tire. I have a leveling kit equivalent to the ready lift with a spacer at both the top and bottom. I did have my upper control arms replaced via recall about 2-3 weeks after my truck came in due to some concern about the quality of welds on the UCA's for a short run of trucks. The run was so short that my truck is the only one my dealer has had to perform the recall on. So clearly my new "taller" tires are wider as well. Is anyone else seeing this issue when going to the 275/60/20's? I wonder if those new UCA's stick out any farther than the originals.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Anyone else experience this by just going a size taller? I realize its probably a little fatter but I've seen a lot of others say no rub at all with a 275/60/55.

Posted

They shouldn't be rubbing the UCA unless they're a good bit wider. Those tires are only a half inch taller so there's zero chance your old tires would somehow clear the UCA and these wouldn't. The only thing I can figure is that maybe your alignment is out of whack and the old tires probably rubbed too, or they're not actually hitting the UCA, and instead maybe a concrete edge of a driveway when pulling in or something similar.

Posted

I turned my wheel as far as it would go. I took the pics from inside the wheel well. You can see it almost touches and that's without hand pressure on the steering wheel. You can also see where the UCA rubs the tire at full lock. I'm going to add some air and see if that helps but I doubt it will.

 

9c2c36d9209b254afe3277de12036326.jpg

e008ac34fa00378db5d0d26619d91e54.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Posted

I got to thinking with the level pushing down slightly the angle probably brings the wheel in a little closer to the UCA. That combined with a taller sidewall bulging out is probably enough to cause it. I bet it wouldn't happen with stock suspension. Still going to add a little air and see what happens.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I got to thinking with the level pushing down slightly the angle probably brings the wheel in a little closer to the UCA. That combined with a taller sidewall bulging out is probably enough to cause it. I bet it wouldn't happen with stock suspension. Still going to add a little air and see what happens.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

Isn't this the reason many people have to use wheel spacers like BORA? Especially with the OEM wheels offset and a leveling kit?

 

Also found this on another thread:

 

 

The smallest spacer you can go without cutting studs is 1" IF you have factory wheels with "pockets" in the back the studs are 1.75", pockets are .75" deep.

 

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Edited by ChevyRoofer
Posted

 

Isn't this the reason many people have to use wheel spacers like BORA? Especially with the OEM wheels offset and a leveling kit?

 

Also found this on another thread:

 

 

I just know I read a ton of threads about tires and everyone always said a 275/60/20 would not rub and I never saw any mention of spacers. I'm not saying you're wrong. I just never saw it mentioned.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Posted

I just know I read a ton of threads about tires and everyone always said a 275/60/20 would not rub and I never saw any mention of spacers. I'm not saying you're wrong. I just never saw it mentioned.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

Are you sure they didn't have a stock suspension when they were increasing their tire size? I've seen that lots - I even did this tire upgrade when I had a 2014 - no problems with Michelin.

 

I really think this is only because of your 2.25" metal spacer level. If you don't want to take the 2.25" spacer out, I'd recommend wheel spacers or aftermarket UCA's.

Posted

 

Are you sure they didn't have a stock suspension when they were increasing their tire size? I've seen that lots - I even did this tire upgrade when I had a 2014 - no problems with Michelin.

 

I really think this is only because of your 2.25" metal spacer level. If you don't want to take the 2.25" spacer out, I'd recommend wheel spacers or aftermarket UCA's.

Or just avoid full lock, LOL.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Or just avoid full lock, LOL.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

Or install Bilstein 5100s in the front...probably cheaper and better ride than new UCAs.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Or install Bilstein 5100s in the front...probably cheaper and better ride than new UCAs.

I'm not sure how 5100s would solve the issue. They would still force the UCA into a more downward angle bringing the wheel closer in. Honestly it's not worth a lot of trouble for no more than it touches I just hadn't remembered anyone else mentioning it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Posted

I'm not sure how 5100s would solve the issue. They would still force the UCA into a more downward angle bringing the wheel closer in. Honestly it's not worth a lot of trouble for no more than it touches I just hadn't remembered anyone else mentioning it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

I was saying remove your 2.25" metal spacer and install Bilstein 5100 at the top setting. Roughly 1.85". This would leave your UCA at the correct angle and you'd have a better ride.

 

Do some light reading about different lifts/levels...very informative.

 

http://www.bilsteinus.com/fileadmin/user_upload/user_upload_us/pdfs/Bil_LevShks_WebArticle.pdf

Posted

I can tell you I have been dealing woth this for 2 months now. I went to a much more extreme on upgrade size with s 295/55/20 and had rub,So i don't like having this problem, I took to a chevy dealer who puts lots of after market wheels and tires. He could not explain it either. He has been having to make all kinds of mods to make lifts and tires work on trucks with Stamped arms.... Went to local 4wd off road parts and they advised need more off set to correct. So picked a wheel changed. This corrected the rub on a-frame, but just moved it to the sway bar. FInal solution was 285/55/20 with +18 offset wheels.

Have spoken to multiple LIft mfg and they are still trying to get a grip on the whole stamped arm issue... Lots of things that worked before don't work not with different ball joint geometry. I added a ready lift 2.25 to front, but really want a 4". Waiting on more lift companies to come up with 2wd spindle lifts before making that jump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...