Jump to content

Michelin LTX A/T2 vs LTX Defender M/S vs LTX Premier vs Hankook Dynapr


Matt_P

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks everyone for the very useful comments. Sounds like the LTX Defender is a great tire. With that said, anyone use the more passenger car oriented LTX Premier? I read a review on Tirerack of someone putting these tires on their Sierra and said the tire is great. Figured GM put touring tires (LS2) on our trucks stock, so if we want to keep that road feel, gas milage yet have a great performing tire maybe the LTX Premier is worth considering? The ratings on Tirerack are outstanding.

 

Link to the tires:

 

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Michelin&tireModel=Premier+LTX&partnum=755HR0PRLTX&vehicleSearch=true&fromCompare1=yes&autoMake=GMC&autoYear=2016&autoModel=Sierra%201500%204wd&autoModClar=Crew%20Cab

 

 

EDIT: Added LTX Premier to the thread title to help with people searching in the future. I didn't see the LTX Premiers discussed much since they are a relatively new tire. Will be interesting to see if people start using these on their trucks.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I put the Defenders on my truck. They're a great upgrade to the stock Goodyears. My tire dealer said that the Defenders are the same as the M/S2s, but built with a longer-lasting tread compound. I dont know about that but both tires do look the same to me. I've had the M/S2s on a previous vehicle. You can't go wrong with either one unless you really need an LT tire or if you want an off-road tire.

Posted

Thanks everyone for the very useful comments. Sounds like the LTX Defender is a great tire. With that said, anyone use the more passenger car oriented LTX Premier? I read a review on Tirerack of someone putting these tires on their Sierra and said the tire is great. Figured GM put touring tires (LS2) on our trucks stock, so if we want to keep that road feel, gas milage yet have a great performing tire maybe the LTX Premier is worth considering? The ratings on Tirerack are outstanding.

 

Link to the tires:

 

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Michelin&tireModel=Premier+LTX&partnum=755HR0PRLTX&vehicleSearch=true&fromCompare1=yes&autoMake=GMC&autoYear=2016&autoModel=Sierra%201500%204wd&autoModClar=Crew%20Cab

 

 

EDIT: Added LTX Premier to the thread title to help with people searching in the future. I didn't see the LTX Premiers discussed much since they are a relatively new tire. Will be interesting to see if people start using these on their trucks.

 

We have the LTX Premier on my Wife's Audi A6 and they are fantastic tires, however even new the tread depth on them is very shallow.

 

They only start out life at 8.5/32nd's tread depth. The LTX M/S starts at 12/32nds. for a 20" tire on our trucks. So looking at them they look like they are already worn even when brand new! They provide plenty of grip on my Wife's Audi in winter, they are still new however. When I look at them I think they are getting down there needing replacement, and yet I have to remind myself that they do not have much tread depth even new. So far so good with them, but as they wear how good they are remains to be seen. Not sure why they do not come with a greater tread depth, but I do love the Premier when new. Michelin makes the very best tires IMO, every time I try another brand I wonder why I did it and just didn't spring for the higher priced Michelin's. I've made up my mind to always get Michelin's from here on out when available. High priced but worth it.

Posted

I am surprised that this thread hasn't been moved to the tire section by now! Usually tire discussions get moved pretty quickly! I agree that Michelin Defenders are the best choice. I have been doing a lot of searching to find a comparable tire as Michelin has dropped the BSW choice from their most popular sizes. Michelin has been my only tire choice for the past twenty years and I am finding the search for an alternative quite overwhelming!

Posted

 

We have the LTX Premier on my Wife's Audi A6 and they are fantastic tires, however even new the tread depth on them is very shallow.

 

They only start out life at 8.5/32nd's tread depth. The LTX M/S starts at 12/32nds. for a 20" tire on our trucks. So looking at them they look like they are already worn even when brand new! They provide plenty of grip on my Wife's Audi in winter, they are still new however. When I look at them I think they are getting down there needing replacement, and yet I have to remind myself that they do not have much tread depth even new. So far so good with them, but as they wear how good they are remains to be seen. Not sure why they do not come with a greater tread depth, but I do love the Premier when new. Michelin makes the very best tires IMO, every time I try another brand I wonder why I did it and just didn't spring for the higher priced Michelin's. I've made up my mind to always get Michelin's from here on out when available. High priced but worth it.

 

 

I hear what you are saying about the tread depth on the LTX Premier. The local tire dealer showed me the LTX Defender, LTX Premier and Hankook Dynapro ATM and I also noticed the the tread depth of the LTX Premier looked very shallow. I would worry that a heavy truck would wear them out very quickly. I think I would go with the Defender on my truck, but would get the Premier on a crossover SUV.

 

I also agree on the Michelins, I ran them on our previous car (MDX) and I had two sets on my BMW (PS2 and PSS) and all three sets performed great.

Posted

I am surprised that this thread hasn't been moved to the tire section by now! Usually tire discussions get moved pretty quickly! I agree that Michelin Defenders are the best choice. I have been doing a lot of searching to find a comparable tire as Michelin has dropped the BSW choice from their most popular sizes. Michelin has been my only tire choice for the past twenty years and I am finding the search for an alternative quite overwhelming!

 

Oops...didn't realize there was a tire forum!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

$70 instant rebate at Costco is back for Michelin tires, which I missed by a week in July!

 

Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk

Posted

$70 instant rebate at Costco is back for Michelin tires, which I missed by a week in July!

 

Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk

 

 

I was able to get the $70 rebate! Just had the Defenders put on last week. So far they are very smooth on the road, but not as responsive on turn-in as compared to the LS2's. Haven't had rain/snow yet to test them out in the wet weather.

Posted

If you have Discount Tire where you live, chances are they have the rebate as well and will be able to beat Costco's price.

Posted

If you have Discount Tire where you live, chances are they have the rebate as well and will be able to beat Costco's price.

I have found it easy to beat Costco's tire prices where I live, but the install price is harder to beat! I also find their regular, free tire rotations more convenient! Their tire choices are limited if you are not a Michelin fan!

Posted

Price is good enough for me at Costco and their services and convenience is perfect, zero complaints.

 

And I do agree about these not being as sharp on turn in but it's to be expected with the deeper tread and being so new. I'm coming from very worn down latitude tours which were very responsive, especially since they looked like super sports towards the end!

 

Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk

Posted

And it should go without saying that rain performance is exceptional. Within a week of being mounted they were used for a road trip with torrential rain and muddy trails, all with great confidence. Hopefully they'll see snow and ice at least once this upcoming winter.

 

Sent from my SM-G360V using Tapatalk

Posted

Had LTX Defender M/S installed 2 weeks ago (in size 275/65-18). So far, truck has been ran on highway in both dry and pouring rain and driven up a couple inclines on the property over mowed wet grass (well weeds actually). Personally, I think anything except a dedicated off-road tire will be a disappointment if what you really need is s dedicated off-road tire. Defender M/S is quiet and provides confident handling.

Posted

I just put Defender LTX/MS on this am 275/60/20. They rode great on the way home but that is my only sample size at this point.

Posted

I just put Defender LTX/MS on this am 275/60/20. They rode great on the way home but that is my only sample size at this point.

 

 

Curious why you went with the 275/60/20 instead of the 275/55/20 tires? I agree they do ride great. I am a couple weeks into owning them and still notice the better ride quality compared to the stock LS2 tires.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...