Jump to content

Boosted GEN V's

07Softail

By 07Softail
in Engines & Drivetrain

Recommended Posts

JayIPT Enthusiast

JayIPT

Posted
Posted

I just paid $4600 for a new in the box Magnuson TVS1900 and I think the vette supercharger is smaller and would not be worth it in my opinion. There is another guy on here with a sweet deal on a new Maggie Jvanwinkle2 $4600 also new in box

 

RT

Yeah, I got that supercharger from JVanWinkle.

Now I need to figure out what my finished set up will be. Cam, exhaust, intake, boost. Daily driver. I just came out of a 06 gto so the 5.3 feels a little sluggish.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
want a 2500HD Enthusiast

want a 2500HD

Posted
Posted

2015+ Z06 SC is only a 1.7L and already spins at 20,000RPM (MAX'D OUT). Id recommend 2.3L. I wonder if a LSA SC would work (09-14 CTS-V and Camaro ZL1) Jay...why did you end up choosing the 1.9L for the 5.3? because of the smaller displacement compared to the 6.2L?

Dnt Senior Enthusiast

Dnt

Posted
Posted

Has anyone ever thought about putting the supercharger from the new z06 on their 6.2l yet?

Sounds interesting a proven factory setup would be awesome. So does the $4,400.00 include everything needed to make it work properly on a Sierra 6.2?

07Softail Senior Enthusiast

07Softail

Posted
  • Author
Posted

2015+ Z06 SC is only a 1.7L and already spins at 20,000RPM (MAX'D OUT). Id recommend 2.3L. I wonder if a LSA SC would work (09-14 CTS-V and Camaro ZL1) Jay...why did you end up choosing the 1.9L for the 5.3? because of the smaller displacement compared to the 6.2L?

Maybe because it was $4000 New in the box i'm guessing. Compared to $6000 New in the box. You can pulley these down and make good power.

 

RT

07Softail Senior Enthusiast

07Softail

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sounds interesting a proven factory setup would be awesome. So does the $4,400.00 include everything needed to make it work properly on a Sierra 6.2?

More bang for the dollar with Magnuson without a doubt.

 

RT

JayIPT Enthusiast

JayIPT

Posted
Posted

2015+ Z06 SC is only a 1.7L and already spins at 20,000RPM (MAX'D OUT). Id recommend 2.3L. I wonder if a LSA SC would work (09-14 CTS-V and Camaro ZL1) Jay...why did you end up choosing the 1.9L for the 5.3? because of the smaller displacement compared to the 6.2L?

The price was right. Definitely. I have some headers coming and im trying to decide on a cam. With those things and the 1.9, I will have a fun ride. I figure the total of those parts still keep me around the price of a 6500 dollar supercharger.

 

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
14rcsb Enthusiast

14rcsb

Posted
Posted

I did. Currently 30k miles with boost on 5-10 psi. Their just like any other motor. GET A GOOD TUNE and don't get greedy with timing or dyno numbers you will be just fine.

post-150876-0-66941700-1476974052_thumb.jpg

post-150876-0-66941700-1476974052_thumb.jpg

post-150876-0-66941700-1476974052_thumb.jpg

post-150876-0-66941700-1476974052_thumb.jpg

davidio840 Enthusiast

davidio840

Posted
Posted

I did. Currently 30k miles with boost on 5-10 psi. Their just like any other motor. GET A GOOD TUNE and don't get greedy with timing or dyno numbers you will be just fine.

 

Jealous!!

14rcsb Enthusiast

14rcsb

Posted
Posted

Twins are the best

Twins are useless for under 1000 whp. It's been proven time and time again. Not knocking anybody but almost every single turbo setup I see has a turbo that could be spec'd better. 75% of people will simply never use say a s475 or equivalent on a daily driver. So instead of getting a huge turbo with a huge exhaust wheel that will never be used to its potential, use something smaller like I do. Spools instantly and isn't far off from a few twin setups I've seen, not all but some.

 

To each their own but when setup correctly a single will run right with twins.

Wreckedandwasted Enthusiast

Wreckedandwasted

Posted
Posted

I am at 1000 h.p and going to 1200+, you do the math 700 rwhp thru automatic trans,transfer case on a mustang dyno,and yes I use them both of them everyday just because I can and it makes me happy.

truckguy82 Senior Enthusiast

truckguy82

Posted
Posted

Twins are useless for under 1000 whp. It's been proven time and time again. Not knocking anybody but almost every single turbo setup I see has a turbo that could be spec'd better. 75% of people will simply never use say a s475 or equivalent on a daily driver. So instead of getting a huge turbo with a huge exhaust wheel that will never be used to its potential, use something smaller like I do. Spools instantly and isn't far off from a few twin setups I've seen, not all but some.

 

To each their own but when setup correctly a single will run right with twins.

Only difference between twins and single is piping and convenience of one or the other. Power makes no difference.

 

Unless your running them sequential and one turbo is designed to spool the other. Nobody does that in the aftermarket though.

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • rdonarski
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By rdonarski · Posted

      This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • PBNB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By PBNB · Posted

      How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...