Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Did you use the advanced or easy tune? Advanced tune should allow you to access AFM and throttle boost. When you go through advanced you select your canned engine (91 or 87) and transmission tunes (firm,hard) then you should be able to select modify tune. This is where you can access more advanced settings for the engine and transmission.

Thank you for the comment! I actually installed an advanced tune last night and was able to find how to modify parameters. Diablo 91+ tune, Turned off AFM, speed limiter, firm shift, 5% throttle boost. Drives MUCH better now!

My speedo is off still but in the other direction. Apparently putting in the measurement the manufacturer states doesnt correct your speedo.

Anyone find the sweet spot for 275/70/18 tires?

They are 33.25" tires, but putting that in results in the speedo being 4-5% high rather than 4-5% low like it was before.

Guess I need to split the difference.

  • Like 2
Posted

Thank you for the comment! I actually installed an advanced tune last night and was able to find how to modify parameters. Diablo 91+ tune, Turned off AFM, speed limiter, firm shift, 5% throttle boost. Drives MUCH better now!

My speedo is off still but in the other direction. Apparently putting in the measurement the manufacturer states doesnt correct your speedo.

Anyone find the sweet spot for 275/70/18 tires?

They are 33.25" tires, but putting that in results in the speedo being 4-5% high rather than 4-5% low like it was before.

Guess I need to split the difference.

 

The tires spec out to 33.25 but that is the tire alone without any load. Try measuring the tires from the ground up (while mounted, thus under load/weight of the truck) and using that measurement in the device? As that would be the true height of the tire that is rotating under the truck?

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you for the comment! I actually installed an advanced tune last night and was able to find how to modify parameters. Diablo 91+ tune, Turned off AFM, speed limiter, firm shift, 5% throttle boost. Drives MUCH better now!

My speedo is off still but in the other direction. Apparently putting in the measurement the manufacturer states doesnt correct your speedo.

Anyone find the sweet spot for 275/70/18 tires?

They are 33.25" tires, but putting that in results in the speedo being 4-5% high rather than 4-5% low like it was before.

Guess I need to split the difference.

I did 32.5 for my ko2s. It's only under by 1 mph.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I did 32.5 for my ko2s. It's only under by 1 mph.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the tips guys! Are your ko2's 275/70/18?

I was thinking 32.75 might be about right.

Posted

Thanks for the tips guys! Are your ko2's 275/70/18?

I was thinking 32.75 might be about right.

Yup that's the size. And actually I was wrong. At 70 mph the truck reads 71. So I'm over one.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Just putting the correct tire size didn't work for you guys?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Just putting the correct tire size didn't work for you guys?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Are you referring to putting in the actual tire dimensions as 275/70/18? or the advertised height?

 

I tried the advertised height (33.25) and it was way off.

I finally found 32.35 seemed to be almost dead on.

 

This time that i changed the speedo i also bumped the throttle boost up to 8% from 5%... I think i'm going to bump it back down, but not sure. It is a TON OF FUN to drive like this, but it is visibly dropping the average MPG. the 5% was good already, so i may sacrifice that tad bit and get some mpg back... But i'm going to finish this tank of gas the way it is just to see. At 70MPH yesterday i was getting about 22-25mpg though. Which was really nice compared to the 17-18 i usually get.

  • Like 1
Posted

Are you referring to putting in the actual tire dimensions as 275/70/18? or the advertised height?

 

I tried the advertised height (33.25) and it was way off.

I finally found 32.35 seemed to be almost dead on.

 

This time that i changed the speedo i also bumped the throttle boost up to 8% from 5%... I think i'm going to bump it back down, but not sure. It is a TON OF FUN to drive like this, but it is visibly dropping the average MPG. the 5% was good already, so i may sacrifice that tad bit and get some mpg back... But i'm going to finish this tank of gas the way it is just to see. At 70MPH yesterday i was getting about 22-25mpg though. Which was really nice compared to the 17-18 i usually get.

Yea I put in the tire size. I'm assuming it's as accurate as it was with the factory tires at this point. It seems pretty darn close compared to GPS but I'm running 275/60R20 Duratracs (measures 33.0" according to good year)

 

My mpg took a hit because I'm running 20% throttle boost. I just love how little pedal input I need when I'm on the highway. Never realized how tired my foot gets on the highway until I tried it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Yea I put in the tire size. I'm assuming it's as accurate as it was with the factory tires at this point. It seems pretty darn close compared to GPS but I'm running 275/60R20 Duratracs (measures 33.0" according to good year)

 

My mpg took a hit because I'm running 20% throttle boost. I just love how little pedal input I need when I'm on the highway. Never realized how tired my foot gets on the highway until I tried it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Nice. I will have to try that next time i readjust the tune.

I am thinking I may try the 87 tune with the same settings and see how it does, since that is easier to get around here than 91.

Most gas stations around here only have 90.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Wanted to add an update with my diablo intune I2. I programmed the MPG booster and disabled the upshift torque management and added 5% to throttle boost. I took the Burban on a 1100 mile trip this weekend and unfortunately fought a 10-15 mph head or sidewind at all times. It was nearly all interstate driving at 80 - 85 mph. About 25 miles were in town and I averaged 19.8 mpg. Highway only I was up to 22 at some times. Before the MPG booster tune I guarantee in these conditions I could only expect 16-17 mpg overall average. This tuner really makes a difference and the throttle response is much better as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

Wanted to add an update with my diablo intune I2. I programmed the MPG booster and disabled the upshift torque management and added 5% to throttle boost. I took the Burban on a 1100 mile trip this weekend and unfortunately fought a 10-15 mph head or sidewind at all times. It was nearly all interstate driving at 80 - 85 mph. About 25 miles were in town and I averaged 19.8 mpg. Highway only I was up to 22 at some times. Before the MPG booster tune I guarantee in these conditions I could only expect 16-17 mpg overall average. This tuner really makes a difference and the throttle response is much better as well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Have you noticed any difference in shifting with upshift TM off? I originally turned upshift TM off but noticed I would occasionally get a weird shift. Would be really firm one time and soft the next. Ended up turning upshift TM back on and shifting is more consistent now. I also added 15% throttle boost and I really like that. Don't have to press the throttle so much to get the vehicle to accelerate. Might even bump it up to 20%.

Posted

I have my Silverado 5.3 throttle boost set to 20%. Throttle response is excellent, and where it should be stock in my opinion. However with the 20% boost I have noticed definite decline in mileage and the trans tends to stay in higher gear around town. Engine stays 1500-2000 rpm just coasting down hill or slower traffic because of the high throttle input. I am going to back the boost off because it is kind of annoying having the engine at higher rpm at light cruise. I can punch the throttle and make it upshift, but still annoying.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I love that this thread continues to develop.

 

So again I adjusted the tune to try to better my gas mileage. Currently running the 91 advanced with AFM off, TM off, and throttle boost at 0%. I haven't noticed any rough shifts yet and I've been running this now for about two months. MPG is still just ok at 15-17 mixed. Highway I'm just breaking 20.

 

The TM being off doesn't do as much as I thought it would. Just better response off the line. I don't beat the truck so for now I'm going to leave it. I need to do an excel spreadsheet so I can remember this stuff. I wish the Diablo allowed you to just download the latest tune to your laptop so you can view/remember it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I love that this thread continues to develop.

 

So again I adjusted the tune to try to better my gas mileage. Currently running the 91 advanced with AFM off, TM off, and throttle boost at 0%. I haven't noticed any rough shifts yet and I've been running this now for about two months. MPG is still just ok at 15-17 mixed. Highway I'm just breaking 20.

 

The TM being off doesn't do as much as I thought it would. Just better response off the line. I don't beat the truck so for now I'm going to leave it. I need to do an excel spreadsheet so I can remember this stuff. I wish the Diablo allowed you to just download the latest tune to your laptop so you can view/remember it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

Here is a post I made in another Diablo thread regarding TM:

 

The first time I tuned with the inTune i2 I turned upshift TM (torque management) off and went with the firm shift setting. While the shifts were firmer, they were randomly firmer. Every so often the 1-2 shift would be really firm and then sometimes soft. After doing more research on upshift TM I decided to turn it back on (stock setting). I think the shifting is more consistent now. Partial throttle shifts are a little more firm then stock and WOT shifts are firm but not harsh. This is what Mike on the DIablosport forum said about upshift TM:

"we often recommend leaving the upshift abuse mode TM enabled as it can lead to sloppy shift feel when disabled, as you may have discovered. TM on the engine side is already disabled in the tunes."

"this is TM specific to when the trans upshifts in 'abuse mode' meaning heavy throttle/WOT, leaving it on allows the pcm/tcm to make the shift smoother, turning it off removes any timing/throttle adjustments to smooth out the tune."

It sounds like there are two TM settings. One on the engine side and one on the transmission side. The engine TM is turned off in the canned ECM settings (87 or 91 tune). The transmission TM (upshift TM setting) is the only user selectable TM option and is under the advanced TCM settings. I plan to leave it on as I think it feels better and really don't see any reason to turn it off as I don't think it affects throttle response (power to the ground). Appears it simply pulls timing between shifts and turning it off can potentially cause slopping shifting.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,993 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...