Jump to content

Mpg questions with lift, wheels,tires

Sierrasle

By Sierrasle
in Tires, Wheels & TPMS

Recommended Posts

Sierrasle New Member

Sierrasle

Posted
Posted

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 and I am planning on a zone 4.5 lift kit with 275/65r18 and 18x9 fuel maverick. Mpg is a big thing to me since I do all highway driving and was wondering how much mpg I will lose after the lift and bigger tires. Stock was 255/70r17. It's my first time on a forum, I will greatly appreciate whoever helps me out!

Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted

Welcome! Use the search feature and you will find a great deal of discussion on MPG with lifts, levels and larger tires. I think you will find a wide range of answers! The most significant factor, I believe, is the type of tire you choose. The size you are suggesting is pretty close to stock. If you choose a highway tire, the impact on MPG wouldn't be as noticeable as switching to an AT or MT tire. You are going from an overall wheel diameter of 31.1" to 32.1". The 1500's with the factory 18's have a diameter of 31.6" and 20's have a diameter of 31.9".

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Mpg is a big thing to me since I do all highway driving​.

 

Must not be very important or you would not be doing any mods. :happysad:

  • 3 weeks later...
Big Whiskey Senior Enthusiast

Big Whiskey

Posted
Posted

275/65/18 is a very conservative size for a leveled truck, let alone a truck with a 4.5" lift. MPG will probably drop 2-3 from completely stock, depending on your driving habits.

NoProblem Enthusiast

NoProblem

Posted
Posted

275/65/18 is a very conservative size for a leveled truck, let alone a truck with a 4.5" lift. MPG will probably drop 2-3 from completely stock, depending on your driving habits.

 

I share this opinion.

Rme2513 Enthusiast

Rme2513

Posted
Posted

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 and I am planning on a zone 4.5 lift kit with 275/65r18 and 18x9 fuel maverick. Mpg is a big thing to me since I do all highway driving and was wondering how much mpg I will lose after the lift and bigger tires. Stock was 255/70r17. It's my first time on a forum, I will greatly appreciate whoever helps me out!

the 275 6518 (32.1) is a small tire for a 4.5" lift want be much different then stock if you really wanna keep the MPGs go with a 20 wheel and get a p rated tire 275 60 20 is a 33 vs a 32 and it the same width the reason a say 20" wheel is there more opinions in p rated tires there are a few p rated 275 70 18 witch is a 33.2 but nothing aggressive the more aggressive the less the mpg and the more the tire weighs is a factor to I have a 3 inch lift with stock 265 65 18 still get 20 mpg with the 6.2 I'm going to go with 265 70 18 ( around 45 lbs ) p ratted witch is a 32.6 or LT 275 70 18 ( around 55 lbs ) witch is a 33.2 but much heavier tire if you that worried about mpgs id do a 3 " lift with 265 70 18 like myself hope this helps you some but it really comes down to what you want out of the truck looks or mpgs there not much happy medium when you start going big

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • carkhz316
      2006 Silverado HVAC sensor location in dashboard

      By carkhz316 · Posted

      Oh yes, someone is going to be certainly hitting up GM service/ support for a 20 year old truck.
    • Deadwood
      primary drive belt tensioner

      By Deadwood · Posted

      I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • Deadwood
      10L1000 anyone with High Mileage ? I hate Damocles....

      By Deadwood · Posted

      New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • swathdiver
      6 Speed vs 8 Speed

      By swathdiver · Posted

      At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • GMCustomerService
      Will not stay in Reverse

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...