Jump to content

How fast do you really drive?


Grumpy Bear

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I know I'm going to get in trouble I always been quite a rebel but I can't help it. Grumpy bear is lots of fun sometimes but reminds me of an ex father in law. Whenever he was around he dominated the room with conversation of stuff that was hard to understand, even for the many aggies that are in the family. Please GB dumb it down my head hurts. And (I think you put out some interesting stuff).

 

:dunno:Trouble?...not with me sport. I ain't like that. I don't hold a grudge. Darn things are way to heavy.

Posted

This is why I love forums. ALL OVER THE PLACE! :D

 

And now back to our regulary scheduled thread:

 

WP_20170308_17_36_25_Pro_zpscccpwnoa.jpg

 

Turns out to be only 32.68 average mph. I'd think it would be higher with what I would think is a majority of highway driving, but those remote starts after work, as well as slogging through snow drifts, can bring it down.

Posted

This is why I love forums. ALL OVER THE PLACE! :D

 

And now back to our regulary scheduled thread:

 

 

 

Turns out to be only 32.68 average mph. I'd think it would be higher with what I would think is a majority of highway driving, but those remote starts after work, as well as slogging through snow drifts, can bring it down.

 

Allot of hits for a half dozen data points. PROGRESS :ughdance:

Posted

I will keep it simple.

I drive the way I feel that day is my guess. Road type, conditions are all factors.

In general the sped limit or 5-10 over or 5 under speed limit. :happysad:

Posted

I will keep it simple.

I drive the way I feel that day is my guess. Road type, conditions are all factors.

In general the sped limit or 5-10 over or 5 under speed limit. :happysad:

 

Post #24 partial quote:

 

I should have worded it "Engine Operational Utilization Toward Self Propelled Motion Inquiry" aka, what percentage of the engines operating time is spent moving forward.

 

It's a statistics question. Don't know how to make is simpler.

Posted

Data table of what was submitted. We toss the two in yellow. The high and the low.

 

Do the individual calculations for speed. Miles / Hours. Individual average.

 

Calculate a Standard Deviation. 2.29 mph

 

Sum the mileage and the hours then divide the former by the later to get the ‘weighted average’ for the population.

 

Populations weighted central tendency is 34.21 mph

 

Upper control limit 1 standard deviation 36.50 mph

 

Lower control limit 1 standard deviation 31.92 mph

 

68 % of all samples will fall within the upper and lower control limits.

 

Individual average is a bit higher at 35.91 mph.

 

​Pretty small sampling but I find it interesting that it still pretty darn close to Fords Commercial Feet Car numbers.

post-161433-0-46987300-1489343888.png

post-161433-0-46987300-1489343888.png

post-161433-0-46987300-1489343888.png

post-161433-0-46987300-1489343888.png

Posted

Fast enough to get from A to B

Posted

Fast enough to get from A to B

 

There is the speed your targeting. Speed limit or preference. Where you set your cruise control or right foot.

 

Then there is the speed you average as a matter of circumstance. Stop signs, towns, lower speed limit areas and traffic that holds you up. Farm equipment and snow plows. Even the roads you choose to travel. Mc Donald’s drive through. Warm up. Whatever. That's the one we just looked at.

 

There is also your trip average. You leave 8 AM and drive until you find a room that evening say 5 PM. You drove 70 mph. It should have been a 630 mile day.

 

Circumstance reductions took you to 62 mph. Day is now 558 miles.

 

Then there was a 90 minute lunch and a 20 minute fill up plus a stop at some attraction took you days average for the 9 hours between you leaving and retiring to 7.17 hours and a day now is closer to 444 miles.

 

Your 70 mph set point just became a sub 50 mph trip result. Fact is on primary US highways that trip number will average over the ride life about 25-30% under the target speed. Yes you can do much better on Interstate and on short trips but over 250,000 miles…you will have a different pattern.

 

Everyone driving patterns are indeed different and yet…very much alike. They are made up of the same situations just in different proportions and with different priority on each. But drop the numbers in the grinder as a group there won’t be much variance but it is fun to study and see where you fall in that group.

 

Yep, they will all get you there.

Posted

True story about how fast we thing we drive.

 

About 1978 I did an Iron Butt Rally on a modified 76 Harley Super Glide. If you don’t know what this is, it’s riding 1,000 miles or more in 24 hours or less. They are certified and sponsored by a shop. Mine was Cedar Rapids Harley Davidson owned at the time by Bernie and Opal.

My Glide was a bit unusual in that I could knock down 60 mpg like falling off a log but that is a different story for another time. I mention it as a preface to the following so that it makes sense to you.

 

To do this run you need some decent weather, a good plan and a tolerance for pain. Helps to be young too. I was 24. On the face of it it’s simple math. 1,000 / 24 = 41.7 mph. To do that you need a bike capable of 330 + mpg and a three plus gallon tank and the ability to go nonstop for a day without a pee, rest, a meal, a drink…you get the idea. Eating and getting a drink on a bike isn’t an impossible task but the gas, pee and leg cramps…that’s a different story. Point is you need to run faster. You also have to avoid long stops like getting pinched by Johnny Law. These were the days of the double nickel speed limit. Running out of gas sucks. Even frequent stops can make this a tough task so it is most often done on Interstates.

 

I had a 3.5 gallon tank and decided a half gallon was a safe reserve which gave me 180 miles of range. Three hours at 60 mph at 60 mpg clips the trip in 16.67 hours with zero stops. Can’t obviously be done. So I plan a 15 minute fuel and relief stop every three hours of running at 60 mph. That’s 180 miles in 3.25 hours or 55.38 mph. That’s 1000 miles in 18 hours and a few seconds. Leaves six hours for…and it’s the for that kills ya.

 

I sat in a Harley shop on a Sunday for two hours while a new speedo cable was fetched from another dealer and installed. These are certified miles and the repair would need a sign off. I also lost miles from the minute it snapped until I arrived at the dealer I could not count. Another delay of 30 minutes. If I keep this pace going I now need 20.5 hours and my cushion is down to 3.5 hours. We are not done having fun yet. FOG so thick over the dark hours of night slow me to a crawl. Even a stop for a short bit to wring the cramps from my hands and legs.

 

I finish the trip at 1,056 miles done in 22 hours and 6 minutes.

 

47.78 mph average and never ever broke 60 mph for the entire trip. It was recorded as the slowest pace (60 mph peak) ever for the event. This trip is done all the time riding well over 80 mph in much shorter times but the statement stands.

 

Distance is as much a function of time in the seat at a steady sustainable pace as it is speed of the run.

 

​I've done the Denver run, for me it's about 1,000 miles, in under 14 hours by car. It's a much different thing than a bike. Yes I was a close to a hundred and better often.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...