Jump to content

Dodge Durango SRT vs. AL Expedition - Which is your pick?


Recommended Posts

Posted

post-139450-0-29191800-1486493683_thumb.jpeg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
2-7-2017

Ford announced that its all-new 2018 Expedition bigger-than-full-size SUV will be wider and longer. More importantly, it will be lighter. Ford says that depending upon the trim, the Expedition will lose up to 300 pounds. The curb weight of the outgoing Expedition was just under 6,000 pounds. Therefore, the weight loss is roughly 5%. Ford boasts that the combination of its 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine and a class-exclusive 10-speed automatic transmission will enable the SUV to claim best in class towing capacity. Unlike some categories, Ford says that 50% of expedition shoppers value superior towing ability and 15% tow weekly or daily. Ford added, "That’s why the all-new Expedition offers Pro Trailer Backup Assist, which makes backing up a trailer as easy as turning a knob." Ford is also adding WiFi and wireless charging to catch up with GM.

 

This is a big news week for three-row SUVs. Dodge has announced that it will do an SRT Durango, making it the fastest three-row SUV on the market.

post-139450-0-58264100-1486494599_thumb.png

Dodge backs that up with a 12.9-second quarter mile and 4.4 0-60 MPH run certified by NHRA. The Durando SRT packs the 475-horsepower, 392-cubic-inch HEMI V-8 engine. Here's the fun part; Dodge says that this vehicle will out-tow all other three-row SUVs. Either Ford or Dodge are mistaken on the top towing claim.

 

Which is of more interest to you? Dodge Durango SRT or Ford Expedition for 2018?

post-139450-0-29191800-1486493683_thumb.jpeg

post-139450-0-58264100-1486494599_thumb.png

post-139450-0-29191800-1486493683_thumb.jpeg

post-139450-0-58264100-1486494599_thumb.png

post-139450-0-29191800-1486493683_thumb.jpeg

post-139450-0-58264100-1486494599_thumb.png

Posted

A better question to ask is where the hell is a modern Trailblazer SS with an LT1 to compete with the Durango?

 

The traverse looks great, just flip the drivetrain around and stick a V8 under the hood.

 

And this is speaking as someone that has been seriously looking at a Durango RT or Cherokee SRT as a daily driver instead of my pickup.

Posted

I had a trailblazer SS and loved it. It would be nice if you could have that power in a value package like that without the hard ride and low profile tires. Some people would like the 0-60 acceleration and a smooth ride and don't need to corner like a sport car and go 150 MPH.

Posted

Coming from a Trailblazer SS, I'd take the Durango SRT all day. I'm curious about the 1/4 mile times. The current Jeep SRT is a low 13 second vehicle, and I'd imagine the two row Jeep is lighter, but maybe not. I would hope the less expensive Durango would be cheaper than a Jeep SRT.

Posted

I had a trailblazer SS and loved it. It would be nice if you could have that power in a value package like that without the hard ride and low profile tires. Some people would like the 0-60 acceleration and a smooth ride and don't need to corner like a sport car and go 150 MPH.

 

 

I test drove one...and ended up buying a first gen GC SRT8, but man I miss having midsize SUV with a burly V8.

Posted

I looked at one but my trailblazer ss was only 33K in 06, the SRT was a lot more. I did like the looks of the SRT better thou.

 

 

I test drove one...and ended up buying a first gen GC SRT8, but man I miss having midsize SUV with a burly V8.

Posted

You wouldn't catch me dead in the fiat. Ford anytime over fiat.

You'll be singing a different tune when you blow a turbo in these Egoboost engines!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,920
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Frank V
    Newest Member
    Frank V
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,209 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...