Jump to content

Folks with 33's


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hell all. I am about to pull the trigger on 33" tires. I have concerns though about losing power and towing capacity. This 5.3 Sierra already has a hard time getting out of its own way. I have a (roughly) 3500lb travel trailer that I haul a handful of times over the summer. I have 3.42 gears and it pulls ok now but I am worried that dropping that ratio with 33" tires will kill it. Am I worrying too much? Does anyone else have this set up and can advise?

Posted

Hell all. I am about to pull the trigger on 33" tires. I have concerns though about losing power and towing capacity. This 5.3 Sierra already has a hard time getting out of its own way. I have a (roughly) 3500lb travel trailer that I haul a handful of times over the summer. I have 3.42 gears and it pulls ok now but I am worried that dropping that ratio with 33" tires will kill it. Am I worrying too much? Does anyone else have this set up and can advise?

No issues. I have 34x11.5 on my truck (pretty much the same truck). I tow a 7500lb wet trailer. No remarkable issues. It's not passing sports cars uphill... but it's not being passed by 18 wheelers either.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

use this website to pick out your tires

http://tire-size-conversion.com/tire-size-calculator/

 

stock tires and wheels are about 80-90lbs a piece. i just got some 285/70/17 toyos that weigh 58lbs and the rims are 27. no loss at all and still getting same milage.

 

i used to have 34/12s and i lost milage and power but my 5.3 still towed beautiful 3500lbs is not that heavy u shouldent worry at all.

Posted

I lost a little acceleration but it was minimal

 

 

2017 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71 6.2L

4.5" Zone

22x10 AF Grips

33x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers

Instagram @wildchevys

Posted

Increased diameter will work against you in acceleration and fuel economy. Also, wider and more aggressive tread is a negative for economy. I'm running 33x12.50x18 at/mud tires and my mileage is about 12.5 city/15 hwy with my 5.3L. That's my driving habits, on my routes. As they say: your mileage may vary.

 

My advice: don't go with more aggressive tread than you need.

Posted

Increased diameter will work against you in acceleration and fuel economy. Also, wider and more aggressive tread is a negative for economy. I'm running 33x12.50x18 at/mud tires and my mileage is about 12.5 city/15 hwy with my 5.3L. That's my driving habits, on my routes. As they say: your mileage may vary.

 

My advice: don't go with more aggressive tread than you need.

 

Spot on, it's just based on tire size/aggressive or not and how you drive - I'm at a 285/70/17 (E-rated) and I'm running 16 city/20 hwy. I do have a 3.08/8-spd and E-assist though.

Posted

Damn 5.3 is slow as it is. My neighbors Tundra TRD Pro smokes me WITH E rated 295's

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • They are talking about adding more tax to our fuel across Canada by the labour day time frame, its the carbon idiot tax increase on top of the pile of fuel taxes we already pay thanks to the WEF dictatorship running the country. 10 cents per liter on gas and 4 cents a liter on diesel I believe is what was said. That is a huge amount of a tax increase as its another 38 cents equivalent to a US gallon of gas. The reason our fuel is higher than the states already is because of of the high taxes they have imposed on fuel. 
    • This is just a thought as I can't claim this is the correct thing to do but will suggest it and you can decide if its something you would try. First round up some electrical contact cleaner spray as they at least claim its not supposed to damage the components ( brake cleaner depending on the type is a real destroyer of plastic etc ) and to use that to assist to clean out any grime from the pins as well as the mechanism by spraying and working the lever etc. Then my next thought is to use silicone spray lube and not on the pins but on the seal and the pivot assembly. It may not be possible to spray it on certain area's and have to use a q tip as Davestar mentioned to keep it from getting on the pins. Dielectric grease can be fine on some things but its easy to get too much on if not careful and then gunk things up and a possible risk of getting it on the pins or sockets. The silicone spray is able to get into a mechanical component to help lube and on surfaces its just a fine film to reduce friction such as that seal. Also it can be doused off with a good flush of the electrical contact cleaner the next time for a repeat of a "clean and then lightly lube" step process to wash off any dirt that had stuck to the exterior etc of the plug.   Free advice, yes. Good advice ... now there's the question mark !    
    • Hey thanks yall for the info. It apparently was the key fob - the "reserve" key fob works just fine. Yall were all over it. Great input! JRD
    • I just bought one of these.   https://www.topdon.us/collections/diagnostic-tools/products/artidiag-pro   Yeah, it`s got a cable. $250/year after 2 years. Do I want more? Yep. But, I`m not working any more and can`t afford a whirlpool in my tool box.
    • Why don't I have a good scanner? I've always wanted one when I've needed one.   My latest reading says I don't need to do a relearn on the ckp sensor on a 1995 with OBD 1.5. The relearn is prescribed for the later-model 1995's which shipped with actual OBD II when GM completed the transition in prep for the 1996 MY. I need to confirm that. Did you know forums are disappearing? Knuckleheads on Facebook... it's not the same. It's just not.   So, scanners. Again, shooting myself in the foot for having eBayed my Snap On MT2500 "brick" with all the adapters. Not that I couldn't buy another but those are getting quite old, and mine wasn't new enough to work on 2000's vehicles.   Damn it (as I'm scanning my email between paragraphs here). Did you know there's a 2000 Jimmy 2-door on BaT that's ending this morning? It's local. I want it. 14k miles. Absolutely beautiful.   Back to scanners. MT2500's are old. Solus, now that could be a contender. There's a ~2008 Verus with a system error that's basically new in box for cheap. Hmm...I'm not sure about a scanner that runs an archaic version of windows (95 or CE, I can't tell).   I want the ability to reset and rotate TPMS, test individual modules, bleed ABS, electronic parking brake controls for servicing brakes, relearn procedures and other bidirectional controls.   Snap On does an MT2600. It's a new model as of last year, marketed as their "entry" scanner. Entry? Only where $1900 gets you through the doorway plus, I'm guessing, $1000/year if you wish to keep it current. So goes scan tools actually designed for production environments. Want decent products with excellent support, you pay for it.   Everyone is raving about Autels and TopDons and Foxconns and all these newer brands that are selling the $500 "prosumer" scanners for backyard hacks like me. They're tempting...honestly. Updates are cheaper, base prices are remarkably cheaper... And you get to deal with bugs and translation whoopsies and, well, just don't use it on anything expensive, OK? Having a dealer replace an ECU because it needs to be re-imaged after an adventure in scanning is no joke. But I think most people are getting by OK with these units.   eBay on a scratch-and-sniff pro-model oldie, a shiny new TopDon, or???   God dang it, I can't stop looking at this Jimmy. I'm ready! I'll Bring The TRailer! It's beautiful.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...