Jump to content

Will GM expand its manuals?

Logan Lanfear

By Logan Lanfear
in Future GM News & Rumors

Recommended Posts

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Logan Lanfear said:

I started this to compare what GM did with manuals to see how they would continue it.  Obviously trucks have come a long way.  My 1998 is very "advanced" with just as many options as my 2008 had.  Gets the same mileage.  The 2008 just has higher capacities.  The advancement comes through technology that allows us to do more with the same amount of fuel.  You say that manuals are dead however they're still produced? Obviously GM has given up on full size truck manuals but they have truck options and vehicle options with a manual.  Just because someone tends to enjoy shifting while they drive doesn't mean they cant understand that autos have came a long way.  

It isn't a matter of enjoyment. It's a matter of functionality and refinement. I can think of exactly one automatic transmission that I believe might be worth of comparison to a manual. The Mazda SkyActiv used in the Scion iA aka Mazda 2 coupe. Comparisons made to other inadequate designs are comparisons without reference that matters. Yes the 6L80/6L90 is quite the box compared to a Powerflite but no so much compared to the Mazda's state of refinement. No it doesn't have the capacity to do a truck but....If capacity is all I needed give me an Allison. 

Daly Senior Enthusiast

Daly

Posted
Posted

GM won't be putting slush boxes back in trucks anytime soon, if at all, for the same two reasons they stopped in the first place. Automatics have come a long way and are just as, if not more, efficient then Manuals and the sales of manuals were below 2% which made it not worth the money to invest in the segment anymore. Less and less people drive stick shift unfortunately. The die hard drivers that want a stick shift, just don't equate to enough sales to justify it to the manufactures any more. The Colorado gets one simply because of the market it's deployed in, mainly oversea's where they still drive stick, and millennial don't exist as much. Because lets face it, it's those pricks that caused this, it's hard to burry your face in a mobile device when you have to watch the road, let alone shift gears.

 

Another thing to look at is the Ram 2500 and 3500's with a manual get a derated cummins. I'm not sure of exact numbers but with an auto they have a significantly higher torque rating. With the majority of the population wanting automatics, that's where the development money went, as a result they can handle the power, economy and reliability better than they use to. There isn't even a way to check the trans fluid in an automatic anymore. 

 

I do miss running through the gears in a manual though, and have being saving money to switch my Duster over to a manual, just so I can get my fix. I was even looking into switching my 91 C2500 to a SM465 (yes I prefer it over the NV4500), but I might just see if I can find a truck instead, it would be just as expensive.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Daly said:

GM won't be putting slush boxes back in trucks anytime soon, if at all, for the same two reasons they stopped in the first place. Automatics have come a long way and are just as, if not more, efficient then Manuals and the sales of manuals were below 2% which made it not worth the money to invest in the segment anymore. 

Slush boxes are automatics young one.

You can heard Lemmings over the nearest cliff with good marketing. De-rated motors by Dodge in your post are a perfect example. Can't get what you want with the manual but can with the automatic steers people out of a segment while maintaining the 'claim' of offering but no one bought. Oh poor me. Then there's this...who of the current generation of drivers can actually drive a stick? They can't even parallel park! Ford fixed that too. It will do it for you. But boy do they have an opinion on it. 

 

Manual transmissions are going the way of film in cameras. Anyone old enough to have actually been highly proficient with film knows for a fact that it excels head and shoulders over digital but digital makes more money so money wins and people loose again and yet believe they have advanced. And now we are convinced that calling BS on something makes it so by popular opinion. What digital did was give people who have no understanding of the art the ability to not embarrass themselves opening the family album. Photos are about the picture not the profit in the picture. People are easy to confuse. 

 

Manual machining v CNC. CNC doesn't make a better part. It makes a close enough for horseshoes" parts fast enough to quadruple profits. Any decent old time chip maker can make the part to a greater level of precision than any CNC machine. He just can't do if faster. 

 

People are confused about the difference between something being better and something being profitable. That's possible if marketing waits long enough for the one who knew to die off. There's always some jackass telling the world they are the same thing. 

Daly Senior Enthusiast

Daly

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Slush boxes are automatics young one.

 

Hardly a young one, just groggy and hung over. I started off writing something different and switched the way I wanted to state it. I was going to say "GM won't be offering anything but a slush box", but went a different direction...

Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted

I stopped buying trucks with a manual transmission only because they were no longer offered.  I get frustrated when I hear it said that there wasn't enough sales.  It is hard to sell something that isn't available.  The many threads I read on this forum from members complaining about their transmissions (hunting for gears & poor performance) suggests to me that there is a place for the manual.  It doesn't need to be relegated to base models or RAM 3/4 tons.  If they offered a truck appropriate manual transmission in a higher trim Silverado or Sierra,  sales may surprise the bean counters at GM.

Logan Lanfear Enthusiast

Logan Lanfear

Posted
  • Author
Posted
23 hours ago, Donstar said:

I stopped buying trucks with a manual transmission only because they were no longer offered.  I get frustrated when I hear it said that there wasn't enough sales.  It is hard to sell something that isn't available.  The many threads I read on this forum from members complaining about their transmissions (hunting for gears & poor performance) suggests to me that there is a place for the manual.  It doesn't need to be relegated to base models or RAM 3/4 tons.  If they offered a truck appropriate manual transmission in a higher trim Silverado or Sierra,  sales may surprise the bean counters at GM.

I think the bigger problem is the derated towing and power numbers that often come with manuals.  I think the auto companies dont give drivers enough credit to be able to competently use a manual.  They can definitely build them strongly enough.  I would rather tow with a manual.  

  • 5 months later...
Revan Enthusiast

Revan

Posted
Posted

Sooner or later manuals will be relegated to super bare subcompacts and some sports cars

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • rdonarski
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By rdonarski · Posted

      This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • PBNB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By PBNB · Posted

      How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...