Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, irish26 said:

I tend to agree. I have small children and my wife thinks they will have a heat stroke when they have to sit in the back seat of my truck in the Florida heat. It may be a small feature for most, but it's one more reason for me to hold out for the 2019's instead of buying a discounted 2018.

Well, back when I had the 2005 I was hauling my three kiddos around too.  Now, I’m hauling my two grandchildren around (time does fly).  So, the rear HVAC has become important again.  As you, I’m going to wait for the 2019 as it supposedly is on a new frame along with some other new features.   And, I’m probably going to try out the magnetic ride option and see how well it performs.  I occasionally tow a 6,000 lb TT so I’ll stay with the 6.2L which in mho is the best gas burner on the market for towing.  Anyway, my two bits ?.

Posted

Those vents under the seat (2014+) that some people are mentioning only blow air when the ac controller is set to floor or split. They do not work in normal/front ac mode.

 

Having true rear vents make a significant difference for the back passengers.

Posted
On 3/4/2018 at 3:55 PM, 05SIERRAMAN said:

They have had A/C vents in the headliner of the SUV's since the NBS trucks that's over 20+ years man! GM really needs to think outside the box people will pay for these trucks if they are equipped correctly. 

Guess the make and year of this car ?....

 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, TxSilver said:

Those vents under the seat (2014+) that some people are mentioning only blow air when the ac controller is set to floor or split. They do not work in normal/front ac mode.

 

Having true rear vents make a significant difference for the back passengers.

I had a 2005 CCSB GMT800 truck with rear vents in the console, its the exact same the rear vents will only get air if set to floor for the rear passengers, you not moving enough air,  GMT800 cooling system was horrible, today cooling down the cab with the current system is fine.

 

If want to make a difference with the rear passengers install ceramic window tint. &  sound deaden/insulate your truck especially the damn roof. 

Edited by 05SIERRAMAN
Posted
1 hour ago, 05SIERRAMAN said:

I had a 2005 CCSB GMT800 truck with rear vents in the console, its the exact same the rear vents will only get air if set to floor for the rear passengers, you not moving enough air,  GMT800 cooling system was horrible, today cooling down the cab with the current system is fine.

 

If want to make a difference with the rear passengers install ceramic window tint. &  sound deaden/insulate your truck especially the damn roof. 

The lack of rear vents almost made me buy the redesigned Tundra back in 2013.

 

Also, as you know here in Texas, one of the first mods is to install window tint. Heck, sometimes my arm still gets sunburned with it, so don't want to imagine what it would be without it.

Posted
27 minutes ago, TxSilver said:

 one of the first mods is to install window tint. Heck, sometimes my arm still gets sunburned with it, so don't want to imagine what it would be without it.

ceramic... worth every penny! regular ol carbon/metalized tint doesn't hold a candle to ceramic tint.

Posted

I remember when I filled out the GMC new vehicle survey on my 2014 Sierra CC, the only 2 areas I marked unsatisfactory were the lack of rear air vents and the dim headlights. Only took GMC 5 years to finally install rear air vents. Them engineering boys can be slow!

Posted
8 hours ago, TxSilver said:

The lack of rear vents almost made me buy the redesigned Tundra back in 2013.

 

Also, as you know here in Texas, one of the first mods is to install window tint. Heck, sometimes my arm still gets sunburned with it, so don't want to imagine what it would be without it.

Lol, yup, it does get hot here in Texas.  About the AC situation and the two camps on this thread; the pro rear vent vs the anti rear vent groups.  I’ve had vehicles configured each way.  Concerning the Silverado specifically, I agree that the entire cab will cool sufficiently with front only vents.  However, the problem with not having the rear vents is with temperature balance.   In order to adequately cool the folks in the back seat the folks in the front have to endure the AC set on max cool going full blast.  At least thats the way it is here in the summer in Texas when temps are routinely 100+ degrees.  So, how about we agree on a little compromise (can’t we all just get along ? ?) and allow GM to install rear ac vents as standard in the high-end models such as LTZ/SLT and Denali/HighCountry and not install in the less expensive models unless ordered as an option?  How about that boys and girls?  Will that work ??

Posted
19 hours ago, 05SIERRAMAN said:

I had a 2005 CCSB GMT800 truck with rear vents in the console, its the exact same the rear vents will only get air if set to floor for the rear passengers, you not moving enough air,  GMT800 cooling system was horrible, today cooling down the cab with the current system is fine.

 

If want to make a difference with the rear passengers install ceramic window tint. &  sound deaden/insulate your truck especially the damn roof. 

I have a gmt800 avalanche so it may be different but the console vents do indeed work on settings other than floor. 

Posted

My Nissan Titan had rear A/C vents and heated seat for the rear passengers. My wife's 2016 Tahoe has good hvac and other basic amenities that I just assumed the 2018 Silverado would have so I didn't think to look. It's my own fault for assuming things, but the fact is, putting up with a hot truck would have made the growing list of things to cause people to bypass the Chevy Silverado.

Posted
On 7/11/2018 at 5:10 PM, Snoringbear said:

Guess the make and year of this car ?....

 

 

In the event anyone is curious;  the pic I attempted to post was of President Eisenhower’s 1956 Continental Mark II.  Specifically, the pic was an interior shot showing AC vents in the headliner over the rear seats.  I believe 1956 May have been the last year that AC unit was in the trunk but not sure.

  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 3/2/2018 at 3:39 PM, camcamaro1991 said:

c4ba8afef393f9d5d5c2d7b1269f028c.jpg

28f3845fa264f6f9c269252facd4aa51.jpg

01392fdc85b651c325b6f0b18c778ff6.jpg

 

d50b59272f2d9d47dfc506789cf509c4.jpg

 

 

The rest is just for FYI... I been all over this truck, spent loads of time roaming around this chassis, down to the sheet metal. 

dcfe38501d41d601c30f5da028dc1bc3.jpg

623c4638834ab255d39c41c3aaa737cb.jpg



b0bbe411ef71e2b6f6cb414405d9bc84.jpg

815f0536a6e05193a9ec423c8e5f9d50.jpg

4272fcb6e3dd7bd967bf31b2f335e272.jpg

ead34e5a43102418f1e407efae6df574.jpg

@camcamaro1991dude you know your s**t!! I was just reading this entire post and you definitely know about vents and all lol 😂 you think it’d be possible to modify those floor vents and route them into the console? I’m sure someone would be happy to design a vent plate for that console layout lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...