Jump to content

Clunk ! When Letting Off Gas

GMC-AT
 Share

Recommended Posts

GMC-AT Senior Enthusiast

GMC-AT

Posted
Posted

2000 Silverado - 4x4, 5.3, Auto

 

When I let off the gas at slow speeds (20mph, etc) I often get the "clunk" that these trucks are famous for.  I know it has to go with the slip yoke, and greasing the yoke only seems to last for a little while.  My question is - I though I saw a while back where we can purchase a new - improved slip yoke.  Can someone post a link to the part? and provide any other important info  I may need. thanks!

 

GMC-AT Senior Enthusiast

GMC-AT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Both U Joint were replaced about 2K miles ago.. never changed anything.  Any other ideas?

Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted

Yes, it is a nickel plated slip yoke. Mine was covered under warranty back in 2003 for the clunk.  Might try to get in touch with MS3DALE on here and see if he can hook you up with one, if they are still available.

Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, GMC-AT said:

This looks to be the correct part  -  https://www.amazon.com/APDTY-708613-Driveshaft-1992-2005-01-04-17-004/dp/B00C8E8BH0/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1522285772&vehicle=2000-47-491-96-30-31-6-8-7910--9-2-145--3-0&sr=1-1-catcorr&ymm=2000%3Achevrolet%3Asilverado+1500&keywords=slip+yoke

 

 

That looks to be the one.

  • 1 month later...
GMC-AT Senior Enthusiast

GMC-AT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just replaced with nickel plated slip yoke - still have the clunk.  only when letting off gas at low speed around 20-15 mph. Seems like the 3-2 downshift.  If I put the truck in neutral.. it doesn't clunk at all when breaking at low speeds.  Also installed new U Joints front and rear. . 

Any other ideas? 

Supreme Pizza Senior Enthusiast

Supreme Pizza

Posted
Posted

You will find plenty of play in the rear axle, but the drive shaft should be "0" play. I assume that you are not using "4x4 auto" mode, correct? It should ALWAYS be in 2x4 mode and not "auto" unless you are in show or mud. 

sefiroxx Enthusiast

sefiroxx

Posted
Posted

There is a TSB stating this is normal and no repair is necessary.

That said, options/ideas:
- the computer controls the timing of the release of the 3-4 clutches and apply of the 2-4 band based on throttle position, speed etc. If you have/had problems with related sensors, repair and see if the computer resets
- of e a new problem, then 3-2 valve spring or solenoid may be going bad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      My brother has a 2007 Avalanche with afm 5.3. It`s got 176,000 miles. Runs like a clock. Never been apart. Co worker has a 2010 Tahoe with afm 5.3. 230,000 miles. Never been apart. Runs like a clock. So, even though cyl deac is a weak spot, they can go the distance.   BUT, these engines had the oil changed regularly, AND had 5w30 as spec. I wonder if they would have lasted this far on 0w20? I`ll bet not.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • asilverblazer
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...