Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Unfortunately I don't have enough time to work on my own truck as much as I'd like, much less work on others'.  But if you pick up HP Tuners (which is good for lots of other things as well) I'd be happy to walk you through it.  It's easy enough a caveman can do it.    :)

 

If your trans is running hotter than it used to, that suggests something changed.  The thermostat might be going bad, debris may be blocking the cooler, etc.  The biggest single thing you can do for trans temps is getting rid of the stock thermostat.  Makes a huge difference.  I'll be posting some results as soon as I have the chance.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I'm searching for an alternative GM 180 thermostat?  

 

I've researched the reviews on Jet, and other aftermarket low temperature thermostats and ALL seem to have a very low rating, poor gasket design or material prone to premature failure.

 

I've seen the GM 197 degree part # 12674634

 

I really prefer a lower thermostat is anyone is aware of a GM OEM .

 

Thanks

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

FWIW, I put the summit 180 degree in about 9 months ago. I believe it is Summit branded Jet thermostat and I also had read that the seal can become detached and the stat not fully close. The rubber seal appeared to be thermally fused onto the disk very well. I just traveled 2000 miles to Dallas and back and scanned using hp-tuners some of the way and the temp stays rock solid at ~186 degrees. If you don't trust the Jet get the gm 196 one and use an old Chevy trick and drill a small hole in the disk. I believe a 1/8 or 3/16 hole is all you need to allow a bit of bypass and drop the temps. I don't think GM makes a 180 for any of the new motors as they are supposed to run much hotter.

Posted

Great thread.  Any consensus on what the best low temp thermostat for the transmission is? Or has anyone experimented with different trans fluids? In a built 700r an expert I know recommended lubrication engineers (not an apples comparison) but they seem to have an impressive array of quality lubricants.

 

Currently my trans hardly ever runs much over 185deg, and seems to struggle to get up to temp on short (less than 20min) trips. I almost think that the ECM is programed not to go into "closed loop" type functions until it hits over 130 deg.  Is my thermostat stuck open/closed?

 

I have the shroud inside the grille removed so I'm not sure if that is having in impact on the cooling (overcooling in some situations. When hot it works well, but want to understand what I can do to manage heat and have it get up to temp in a consistent way, and cool predictably.

 

Sounds like the GM (coolant) 197deg thermostat is a great option for those that want OEM build quality vs risky aftermarket junk.  Also the takeaway from this thread is aftermarket coolers are not necessary for most unless you are placing your truck in extreme conditions. A intelligently modified , well set up/maintained factory set up seems to be adequate depending on use.

 

Also not sure of the pros/cons with the exception of potential start up wear, but I've been running 0~w40 (Castrol full syn, not a brand loyalist just have not seen the evidence that one is so far superior, rather change more frequently and use a quality filter (Wix,  K&N, or mobil 1))European formula for some time now and it maintains pressure when hot much better than 0~w20. Just seems too thin especially when the camaros and vettes run it or offer it as an upgrade in the same platform (LT). If there is something MUCH better please let me know just always get the same amsoil, Royal P responses. 

 

 I want to hit the 300k goal.

Posted

Kennerz,
   I was talking about engine coolant thermostat and not transmission thermostat. From what I've heard the 160 degree engine tstat is too cold and will cause problems for closed loop operation. 180 should be lowest you go. The 196 is still way better than the higher one the truck comes with and the massively high engine, IAT and under-hood temps that go with it in the Arizona summer where i live.

 

Some people are removing the thermostat from the transmission and not replacing it. A turbo 700r is vastly different to what we have now. Even using the recommended GM fluid there are issues and they are working to reformulate it for better operation. If you want to experiment with other fluids and let us all know what you find i'm all ears.

Posted
On 3/15/2019 at 10:15 AM, CyaDwnthaRd said:

I'm searching for an alternative GM 180 thermostat?  

 

I've researched the reviews on Jet, and other aftermarket low temperature thermostats and ALL seem to have a very low rating, poor gasket design or material prone to premature failure.

 

I've seen the GM 197 degree part # 12674634

 

I really prefer a lower thermostat is anyone is aware of a GM OEM .

 

Thanks

 

 

Katech just released some for the camaro and vette. Not sure if they work on our trucks.

Posted (edited)

excellent write up,  only problem I have with the 180 t-stat from the aftermarket is it's very unreliable..... I would recomment taking a factory t-stat and drilling out a few bi-pass holes to lower the stock temp control, instead of using the aftermarket parts for a 180 temp

 

my origional plan was to use an inline thermostat housing to replace the factory t-stat, this way i can use the old style 350 chevy t-stats from AC/Delco wich come in a range of temps from 150, 165, 170,175, 180-210 F , something like this  part..

https://www.amazon.com/Meziere-WN0072-Inline-Thermostat-Housing/dp/B003NDHHAW/ref=sr_1_1?crid=16XGJRKSXVSYZ&keywords=inline+thermostat+for+car&qid=1553956190&s=gateway&sprefix=inline+thermostat+%2Caps%2C230&sr=8-1

 

it should be noted, these engines are machined and built for the higher temps, so the colder they run, the diamentions of the parts are not fully expanding , thus your clearances will be sloppier.  take the pistons, for example. they are a special metalurgy and if not at correct temp, will make a sound like piston slap in the bore witch might trigger knock sensor, and pull timing = lower power., then you have bearing clearances for the oil gallery. Half a thou  diamention can really change lube control to the crankshaft

 

also I notice you haven't deleted the thermostat in the tranny yet, , this is a must do for towing!

Edited by flyingfool
Posted
13 hours ago, Pearl2017 said:

Kennerz,
   I was talking about engine coolant thermostat and not transmission thermostat. From what I've heard the 160 degree engine tstat is too cold and will cause problems for closed loop operation. 180 should be lowest you go. The 196 is still way better than the higher one the truck comes with and the massively high engine, IAT and under-hood temps that go with it in the Arizona summer where i live.

 

Some people are removing the thermostat from the transmission and not replacing it. A turbo 700r is vastly different to what we have now. Even using the recommended GM fluid there are issues and they are working to reformulate it for better operation. If you want to experiment with other fluids and let us all know what you find i'm all ears.

Flying fool - was pretty right on regarding the 160 deg water coolant thermostat. That may have been a good mod on the original small blocks, but has been a bad idea for a long time. Even the 87' up hydraulic rollers tolerances were tight enough to have problems not coming up to temp and increasing wear from running too cold (not enough material expansion) or not going into ecm closed loop operation and washing the cylinders down with gas. Every generation since has gotten increasingly tight tolerances using different expansion rate (aluminum/sleeves/etc..) material. The LS's like to run hot (were designed to run hot) and the Gen V LT is the most extreme so far when it comes to design intent. Meaning they made it that way for a reason (usually low emissions) to run hotter.

 

There is obviously some room for improvement from a performance perspective  by making slight changes - just more is not really better with these newer engines.  

 

If you can find a quality 180 coolant stat probably would be OK, 195 would probably be more in line with the ECM parameters and engine design.  Surprised no one's mentioned an aftermarket radiator. For the trans I would think a 160 stat would be good since the old adage that automatics live longer when cool still holds true.  

 

Really appreciate all those contributing to this discussion as I'm trying to figure out the benefits myself and what and how much to mod and for what uses (towing/daily).

Posted

Call Mark Johnson at IPSCO.org upper hose inline thermostat housing. Gut factory housing. Do not block or remove return hose to tank. It keeps the pump happy. Drill bleed hole in flange .0625 to .0781. This is not to make it cooler but to provide some water movement past the min flow bypass in the stock housing to give the wax pill something to work with. 

 

Stant Supersant 160 F Part # 45356 Requires some tuning. Mainly used on boosted motors. Not really a street item otherwise.  

Reische 170 F Part # NB54 I expect this is the Dayco part. a $10 part Imported from Australia with silly shipping charges. 

Dayco 170 F Part # DT14E Both Dayco and Reische are over $50 this side of the world. 

Stant Superstat 180 F Part # 45358 My favorite. Removes 20 to 30 F from the system, Very ECU friendly. 

Stant OE Type 195 F Part # 13359 Could also use the factory housing and GM # 12674634 actually 197 F

Stant OE Type 205 F Part # 13352. A choice if  you swap thermostats with the seasons....

 

Flepro #35710 Seal required and supplied with one of the Stant thermostats of your choice by IPSCO. 

 

After three gasket failures from OEM type replacements, JET, Summit, Mishimoto, etc I quit. Whipple has a 160 F all brass gasketless for the stock housing for boosted motors. I do not have a part number for that one. Great idea that needs a few more choices. 

 

The fancy machine work is not standard. Mark did this at my request. 

 

DSCF3016.JPG

 

Clip from my build thread: pg 24: 

 

[First outing today 184-186 F water. 153-163 F transmission. 204 - 210 F engine oil. 82 - 87 F air temperature. 60% humidity. 55 - 60 mph. 12 - 15 mph wind on my 12 then on my 6 round trip.]

 

Trans is thermostat delete. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

after deleting the trans t-stat i run 120-135 all day long, no aux trans. cooler nessecary,  even with a 7500 lbs trailer towing in the desert, I never got past 150F  after 120 mile drive with the trailer, I do have 3.73 gears

Edited by flyingfool
  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/30/2019 at 11:29 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

Call Mark Johnson at IPSCO.org upper hose inline thermostat housing. Gut factory housing. Do not block or remove return hose to tank. It keeps the pump happy. Drill bleed hole in flange .0625 to .0781. This is not to make it cooler but to provide some water movement past the min flow bypass in the stock housing to give the wax pill something to work with. 

 

Stant Supersant 160 F Part # 45356 Requires some tuning. Mainly used on boosted motors. Not really a street item otherwise.  

Reische 170 F Part # NB54 I expect this is the Dayco part. a $10 part Imported from Australia with silly shipping charges. 

Dayco 170 F Part # DT14E Both Dayco and Reische are over $50 this side of the world. 

Stant Superstat 180 F Part # 45358 My favorite. Removes 20 to 30 F from the system, Very ECU friendly. 

Stant OE Type 195 F Part # 13359 Could also use the factory housing and GM # 12674634 actually 197 F

Stant OE Type 205 F Part # 13352. A choice if  you swap thermostats with the seasons....

 

Flepro #35710 Seal required and supplied with one of the Stant thermostats of your choice by IPSCO. 

 

After three gasket failures from OEM type replacements, JET, Summit, Mishimoto, etc I quit. Whipple has a 160 F all brass gasketless for the stock housing for boosted motors. I do not have a part number for that one. Great idea that needs a few more choices. 

 

The fancy machine work is not standard. Mark did this at my request. 

 

DSCF3016.JPG

 

Clip from my build thread: pg 24: 

 

[First outing today 184-186 F water. 153-163 F transmission. 204 - 210 F engine oil. 82 - 87 F air temperature. 60% humidity. 55 - 60 mph. 12 - 15 mph wind on my 12 then on my 6 round trip.]

 

Trans is thermostat delete. 

what size is the upper gm rad hose in inches?

Posted
2 hours ago, flyingfool said:

what size is the upper gm rad hose in inches?

Ah...well...it's metric but Mark knew the closest SAE size and it works well. I can't remember. Great find on the T stat. 170's are rare this side of down under. I see it already has the pilot hole too. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...