Jump to content

Fuel Mileage Drop - Is this amount normal?


Recommended Posts

Posted

So not too long ago, i got my 2017 Silverado 1500 Double Cab leveled with a 2 inch tough country leveling kit. I then added a tonneau cover and switched from Auto to 2 wheel drive mode and was averaging 18.5 to 18.8 mpg. Before the leveling kit, tonneau cover, and 2wheel drive, I averaged 16.4 to 16.7 on 20 inch stock wheels, tires measured at 31 inches.

 

After about a month I upgraded to 33X12.5X20 toyo open country R/T's and now my MPG has dropped to 14.9 to 15.2mpg. 

 

I'm feeling like this drop is a bit larger than what it should have been? I expected a drop but i thought i'd probably get closer to my original 16.4-16.7 stock average.

 

The tires are at 37psi, but in the mornings they are at 34 which is when half my usual driving is done, then during the day its up at 37. Sometimes i'll see a tire or two go up to 38-39.  I'm wondering if this is the issue? Do i need to up my PSI? 

IMG_20180623_210803.jpg

Posted
So not too long ago, i got my 2017 Silverado 1500 Double Cab leveled with a 2 inch tough country leveling kit. I then added a tonneau cover and switched from Auto to 2 wheel drive mode and was averaging 18.5 to 18.8 mpg. Before the leveling kit, tonneau cover, and 2wheel drive, I averaged 16.4 to 16.7 on 20 inch stock wheels, tires measured at 31 inches.
 
After about a month I upgraded to 33X12.5X20 toyo open country R/T's and now my MPG has dropped to 14.9 to 15.2mpg. 
 
I'm feeling like this drop is a bit larger than what it should have been? I expected a drop but i thought i'd probably get closer to my original 16.4-16.7 stock average.
 
The tires are at 37psi, but in the mornings they are at 34 which is when half my usual driving is done, then during the day its up at 37. Sometimes i'll see a tire or two go up to 38-39.  I'm wondering if this is the issue? Do i need to up my PSI? 
IMG_20180623_210803.thumb.jpg.95edbe8abe498dbb09e2aec451e723ed.jpg


Larger tire changes the ratio and effects your speedometer and odometer. Aggressive tread pattern and tire weight are also to blame


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bushleaguechew said:

 


Larger tire changes the ratio and effects your speedometer and odometer. Aggressive tread pattern and tire weight are also to blame


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I totally get that, and i expected a drop, but this is nearly 4mpg. I've seen trucks starting off with even smaller tires then i have go up to 33's and only lose 2 to 2.5mpg, i lost almost 4 and i went from 31's to 33's. It seems too steep, and i can only think of the tire psi possibly being the blame with half my driving being done in the mornings with the PSI at 34 when they should be 37.

Posted

Are hand calculating your MPGs or just relying on the computer to be right? 

 

Did you recalibrate the speedo?

 

The weight of the wheel/tire combo, amount of plies, and tread design all play a part in MPGs (rolling mass). 

Posted
I totally get that, and i expected a drop, but this is nearly 4mpg. I've seen trucks starting off with even smaller tires then i have go up to 33's and only lose 2 to 2.5mpg, i lost almost 4 and i went from 31's to 33's. It seems too steep, and i can only think of the tire psi possibly being the blame with half my driving being done in the mornings with the PSI at 34 when they should be 37.


Level kits raise the front allowing more air to confront your front end creating resistance as well as bigger meatier tires. Realize you have a level in front but is your rear end lifted at all??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I totally get that, and i expected a drop, but this is nearly 4mpg. I've seen trucks starting off with even smaller tires then i have go up to 33's and only lose 2 to 2.5mpg, i lost almost 4 and i went from 31's to 33's. It seems too steep, and i can only think of the tire psi possibly being the blame with half my driving being done in the mornings with the PSI at 34 when they should be 37.


You lost 2-2.5 and also your uncalibrated speedo, odometer and trip computer are showing a further 1.5-2 loss that isn’t real and will go away once your properly calibrated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Oh! I forgot about speedometer!

 

I havent had it recalibrated. 

 

The back end was never touched, only the front went up 2 inches so i still have an 0.5 inch rake that is damn near unnoticeable. I measure my mpg by the tank, when i fill up, i reset the trip meter. In the last 1/2 tank, the average is pretty much set, it may go up or down 0.2 before 1/4 tank when i fill it back up, but thats typically when i take my reading for that tank of gas.

 

Thanks for the replies!

Posted
Oh! I forgot about speedometer!

 

I havent had it recalibrated. 

 

The back end was never touched, only the front went up 2 inches so i still have an 0.5 inch rake that is damn near unnoticeable. I measure my mpg by the tank, when i fill up, i reset the trip meter. In the last 1/2 tank, the average is pretty much set, it may go up or down 0.2 before 1/4 tank when i fill it back up, but thats typically when i take my reading for that tank of gas.

 

Thanks for the replies!

 

When you’re on the highway your truck doesn’t sit level, it’s raising in front from wind while dropping in the back, add 1” in rear may help. I’ve got 18 CC 6.2 Z71 2” front and added 1” rear, 20X9 33” KO2’s with Fuel wheels. Highway average 22-23 city average 15-16. I’ve got the RollNLock bed cover too.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
17 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 

When you’re on the highway your truck doesn’t sit level, it’s raising in front from wind while dropping in the back, add 1” in rear may help. I’ve got 18 CC 6.2 Z71 2” front and added 1” rear, 20X9 33” KO2’s with Fuel wheels. Highway average 22-23 city average 15-16. I’ve got the RollNLock bed cover too.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for that! That info helps too. I'm using Fuel Assault 20x9's with 33" Toyo Open Country R/T's. I dont have the rollnlock but i'd love one haha, i have a cheaper tri-fold, but it works very well for what i need. I'm not sure of my city vs hwy averages, but my overall averages are what i listed. Maybe i should measure those averages too? That might help with some info. 

 

Did you get your speedometer calibrated? You mentioned adding 1" in the rear, how noticable is your rake with that? My goal was to get rid of my rake.

Posted
Thanks for that! That info helps too. I'm using Fuel Assault 20x9's with 33" Toyo Open Country R/T's. I dont have the rollnlock but i'd love one haha, i have a cheaper tri-fold, but it works very well for what i need. I'm not sure of my city vs hwy averages, but my overall averages are what i listed. Maybe i should measure those averages too? That might help with some info. 
 
Did you get your speedometer calibrated? You mentioned adding 1" in the rear, how noticable is your rake with that? My goal was to get rid of my rake.

No I did not, no need, I just add a few extra on lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Thanks for that! That info helps too. I'm using Fuel Assault 20x9's with 33" Toyo Open Country R/T's. I dont have the rollnlock but i'd love one haha, i have a cheaper tri-fold, but it works very well for what i need. I'm not sure of my city vs hwy averages, but my overall averages are what i listed. Maybe i should measure those averages too? That might help with some info. 
 
Did you get your speedometer calibrated? You mentioned adding 1" in the rear, how noticable is your rake with that? My goal was to get rid of my rake.


Just having a hard bed cover helps


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Oh yes, someone is going to be certainly hitting up GM service/ support for a 20 year old truck.
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...