Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Do a diff drop and it'll save your CVs a little bit. Ball joints don't look terrible I think they'll be fine for awhile depending on how you drive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Ok i’ll look for some spacers for the diff drop thank you

Posted

Yea it did , im going to monitor the cv and see how much it holds

Posted

3.5 kit has diff drop spacers. I have heard this newer knuckle 3.5 is a good kit, unlike the control arm version.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Criscone said:

3.5 kit has diff drop spacers. I have heard this newer knuckle 3.5 is a good kit, unlike the control arm version.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So far its holding up good , i like the look and the ride quality and i was able to fit 33s so im happy so far

Posted
49 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:

So did you put the diff drop in already?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea it came with the kit 

Posted
On 01/08/2018 at 2:41 PM, Irving said:

So you went with a RC 5 inch lift after you were running into problems with the 3.5? The truck looks sexy as F**K by the way

I did, its a brand new 5 inch this year from RC, actually widens the front track about 2 inches per side also have to get  a longer front drive shaft which  corrects the cv angles. everything is as it should be now and it rides like stock. Very happy with it and my 295/70r18 tires dont rin anymore lol, anywhere! they measure a 34.5x 12 and look killer! perfect size for the lift

15332514878036099618017541537698.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Dustin Cornish said:

I did, its a brand new 5 inch this year from RC, actually widens the front track about 2 inches per side also have to get  a longer front drive shaft which  corrects the cv angles. everything is as it should be now and it rides like stock. Very happy with it and my 295/70r18 tires dont rin anymore lol, anywhere! they measure a 34.5x 12 and look killer! perfect size for the lift

15332514878036099618017541537698.jpg

Congrats man enjoy your ride ??

  • Like 1
Posted
On 01/08/2018 at 8:33 PM, jgraves13 said:

Do a diff drop and it'll save your CVs a little bit. Ball joints don't look terrible I think they'll be fine for awhile depending on how you drive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

the 3.5" does a diff drop, doesn't help in the slightest 

Posted (edited)
On 02/08/2018 at 7:10 PM, Dustin Cornish said:

I did, its a brand new 5 inch this year from RC, actually widens the front track about 2 inches per side also have to get  a longer front drive shaft which  corrects the cv angles. everything is as it should be now and it rides like stock. Very happy with it and my 295/70r18 tires dont rin anymore lol, anywhere! they measure a 34.5x 12 and look killer! perfect size for the lift

15332514878036099618017541537698.jpg

How does a longer driveshaft correct for cv angles?

Your cv angles should be close to stock with the 5" knuckle lift.

Edited by Tyy1907
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
On 01/08/2018 at 10:10 PM, Criscone said:

3.5 kit has diff drop spacers. I have heard this newer knuckle 3.5 is a good kit, unlike the control arm version.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

From what I understand they've made it so cv boots dont rub the LCA and looks like top balljoint mount for the UCA is angled so balljoints probably last longer.  However the new knuckle doesnt have stock angles (or close to) for UCA or tie rods.  Makes me wonder why they wouldn't try to make even close to stock angles when they go to the trouble of designing new knuckles.  I guess it's one of their budget lifts.  

Edited by Tyy1907
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

That's a cool kit, and 1 of the ones that I considered when looking.  I ended up getting the Superlift 3.5" kit that comes with new new control arms, and doesn't require you to cut the rear crossmember.  Just installed it this weekend, along with a set of Bilstein 5100 shocks set at the factory setting.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
That's a cool kit, and 1 of the ones that I considered when looking.  I ended up getting the Superlift 3.5" kit that comes with new new control arms, and doesn't require you to cut the rear crossmember.  Just installed it this weekend, along with a set of Bilstein 5100 shocks set at the factory setting.

Pics!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...