Jump to content

Need Cat-back for new '03 Silverado


Recommended Posts

Posted

All,

 

I'm brand new to this forum. I hail from the corvetteforum and after my 8/15/03 purchase of an '03 Chevy Silverado Ex Cab Z71, I'm looking for some customization options. So far, I've got a bed liner and chrome step bars. I'm searching for after-cat exhaust systems. Just want folks to know I'm coming but still want to take long trips without getting a headache from the verb's!

 

Thanks for the help and glad y'all are here! :cool:

 

Some info on my 'rado:

 

Victory Red

4.8L Vortec

4 speed auto/OD

Z71 off-road pkg

towing pkg

3.73 gears, locking rear diff

Extend Cab/4 door

 

incredibly quiet.

 

I'm leaning toward Flowmaster 70's. Is there an after-cat Flowmaster 70 kit for my '03?

Posted

You might want to look into the Magnaflow brand for your truck. A coupld of months ago, I just recently put a magnaflow stainless steel muffler and magnaflow stainless steel tips on my 2000 Z71. I love the sound. I also got some 409 grade stainless tubing to complete the system. The exhaust has a nice rumble while accelerating, but quiets out when driving and cruising around. No drone at all when going on long trips. My system was a "custom" system, I purchased and pieced all of the components, but I know that magnaflow makes some bolt on cat-back systmes.

Good luck, and let us know what you decide to use on your truck!

Posted

I picked up the American Thunder system from Jegs.com I believe it comes with a 40 series, but don't quote me on that. It's getting a nice rumble when I coast down hills. By me likey. You might not. Just my $.02

Posted

TED.....Be careful on installing those after market cats!

One of the fellas BDBWTF on the 2500 HD thread here

had his factory warranty voided because of his..............

 

3 dealers told me warranty void if I put a snowplow on any

new GM truck without VYU plow prep. pkg. also.....

 

Check it out!................geo

Posted

Corsa makes a nice kit, not cheap but built very well, you can get the Sport or Touring version, the Touring version has a nice sound without getting on your nerves.

Posted

Hi Ted!

 

I just installed a Gibson cat-back system on my 1999 GMC Sierra,

with great results! At highway speeds, the truck is no louder than

stock....but when pulling away from a stop, it makes a nice deep

tone, but not rediculously loud like some of the Flowmaster systems.

 

Fortunately, I had the opportunity to audition the exhaust first, as a

co-worker put the same exhaust system on his truck.

 

Installation took two hours, and everything fit very well.

All components are mandrel bent and aluminized for longer life.

 

Good luck,

 

Mike

Posted

Dealers can not void a warranty due to changes in the exhaust!!!! :thumbs::nono: They can only do it if the different muffler is causing what is wrong with your truck. Dealers who say things like that are ignorant or stealers!!! Find a new dealer, believe it or not there are a lot of dealer who are very aftermarket friendly. There are some around here that actually sell brand new trucks with lifts on them. As to your muffler question, MAGNAFLOW is really good if you want something that increases HP, sounds good on acceleration and is quiet at an idle. The dual in dual out really opens it up w/o loss of low end torque which seems to be a problem with some systems.

Posted

I'd be thankful for any part numbers for the Gibson, Magnaflow, Corsa, or other brand name cat-back kits. The Gibson system sounds much like what I am seeking (quiet at highway speeds but good sound under acceleration).

 

Thanks all that have responded. Much appreciated! :thumbs:

Posted

I also just had a Gibson exhaust installed on my '02 4.8 Z71. I concur with what Mike P said. It's not obnoxiously loud but it does have a nice, deep rumble when pulling away from a stop. Lately, I've been driving with my windows down just to hear the exhaust.

 

Also, since you're looking for mod ideas, I just installed a K&N FIPK intake with good results.

Posted

I had a Gibson single-in /dual 2.5in. cat back system on my 99 Silverado 5.3.

The system was actually too quiet for me. I ended up having the muffler cut out and replaced it with a Magnaflow. If you want it quiet the Gibson is the way to go. If you want a little sound without being obnoxious go for the Magnaflow.

Posted

FWIW -- Page 17 of the GM Accessories brochure shows a Corsa system that you can buy right through the GM dealership. There is a note that says that accessories are warranted by the individual manufacturers and not by GM dealers, but if it's an approved GM accessory then it won't void your overall warranty. There were no part numbers listed but you can check it out here (scroll down to Page 17):

 

http://www.gmgoodwrench.com/accessories/im...035128265407529

 

 

Scott

Posted
I had a Gibson single-in /dual 2.5in. cat back system on my 99 Silverado 5.3.

The system was actually too quiet for me. I ended up having the muffler cut out and replaced it with a Magnaflow. If you want it quiet the Gibson is the way to go. If you want a little sound without being obnoxious go for the Magnaflow.

which system made more power...both low end and high end?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...