Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys just curious, i was sniffing around the dealer this morning and noticed every 19 on thelot had 3.23 gears, even the AT4, why? Is there a option anymore?  Or are these just standard options, i would think for any decent towing you need 3.42's

Posted
Hey guys just curious, i was sniffing around the dealer this morning and noticed every 19 on thelot had 3.23 gears, even the AT4, why? Is there a option anymore?  Or are these just standard options, i would think for any decent towing you need 3.42's
I noticed it's not even an option to change them through the factory....Not sure what the reasoning is though.

Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk

Posted

Ain’t there only 2 rear end options for all trucks ? 3:42 and 3:23 ? And maybe 3:08? 

 Inthe ford you can get 3:15 , 3:31 , 3:55 and 3:73. Just saying nice to have options. 

 

Posted
Ain’t there only 2 rear end options for all trucks ? 3:42 and 3:23 ? And maybe 3:08? 
 Inthe ford you can get 3:15 , 3:31 , 3:55 and 3:73. Just saying nice to have options. 
 
Not according to the build site...There's no option to select different gears.

Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk

Posted
Has anyone gotten the tow rating on the 19's then?
"6.2-liter V8 engine can tow a maximum 12,500 pounds "

Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk

Posted

323 is pretty much the standard rear gear. I think the 342 rear gear is special to the max tow trucks. With the 8 and 10 speed trans they have more aggresive gearing in the trans vs the old 6 speed. Less rear gear is needed to get things moving. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, smrr1 said:

323 is pretty much the standard rear gear. I think the 342 rear gear is special to the max tow trucks. With the 8 and 10 speed trans they have more aggresive gearing in the trans vs the old 6 speed. Less rear gear is needed to get things moving. 

Meh.. Ram has 3.92's available and their 8 speed  with a deeper first gear (4.71) than the GM 8 speed ( it's 4.56) and basically matching the GM/Ford collaboration 10 speeds 4.70 first gear.  Ford offers 3.73's behind the same 10 speed GM uses... and 4.10's when rolling 35's on the Raptor.  GM is just afraid of adding rear axle ratio... it's not like they are running away with mileage points either because cruising a N/A V8 trying to run on one cylinder at a time is so cool at 1400 rpm lol.  

Posted
1 hour ago, SierraHD17 said:

Meh.. Ram has 3.92's available and their 8 speed  with a deeper first gear (4.71) than the GM 8 speed ( it's 4.56) and basically matching the GM/Ford collaboration 10 speeds 4.70 first gear.  Ford offers 3.73's behind the same 10 speed GM uses... and 4.10's when rolling 35's on the Raptor.  GM is just afraid of adding rear axle ratio... it's not like they are running away with mileage points either because cruising a N/A V8 trying to run on one cylinder at a time is so cool at 1400 rpm lol.  

Oh i agree with you. Was just explainging the question asked. Gm should provide more but they don't and my post is their reason. 8/10 speed with 323 is supposedly equal to the old 342 and 342 equal to the old 373. Disclaimer, i did none of my own research or math. Just passing on info from others who have done the research. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, DTB said:

My 16 5.3 8 speed came with 3.42s. No reason to downgrade go 3.23 other than mpg increases. 

I could be wrong but if it has 342 with 8 speed it is a max tow. Thats the same now for the 2019 too. 

Edited by smrr1
Posted
16 minutes ago, smrr1 said:

I could be wrong but if it has 342 with 8 speed it is a max tow. Thats the same mow for the 2019 too. 

Mine isn’t a NHT max tow. Just an all terrain with 8 speed and 3.42s. So they can’t try the bs about it not being optimized for a lower gear ratio. 

Posted
1 hour ago, DTB said:

Mine isn’t a NHT max tow. Just an all terrain with 8 speed and 3.42s. So they can’t try the bs about it not being optimized for a lower gear ratio. 

I had to go look. I did not realize the 18 and older 5.3 8 spd got 342. I have only looked at the 6.2 the last few years. I just assumed all the 8 spd trucks were 323 standard. Learn something everyday. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 240 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...