Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pig Rich!

 

When Dyson told me the 2400 ran "Pig Rich" as a cause for part of the fuel dilution issues and in addition tail pipes of a bunch of them concurred I was confused. Running monitored AFR's and LFT/STF readings didn't support that. As it turns out my eyes were not lying and neither was the tailpipe. Dyson's comment was just incomplete. Pig rich it is, but not during warm cycle driving. I learned something from a German Engineer friend recently. 

 

I was unaware that OEMS dump fuel during the cold start to preheat the catalyst system.  Yea, burn fuel in the cat to get it hotter quicker. Cold enrichment well beyond that required for smooth cold starts. This is tied to the water temperature. 

 

For some vehicles this is accessible with programing (HP Tuners) and for others not. For those not there are means to trick the water temperature sensor with some interesting resistor arrangements. Can also be done with religious use of block heaters. Getting water temperature up about 20 C will trim enough fuel to kill bore killing over enrichment without interfering with cold starts. The latter method is even EPA/OEM friendly. :) 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Not having a stick option is the only thing that bugs me about the C8. I know it would be slower, blah blah blah…but it just doesn’t seem right for a Corvette.

 

I imagine that at over 1K hp a stick would be suicide from many drivers today. They can back up without a camera or start a stick on hill or parallel park. :crackup:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Pig Rich!

 

When Dyson told me the 2400 ran "Pig Rich" as a cause for part of the fuel dilution issues and in addition tail pipes of a bunch of them concurred I was confused. Running monitored AFR's and LFT/STF readings didn't support that. As it turns out my eyes were not lying and neither was the tailpipe. Dyson's comment was just incomplete. Pig rich it is, but not during warm cycle driving. I learned something from a German Engineer friend recently. 

 

I was unaware that OEMS dump fuel during the cold start to preheat the catalyst system.  Yea, burn fuel in the cat to get it hotter quicker. Cold enrichment well beyond that required for smooth cold starts. This is tied to the water temperature. 

 

For some vehicles this is accessible with programing (HP Tuners) and for others not. For those not there are means to trick the water temperature sensor with some interesting resistor arrangements. Can also be done with religious use of block heaters. Getting water temperature up about 20 C will trim enough fuel to kill bore killing over enrichment without interfering with cold starts. The latter method is even EPA/OEM friendly. :) 

On the other end of the spectrum, my truck also has aggressive cat overtemp protection where it dumps fuel whenever cat temperature reaches an inferred 1701*. Kills power and sends injector duty cycle to the moon. Commanded LAMBDA for WOT at .72. 😳
 

Happens on stock vehicles, but much more frequently for those that add boost without tuning. They don’t realize that their modification often kills power instead of increasing it.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Pig Rich!

 

When Dyson told me the 2400 ran "Pig Rich" as a cause for part of the fuel dilution issues and in addition tail pipes of a bunch of them concurred I was confused. Running monitored AFR's and LFT/STF readings didn't support that. As it turns out my eyes were not lying and neither was the tailpipe. Dyson's comment was just incomplete. Pig rich it is, but not during warm cycle driving. I learned something from a German Engineer friend recently. 

 

I was unaware that OEMS dump fuel during the cold start to preheat the catalyst system.  Yea, burn fuel in the cat to get it hotter quicker. Cold enrichment well beyond that required for smooth cold starts. This is tied to the water temperature. 

 

For some vehicles this is accessible with programing (HP Tuners) and for others not. For those not there are means to trick the water temperature sensor with some interesting resistor arrangements. Can also be done with religious use of block heaters. Getting water temperature up about 20 C will trim enough fuel to kill bore killing over enrichment without interfering with cold starts. The latter method is even EPA/OEM friendly. :) 

That DysonAnalysis guy was a genius. Taking oil analysis data and showing what the engine sees. He comes here periodically. 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Not having a stick option is the only thing that bugs me about the C8. I know it would be slower, blah blah blah…but it just doesn’t seem right for a Corvette.

I’ve been all over the spectrum when it comes to high performance cars. With all the nannies, launch control with heavy insulation to keep out noise. I have my most fun with my wife’s Acura Intagra type r. Hardly any sound deadening. Slammed to the ground. Rides like a rock. But it sticks to the road like nobody’s business. It feels fast going slow on the twisties by my house. You get to use all it has noise and all. And the best part you don’t have to go over the speed limit. These super high horsepower cars. You hit the gas and immediately let off your over the speed limit. As we see with automobile racing. Very few people can handle the horsepower these street cars put out without nannies. You’re paying for all that. You’re not going to use it. You can’t. 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’ve been all over the spectrum when it comes to high performance cars. With all the nannies, launch control with heavy insulation to keep out noise. I have my most fun with my wife’s Acura Intagra type r. Hardly any sound deadening. Slammed to the ground. Rides like a rock. But it sticks to the road like nobody’s business. It feels fast going slow on the twisties by my house. You get to use all it has noise and all. And the best part you don’t have to go over the speed limit. These super high horsepower cars. You hit the gas and immediately let off your over the speed limit. As we see with automobile racing. Very few people can handle the horsepower these street cars put out without nannies. You’re paying for all that. You’re not going to use it. You can’t. 

That damn brand kicked our ass ( GM- Oldsmobile road racing-IMSA-PROSPORTSCAR)  in the late 90's. The R was unbeatable because its handling AND its durability.  

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, customboss said:

That DysonAnalysis guy was a genius. Taking oil analysis data and showing what the engine sees. He comes here periodically. 

 

Are you talking about that pointy-head, know-it-all guy that comes around? I've heard he can be a real bastard.

 

 

🤣🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, customboss said:

That damn brand kicked our ass ( GM- Oldsmobile road racing-IMSA-PROSPORTSCAR)  in the late 90's. The R was unbeatable because its handling AND its durability.  

When my wife got it in 2001. My brothers and I really laughed at the thing coming from muscle cars. Didn’t really care about road racing. I’ve read lately it’s the best handling front drive. I’m not capable of driving it to its limits. My experience is driving off the rear tires. Handling wasn’t my thing. Horsepower is. Then my wife gets a rear drive sports sedan. That does it all. I appreciate the handling stuff a lot more now. All wheel drive changes the game. Real talent is making front drives go fast through corners, especially using the hand brake too. I’m past my prime to try to learn that. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, txab said:

Are you talking about that pointy-head, know-it-all guy that comes around? I've heard he can be a real bastard.

 

 

🤣🤣

XACTLY 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Information is only useful if you get all of it. :idiot:I got the 'what' was happening. Never go the 'WHY' it was happening. Then got sent down a dozen rabbit holes that had nothing to do with WHY. :mad: Prolonged the issue to failure and never, until today, get the WHY from another source. 

 

Rains coming?

 

When? Where?

 

:dunno:

 

:rollin:

  • Sad 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Information is only useful if you get all of it. :idiot:I got the 'what' was happening. Never go the 'WHY' it was happening. Then got sent down a dozen rabbit holes that had nothing to do with WHY. :mad: Prolonged the issue to failure and never, until today, get the WHY from another source. 

 

Rains coming?

 

When? Where?

 

:dunno:

 

:rollin:

Poor baby! 

Posted

Groomer texts today and says I'd missed an appointment that morning for Rex. I begged forgiveness and told her that I was distracted with loosing a pet the previous day and wasn't quite myself. Actually this exchanged happened while driving and I had the Mrs. text her back with that response.

 

She offered condolences and said if I got there right away she would fit him in OR she would schedule him in for this Wednesday at 9 A.M. This text I let the car read to us. I ask the wife to text her back asking for the Wednesday appointment. 

 

Wifey says, "What time?"

 

"9 A.M." I reply. 

 

She asks, " How do you know she has a opening at that time, shouldn't you ask first?"

 

"Oh I don't know dear...perhaps because she said 9 A.M.?"

 

"No she didn't. Never mentioned a time" and shot the death stare at me. 

 

Puzzled I ask her to read the text chain back to me. 

 

She does and gets quite. I continue, "Not only did you just hear her when the car read the text, you read it to me just a few minutes ago.....".....I let that trail off into silence. We had just had this argument the night before about our cats medical condition. I heard the doctor say XYZ and she didn't and because she didn't....it didn't happen. 

 

I'm not telling this story to pick on my wife. She got the point right away and I had the text and the voice over to stand as witness.  Everyone does this. 

 

I have the tapes and the emails. I'm not guessing about what I did or didn't hear or read. I'm not getting baited into having a conversation with a person I have ignored so I can be told what I have on tape wasn't said or implied.

 

End of exchange.... 

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted

Syphilis and Motor Oil

 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3109405/ [Rustam I Aminov ]

 

Did you just spit your coffee on the screen? :crackup:It's a history on Antibiotics. History that is unadulterated and unpruned. 

 

Our history is littered with examples of uneducated, simple people who make fools of those with a dozen Doctorates. Sometimes by happenstance. Sometimes by keen observation and in intense desire to know a thing completely. Autodidacts.   There are also dozens of cases where in such knowledge is refined by those educated types in ways and with means the commoner hasn't access to and yet, the common man, his stupid little wanderings are the bedrock of knowledge. Accurate to the degree required for ample results even unrefined.

 

One of my favorites in this paper is the Red Earth of the Jordan River area where simple people rubbed the clay on their skins to cure certain dermal infections. Reminded me of my mother peeing in the dirt (ammonia) to make a paste for bee stings when we were camping to draw the venom as the clay dried. Pulls the stinger too. Damn Arkansas Hillbilly. 

 

One method is of itself not the story, not the process and not superior over another. 

 

The next time you scoff at some beggar rubbing red Jordan clay on his skin while you are taking  actinomycin C3 as a cancer treatment, might want to check that distain at the door and thank that beggar for his contribution. Then laugh at the PhD who acts like he discovered it and is all knowing. Then thank him too after slapping down that kind of arrogance. 

 

What is the tie to motor oil? Even a beggar can figure that out. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,716 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...