Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A tale of two TRXs.

 

Mine on mile 40 of a highway run in 90 deg heat. IMG_3931.thumb.jpeg.18a285ae2cd4d3ef67f266ee6e2f34d6.jpeg

Oil: 199 (Red Line 5w50 just installed)

Coolant: 185

ATF: 165

 

Meanwhile this is what most people think is OK:IMG_3933.thumb.jpeg.c2f7da326ce96472b7f502a41510fbf4.jpeg

ATF: 214

Coolant: 234

Oil: 286! (Factory approved 0w40, gotta save that warranty).

 

The fluid temps were well within allowed range. 286 may seem high but it was for a short period and is OK with fully synthetics. TRX has safety limits, which were beyond these temps.” 
 

What’s the safety limit? Punching a rod through the oil pan to add extra ventilation? 😂

 

We’re getting beyond blind faith in the OEs and into pure ignorance at this point.


I heard an analogy somewhere that I liked. Imagine your body had a full warranty for 40 years. Would you smoke 3 packs a day and eat only McDonalds because all your medical expenses were covered for that time? Of course not because what happens on year 41? Vehicle warranty is no different. Factory spec oil is often the McDonalds, and those operating temperatures are the chain smoking. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 minute ago, OnTheReel said:

A tale of two TRXs.

 

Mine on mile 40 of a highway run in 90 deg heat. IMG_3931.thumb.jpeg.18a285ae2cd4d3ef67f266ee6e2f34d6.jpeg

Oil: 199 (Red Line 5w50 just installed)

Coolant: 185

ATF: 165

 

Meanwhile this is what most people think is OK:IMG_3933.thumb.jpeg.c2f7da326ce96472b7f502a41510fbf4.jpeg

ATF: 214

Coolant: 234

Oil: 286! (Factory approved 0w40, gotta save that warranty).

 

The fluid temps were well within allowed range. 286 may seem high but it was for a short period and is OK with fully synthetics. TRX has safety limits, which were beyond these temps.” 
 

What’s the safety limit? Punching a rod through the oil pan to add extra ventilation? 😂

 

We’re getting beyond blind faith in the OEs and into pure ignorance at this point.


I heard an analogy somewhere that I liked. Imagine your body had a full warranty for 40 years. Would you smoke 3 packs a day and eat only McDonalds because all your medical expenses were covered for that time? Of course not because what happens on year 41? Vehicle warranty is no different. Factory spec oil is often the McDonalds, and those operating temperatures are the chain smoking. 

That’s certainly compelling

Posted
22 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

A tale of two TRXs.

 

Mine on mile 40 of a highway run in 90 deg heat. IMG_3931.thumb.jpeg.18a285ae2cd4d3ef67f266ee6e2f34d6.jpeg

Oil: 199 (Red Line 5w50 just installed)

Coolant: 185

ATF: 165

 

Meanwhile this is what most people think is OK:IMG_3933.thumb.jpeg.c2f7da326ce96472b7f502a41510fbf4.jpeg

ATF: 214

Coolant: 234

Oil: 286! (Factory approved 0w40, gotta save that warranty).

 

The fluid temps were well within allowed range. 286 may seem high but it was for a short period and is OK with fully synthetics. TRX has safety limits, which were beyond these temps.” 
 

What’s the safety limit? Punching a rod through the oil pan to add extra ventilation? 😂

 

We’re getting beyond blind faith in the OEs and into pure ignorance at this point.


I heard an analogy somewhere that I liked. Imagine your body had a full warranty for 40 years. Would you smoke 3 packs a day and eat only McDonalds because all your medical expenses were covered for that time? Of course not because what happens on year 41? Vehicle warranty is no different. Factory spec oil is often the McDonalds, and those operating temperatures are the chain smoking. 

 

 

Some observations there though. 

 

The second dash.  Tow/Haul is on which IMO implies that truck was towing and is spinning 3000rpm where your truck was 70mph, I assume not towing and in 8th at under 2000rpm.  

 

So two trucks in two different scenarios which would...have a sway in temperature readings.  

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

Some observations there though. 

 

The second dash.  Tow/Haul is on which IMO implies that truck was towing and is spinning 3000rpm where your truck was 70mph, I assume not towing and in 8th at under 2000rpm.  

 

So two trucks in two different scenarios which would...have a sway in temperature readings.  

 

 

Fair. But the point was more his nonchalant reaction (or really no reaction at all) to running those temperatures. It’s normalized, and even worse some people actually think it’s BETTER.

 

His truck still has the factory warranty using approved fluids, and stock thermostat & TBV. My truck doesn’t. Which one would you want to buy used?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

Some observations there though. 

 

The second dash.  Tow/Haul is on which IMO implies that truck was towing and is spinning 3000rpm where your truck was 70mph, I assume not towing and in 8th at under 2000rpm.  

 

So two trucks in two different scenarios which would...have a sway in temperature readings.  

 

 

 

Again as true as that is what it shows is the truck is not set up for towing. @OnTheReel 's dash would be what it should look like towing as well. 

 

***************************************

General comments to attached to the newdude quote: 

 

 

Physics doesn't leave the room when it's towing or on track day. Thermostat doesn't do cooling, it does regulating. If the cooler is WAY to large for day in and day out task the thermostat keeps it warm enough. If the thermostat is defeated by a cooler to small then it needs enough cooler to put it in control. 

 

When I first bought Pepper my dash looked like #2 on a hot day doing 55 mph. Not quite that bad but you get the idea. I took steps to get to the OneTheReel dash look and it does quite well up to over 90 F air temps. Even with all the modifications I would need more to tow or run the Mexican deserts. 

 

GM gives us a 'starter kit' and a darn poor one at that. 

Posted
2 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

What’s the safety limit? Punching a rod through the oil pan to add extra ventilation? 😂

 

We’re getting beyond blind faith in the OEs and into pure ignorance at this point.

 

Somewhere we got the notion that getting away with something was the same as it not being a problem. Like the drunk who drives because he's to drunk to walk and because he never hits anything over a long span of time comes to believe that his behavior is harmless. If rods aren't hanging out, we're good, right? :crackup:

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

A tale of two TRXs.

 

Mine on mile 40 of a highway run in 90 deg heat. IMG_3931.thumb.jpeg.18a285ae2cd4d3ef67f266ee6e2f34d6.jpeg

Oil: 199 (Red Line 5w50 just installed)

Coolant: 185

ATF: 165

 

I'm officially jealous. I can hit those numbers in that temperature, just not at 701 mph. I have work to do. 😉 

Posted
On 6/22/2025 at 5:25 AM, KARNUT said:

I’m an old guy. My memory is vivid from the 60s on. We had plenty of cars and trucks being a large family. Mostly GMs some Fords. Factually speaking. Even at 3K oil changes during that time. We without a doubt as a family and business. Have more vehicles passing mileage we’d only dream of back in the old days. It took me until recently to trust a vehicle passing 150K miles. That’s average for me now. I only recently stopped going extended with oil changes. Only because my driving changed. Sure there’s experimental engines that shorten engine life. As a rule generally the manufacturers that do it right have longevity. Even at their recommend extended drains. Simple buy those. But generally they all last longer than the old days. Well almost all. 

 

For sure. Hitting 188k on a fullsize pickup without engine or trans failure isn't exactly amazing. Was it the hundreds/thousands of hours of forum posts and obsessing over temperatures the magic potion? The guy who drives 40k per year and doesn't always change the oil on time but close enough, and when he does, tosses the keys to "Shop who uses bulk oil" seems to have about the same success rate overall.

 

...And if something major does break... fix it? Or buy a new one.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I'm officially jealous. I can hit those numbers in that temperature, just not at 701 mph. I have work to do. 😉 

Truck has a ton of cooling from factory. They just made poor decisions to use it. I’d be running 205-215 coolant, oil and ATF when stock in the same conditions.
 

I pulled the OEM trans TBV and found it’s the same part number used on V6 Challengers and Chargers which was an odd choice. 1/2” lines and a big cooler don’t mean squat when you’re necked down to 1/4” at the outlet of the TBV. A TBV that is set to open way too late as well.IMG_3957.thumb.jpeg.1c2b3cc95bab48725a88a039cabad444.jpeg

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

 

For sure. Hitting 188k on a fullsize pickup without engine or trans failure isn't exactly amazing. Was it the hundreds/thousands of hours of forum posts and obsessing over temperatures the magic potion? The guy who drives 40k per year and doesn't always change the oil on time but close enough, and when he does, tosses the keys to "Shop who uses bulk oil" seems to have about the same success rate overall.

 

...And if something major does break... fix it? Or buy a new one.

The biggest change for us in the 80s was Amsoil. That was in engines, transmission and Hydraulic. Lower temperatures that led to higher working oil pressure and more tolerances to heat. We double the hours for oil changes with our equipment in the field. Our first test vehicle a 1988 7.3 with the C-6 transmission. After a transmission rebuild at 100K miles we added another 185K before we traded it in no other failures. The only change was Amsoil. At the same time we went extended on fluids per their instructions. Some people claim results with one or two vehicles. Our results are many years with many vehicles. Of course if you buy vehicles that are not well built you have to adjust to more frequent oil changes. I even have stopped going extreme extended. If I was running the interstate like I used to I would be going more extended. Most of the problems with the engines and transmissions today are build quality. Sometimes more frequent oil changes help that. I just buy vehicles that are more reliable. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

For sure. Hitting 188k on a fullsize pickup without engine or trans failure isn't exactly amazing. Was it the hundreds/thousands of hours of forum posts and obsessing over temperatures the magic potion? The guy who drives 40k per year and doesn't always change the oil on time but close enough, and when he does, tosses the keys to "Shop who uses bulk oil" seems to have about the same success rate overall.

 

...And if something major does break... fix it? Or buy a new one.

 

 Failure? That's your bar? :nonod:  Describe what success means to you.

 

Are you one of those people that thinks you can say a thing true? It is because you 'says' it is? 

 

Apples, oranges, it's all fruit, right? City dweller and OTR all the same pot of fish. 

 

As long as I've been here the goal post is always moving further along. Won't go 80K without using oil. It did. Won't go 100K without a lifter failure. It did. Trans wont make it past warranty. It did. Lifetime is 150K you sure, Yep. TSB on rings says you are on borrowed time. Catch can or die. It didn't. Still waiting for the cam/lifters/rings to fail. Still waiting for it to use oil. In fact I'm still waiting for deposits to form. (168K)

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5892e80aa9ca969595c572462de83b5.jpeg

 

Open yours up and lets have a look at success. 

 

I replaced that piece of plastic around the starter. That's been my non-routine maintenance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

It’s amazing how a bear comes out of his cave and preaches what everyone success should be. I’m happy with 200K and 20 years max. Some people it’s 10 years. That would be about 150K miles. I run my mower about 10 years. I usually run my appliances about 10 years. I don’t want drama and I can afford it. My kids will get plenty when I pass. All this talk about super high mileage. I have more high mileage vehicles than the bear. I’m normal with oil changes. My toy is a Acura Type R. G-4 I rather die. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 Failure? That's your bar? :nonod:  Describe what success means to you.

 

Are you one of those people that thinks you can say a thing true? It is because you 'says' it is? 

 

Apples, oranges, it's all fruit, right? City dweller and OTR all the same pot of fish. 

 

As long as I've been here the goal post is always moving further along. Won't go 80K without using oil. It did. Won't go 100K without a lifter failure. It did. Trans wont make it past warranty. It did. Lifetime is 150K you sure, Yep. TSB on rings says you are on borrowed time. Catch can or die. It didn't. Still waiting for the cam/lifters/rings to fail. Still waiting for it to use oil. In fact I'm still waiting for deposits to form. (168K)

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5892e80aa9ca969595c572462de83b5.jpeg

 

Open yours up and lets have a look at success. 

 

I replaced that piece of plastic around the starter. That's been my non-routine maintenance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mine has 213 miles. No reason to crack the valve covers.

 

Success for me is happiness. Very little to do with owning a truck or showing everyone how my top end is clean at 168k. I've seen and owned engines that have gone more miles and they're still clean. Some of them didn't even use synthetic for most of their miles. So I'm not really sure what your point is? A modern engine going 168k with regular changes is frankly...unremarkable.

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Mine has 213 miles. No reason to crack the valve covers.

 

Success for me is happiness. Very little to do with owning a truck or showing everyone how my top end is clean at 168k. I've seen and owned engines that have gone more miles and they're still clean. Some of them didn't even use synthetic for most of their miles. So I'm not really sure what your point is? A modern engine going 168k with regular changes is frankly...unremarkable.

👏

Posted

I happen to really like the fleet I have currently. And I modify and drive them hard. Success for me is having wear rates much lower than universal averages in spite of that. Simply by paying attention to many of the same things Grump preaches. You can dislike his delivery or just not care about your vehicles as much he does. But that doesn’t change what I’ve tested and observed on my own vehicles. 

  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,716 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...