Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 12/11/2025 at 8:24 AM, Atlas said:

On a positive note, I'm about to save a bunch of money on car insurance.

 

It's been a month of dealing with a minor claim on my SS and it's still unresolved and work on the car hasn't begun, and now can't begin until next year. I've had to babysit and keep the whole process on course which isn't remarkable for a modern claims handling experience. But there's been an extra level of stupidity, and y'all know how much stupidity thrills me.

 

I stand to save about $1k/year by moving 3 of the cars over to Hagerty. I doubt the claims handling is any better, but at least it will be cheaper. The quote/sales side of Hagerty has been a breath of fresh air (isn't it almost always, when someone is trying to get you to buy or sign up for something?).

 

I've absolutely loved their Youtube content (Jason Cammisa) as a side note. Their content gets ya right in the 'car guy' if you know what I mean!

Hagerty KICKS ASS you have to store em in a locked garage and not drive em much, but agreed upon STATED value is much better than some jackasses idea of value.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, johnnyquick said:

I look at a lot of people and don't see intelligent design.

 

Then Atlas, I submit that you are looking at the wrong part of humans and the natural world in general. 

 

Sorry @Johnnyquick. Proxy fire.  

Posted
9 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Then Atlas, I submit that you are looking at the wrong part of humans and the natural world in general. 

 

Sorry @Johnnyquick. Proxy fire.  

 

Someone who is religious would naturally want to defend their views. I reject that anything about an intelligent design would originate from a jealous, spiteful narcissist, except for maybe human nature / the human condition itself. Biology, and Life itself appears to be more trial-and-error than anything planned or foreseen. And that's part of what makes it beautiful/fragile.

 

I think you took a lighthearted and cheeky statement and turned it into a philosophical one.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Humans by nature are doubtful. We have to see it to believe it. I see it everywhere. It’s easier to believe in intelligent design than all this just happened. So the alternative is all this just evolved? No I don’t think so. Do I understand it? No. Having faith is better than not. Usually faith produces good. The battle of good and evil is everywhere. I rather interact with a church group than at a bar. The odds of a good outcome are much better.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Humans by nature are doubtful. We have to see it to believe it. I see it everywhere. It’s easier to believe in intelligent design than all this just happened. So the alternative is all this just evolved? No I don’t think so. Do I understand it? No. Having faith is better than not. Usually faith produces good. The battle of good and evil is everywhere. I rather interact with a church group than at a bar. The odds of a good outcome are much better.

 

Your inability to think with any real breadth and granularity always makes me laugh, Stan. It's not "intelligent design" or else, just chaos, and nothing else. The choice isn't only between hanging out with church friends, or bar friends (nonsecular, or, presumably secular). But this is what you've been trained to believe in your binary world. Some people need that simplicity and reassurance.

 

In fact, I don't believe that most humans are doubtful by nature. You are a shining example of someone who doesn't appear doubtful on many issues including ones where evidence is in plain sight.

Edited by Atlas
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Atlas said:

 

Your inability to think with any real breadth and granularity always makes me laugh, Stan. It's not "intelligent design" or else, just chaos, and nothing else. The choice isn't only between hanging out with church friends, or bar friends (nonsecular, or, presumably nonsecular). But this is what you've been trained to believe in your binary world. Some people need that simplicity and reassurance.

I find it amusing that certain people will post hearsay rather than facts daily. Accusing  without evidence with hearsay. Especially when that person has been investigated with now proven false information. But refuse to even entertain the possibility of intelligent design like they’re all knowing. My life has been anything but normal. I could write a best seller. Like usual you assume without an ounce of facts. My life has been anything but simple. But fun it has been, and rewarding. You just provide me with humor.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Someone who is religious would naturally want to defend their views. I reject that anything about an intelligent design would originate from a jealous, spiteful narcissist, except for maybe human nature / the human condition itself. Biology, and Life itself appears to be more trial-and-error than anything planned or foreseen. And that's part of what makes it beautiful/fragile.

 

I think you took a lighthearted and cheeky statement and turned it into a philosophical one.

 

If that is indeed how you see God then I understand why you take the position you have. No one responds well to spiteful jealous narcissistic people. May I ask how you came to this conclusion? 

 

Tell ya what, I'm taking you off 'ignore' for a bit. Seems fair as I am asking for the exchange. Feel free to PM me if that feels more appropriate or safer. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

If that is indeed how you see God then I understand why you take the position you have. No one responds well to spiteful jealous narcissistic people. May I ask how you came to this conclusion? 

 

Tell ya what, I'm taking you off 'ignore' for a bit. Seems fair as I am asking for the exchange. Feel free to PM me if that feels more appropriate or safer. 

 

Fair. I'll PM when I have a few minutes to sit down and explain my conclusions.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Atlas said:

Side note... has anyone checked on @txab lately? Did he quit? Or, hopefully just away enjoying the Holidays?

I vote it’s the holidays. Certainly he would have been active here in the last week otherwise.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Atlas said:

Side note... has anyone checked on @txab lately? Did he quit? Or, hopefully just away enjoying the Holidays?

I forgot to check on him too…….was worried too but he’s fine, we just connected and he’s taking Xmas new years mental health days from Stan and me!!! 
 

Seriously!  just staying away from computer for holidays. He will return to delete 90% of what we post. 🤣

Edited by customboss
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I vote it’s the holidays. Certainly he would have been active here in the last week otherwise.

You were right Stan. You are correct!! Right! 🎅

Posted
6 minutes ago, customboss said:

You were right Stan. You are correct!! Right! 🎅

I’m done the politics here. There’s no common ground. The TDS is real and there’s no cure. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’m done the politics here. There’s no common ground. The TDS is real and there’s no cure. 

You’re done but you use a political term coined by the insecure. OK 

 

PhilB turned me on to GES which is what I have. 
 

IMG_0616.thumb.jpeg.2e59a7d96b723dd594a60972fe8904a1.jpeg

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...