Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

If I remember correctly, windows down is more efficient below 55 mph and A/C is more efficient above 55 mph. Thinking back now, I can't decide if their test method was flawed or not, as they ran the A/C full blast, requiring the driver to wear a parka.

I do recall the test was on a nascar track or asphalt oval if memory serves me correctly.

  • Like 1
Posted

Draft Semi’s on the highway. 20-40% increase in mpg.

 

Gasoline is E15 now. Googling says, a 1.5% mpg loss..or 0.3mpg loss. We all have to see if it is true  over the next few months.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 5/30/2019 at 11:56 AM, Grinnen said:

Nobody ever understands what Octane does. 

The higher the octane the higher the ignition temperature. Some vehicles, mainly older ones, require a higher octane due to pre-ignition because of how engine heat is concentrated in areas, or to stop it from igniting in the cylinder (again, because of heat) before the spark sets it off. That's it, that's all. Nothing magic about a higher octane unless you've changed your engine/ignition system in a significant way that makes it require a higher octane.

Proper truck geometry will net the highest gains. When they are tested in the wind tunnel and configured for aerodynamics they are flat, as in no tires and held on a lift/table. When they are sold they have that rake added because of the suspension which is meant to carry heavy loads in the rear. Just installing a level kit added almost 1km/liter to my mileage. I've been tracking it for a long time via fill ups, the trucks trip recordings and calculations.

I went from 12.4L/100km to 11.6L/100km  (22-23MPG to 25-26MPG). You can call me out on this if you desire, but I don't care. I'm passing along my experience.

- A tonneau cover will help mileage on the factory suspension because it covers the open bed which destroys any aerodynamics when the trucks ass is in the air. When level it doesn't do a lot.

- Alignment : if they aren't tracking properly this can really affect mileage


- Tires : Not a larger tire but more the tread pattern will affect MPG. I went on my older vehicle (AMC Eagle with full Jeep drivetrain swap) from a street tire to a luggy as hell AT tire and lost about 1/5 of my mileage. But meh.


- Accessories : Ever see those ugly ass fender flares that some places sell that stick out 3-4" to cover the tire? Morons with huge spoilers on their Cavaliers and Sunfires that only work if you're capable of 170 miles an hour? Yeah..may as well add a parachute to the rear.


- Lift kits : they can affect mileage but only because of the larger disproportionate tires needing more horsies to turn and causing a bit of wind resistance. The lift in itself leaves vehicle geometry the same. However if the vehicle was designed to squat at higher speeds a lift kit will ruin it...but that's not what a pickup was designed for. 

- Vehicles learn how a person drives and over time will adapt to this for the best MPG. If you swap drivers this can affect it initially but over time it will adapt.


In the end your driving a 5000 pound 6' tall brick, with great capability and usefulness. You'll never achieve amazing mileage
 

 

Posted

try running 91 octane and drop the tailgate, inflate tires 40 psi. and drive using the MPG gragh display while using v4 as much as possible,  if you can find premium fuel with 0 ethanol than this gives amaizing results, i got over 560 miles on a full tank[22 gal] doing this

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...