Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2 - KYB SR4544 loaded struts from RockAuto would be $300 delivered to my door. It's tempting just for my edification. 

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, lucas287 said:

2 - KYB SR4544 loaded struts from RockAuto would be $300 delivered to my door. It's tempting just for my edification. 

If you decide to go this way I for one would love to know the outcome of your experiment. I have Bilstein 4600's with about 8000 miles on them if that much I would be giving up but I'd like to know about the ride. Expansion joints are rough in my truck.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Called Bilstein again. This time about the 6112 kit for 2015-2018 Tahoes/Yukon. The spring rate on that kit is 600#. That's quite a bit lower than the Silverado kit. Maybe too low. Also, I noticed that kit provides .25" less lift potential than the Silverado kit. Makes me think that Bilstein tuned that setup for ultimate comfort and lowered the spring rate accordingly, which inversely lowered the max lift potential. 

 

If you put this set on a Silverado, and set it at max height, you'd probably pick up .9-1" of ride height but have a much softer spring. Would it wallow and feel like a boat? Highly doubt that when you have such a massive shock piston to dampen motion. 

Edited by lucas287
  • Thanks 1
Posted

RCSB 4.3 is the point of reference for the remainder. Weight is a scaled 5,000 lbs with 50/50 bias. I use scales not the book values.  The extra weight is a Line-X and cover on the back half. (Uses a 2" drop bell knuckle) Again for your reference. 

 

King OEM on both ends. Front spring comes 750#. OEM has 4" of shock travel and a 2:1 wheel ratio or 8" of travel. King has 1/2 inch more shock travel, 9" wheel travel.  Again reference.

 

With this spring and zero pre-load I had 1 inch shock, 2" of wheel rebound so it hit the upper stops often. I changed springs to 600#, Kings next step down on this setup. This lowered the set up with zero pre-load to 1/2" above mid stroke. I now have 4" at the wheel in rebound and 5" in compression. Reference N2 pressure is 250#. Yea, that is the factory setting. Shim pack is 12-flutter-12 and shock oil is King medium. This last part is standard King. 

 

I took a bunch of castor out of it which helped the expansion joint jolt. Now around 2* with proper L/R bias. 

 

Front is firm but not harsh at 35 psi tire pressure, 250# N2 pressure and Bridgestone Dueller HT. Shock uses 90% of the total travel. I use wire ties on the rods to measure this. It is not "Boaty" at all. 

 

Out back the same valving on 150# N2 and a Deaver built spring pack 15% softer and 2" less arch. The 1.25 spacer is removed. On the hard stuff it will hit the bumper in compression. You have to land it pretty hard. I could fix this with a remote reservoir shock instead of the 'piggy back' set up and reclaim around 2" of compression travel shortening the bump stop. 

 

I believe the front can be more car like by using 500# springs and some pre-load to restore ride height but it would give away some travel.  A larger sway bar or a solid one would hold the roll in check. Modified valving perhaps for bounce control. 

 

Had I given it more thought I might have tried removing the middle and overload spring before having Deaver build a set. See where that put the ride height then adjusted with de-arc, shim or shackle to suit the drop. If I wanted to carry heavy, bag it. 

 

Anyway just some 'been there, done that' information you might find useful. 

 

Thing is using a shock like King, Fox, Viking etc. you have KNOWN spring rates and a great deal of interchange flexibility.

 

Thank You Ben Brazda at Filthy Motorsport for the assist on the sorting this out.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

@Grumpy Bear Thank you for that info! Good numbers, good personal experience. I find it a bit hard to believe that my CCSB 4x4 L86/8L90 combo only weighs 400# more than your truck! Guess I need to find a scale around here and figure it out the right way. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, lucas287 said:

@Grumpy Bear Thank you for that info! Good numbers, good personal experience. I find it a bit hard to believe that my CCSB 4x4 L86/8L90 combo only weighs 400# more than your truck! Guess I need to find a scale around here and figure it out the right way. 

I carry extra in spray in bed liner and cover remember. My spring packs / shocks out back are heavier too. Sulastic shackles are heavier. Step bar. Penny's make dollars and about now I'm 500 over as delivered. If you know anyone that does dirt cars they should have a 4 wheel scales for this sort of setup. Otherwise a grain elevator is pretty good. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Grumpy Bear said:

I carry extra in spray in bed liner and cover remember. My spring packs / shocks out back are heavier too. Sulastic shackles are heavier. Step bar. Penny's make dollars and about now I'm 500 over as delivered. If you know anyone that does dirt cars they should have a 4 wheel scales for this sort of setup. Otherwise a grain elevator is pretty good. 

And I've got a spray in bedliner and power running boards too! 

 

Not many dirt tracks or grain elevators in my neck of the woods :) But lots of speed shops though that I could call around to and see. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

lucas287, what about the 2WD Suburban application, SR4545? It might be a good medium between the 2WD Tahoe and 4WD Suburban applications.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, NoLand said:

lucas287, what about the 2WD Suburban application, SR4545? It might be a good medium between the 2WD Tahoe and 4WD Suburban applications.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This has been on the back burner simmering while I sort through some driveline vibes. But, if I had to put my money on it today, I think you're spot on. I'd go with the 4545 units. KYB told me they are brand new on the market so most distributors dont have them yet. For $350 to get new upper mounts, dust covers, softer springs, and monotube shocks...seems like a steal. Some may poo poo on Gas-a-just but in my experience they are good shocks. Heck even monroe reflex monotubes are good. On my NBS Silverado I used about 6 different brands of shocks, including Bilstein, til I discovered the reflex monotubes rode the best. And if they only last 5 years/60,000 miles....oh well....most of us get bored anyway and start looking for things to do.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 6/3/2020 at 10:23 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

RCSB 4.3 is the point of reference for the remainder. Weight is a scaled 5,000 lbs with 50/50 bias. I use scales not the book values.  The extra weight is a Line-X and cover on the back half. (Uses a 2" drop bell knuckle) Again for your reference. 

 
 
 

 

King OEM on both ends. Front spring comes 750#. OEM has 4" of shock travel and a 2:1 wheel ratio or 8" of travel. King has 1/2 inch more shock travel, 9" wheel travel.  Again reference.

 

With this spring and zero pre-load I had 1 inch shock, 2" of wheel rebound so it hit the upper stops often. I changed springs to 600#, Kings next step down on this setup. This lowered the set up with zero pre-load to 1/2" above mid stroke. I now have 4" at the wheel in rebound and 5" in compression. Reference N2 pressure is 250#. Yea, that is the factory setting. Shim pack is 12-flutter-12 and shock oil is King medium. This last part is standard King. 

 

I took a bunch of castor out of it which helped the expansion joint jolt. Now around 2* with proper L/R bias. 

 

Front is firm but not harsh at 35 psi tire pressure, 250# N2 pressure and Bridgestone Dueller HT. Shock uses 90% of the total travel. I use wire ties on the rods to measure this. It is not "Boaty" at all. 

 

Out back the same valving on 150# N2 and a Deaver built spring pack 15% softer and 2" less arch. The 1.25 spacer is removed. On the hard stuff it will hit the bumper in compression. You have to land it pretty hard. I could fix this with a remote reservoir shock instead of the 'piggy back' set up and reclaim around 2" of compression travel shortening the bump stop. 

 

I believe the front can be more car like by using 500# springs and some pre-load to restore ride height but it would give away some travel.  A larger sway bar or a solid one would hold the roll in check. Modified valving perhaps for bounce control. 

 

Had I given it more thought I might have tried removing the middle and overload spring before having Deaver build a set. See where that put the ride height then adjusted with de-arc, shim or shackle to suit the drop. If I wanted to carry heavy, bag it. 

 

Anyway just some 'been there, done that' information you might find useful. 

 

Thing is using a shock like King, Fox, Viking etc. you have KNOWN spring rates and a great deal of interchange flexibility.

 

Thank You Ben Brazda at Filthy Motorsport for the assist on the sorting this out.  

Grumpy, I think I'm gonna try removing the middle leaf and keeping the overload. Concurrently I'll install some legit traction bars ad they'll be needed even more. 

Posted
10 hours ago, lucas287 said:

Grumpy, I think I'm gonna try removing the middle leaf and keeping the overload. Concurrently I'll install some legit traction bars ad they'll be needed even more. 

Let me know how that works out! :)  How much does it affect the ride? PM me please. I will forget I asked this. 

  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 6/3/2020 at 9:19 AM, lucas287 said:

Called Bilstein again. This time about the 6112 kit for 2015-2018 Tahoes/Yukon. The spring rate on that kit is 600#. That's quite a bit lower than the Silverado kit. Maybe too low. Also, I noticed that kit provides .25" less lift potential than the Silverado kit. Makes me think that Bilstein tuned that setup for ultimate comfort and lowered the spring rate accordingly, which inversely lowered the max lift potential. 

 

If you put this set on a Silverado, and set it at max height, you'd probably pick up .9-1" of ride height but have a much softer spring. Would it wallow and feel like a boat? Highly doubt that when you have such a massive shock piston to dampen motion. 

Anything come of this?

 

This is some really good info.  I've also considered using lighter front springs, like a 2wd Silverado springs or something.  Even when my truck (2018 z71, crew / short box) was new it didn't have as much rake as some of the Silverado's I see on the road making me think mine has firmer springs.  

 

Currently I have Bilstein 5100's at the 1.2" front lift, Sulastic rear shackles and Cooper at3 285/70r17 (P metric).  I'm going to ditch my At3's for some Michelin 275/65r18's on my oem z71 wheels and then look at replacing my front suspension if needed.  To add, you can get a lower strut spacer for 1/2" or 1" of lift so even if you lost a tad bit of height that spacer would put you back where you need to be.

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, Yondu said:

Anything come of this?

 

This is some really good info.  I've also considered using lighter front springs, like a 2wd Silverado springs or something.  Even when my truck (2018 z71, crew / short box) was new it didn't have as much rake as some of the Silverado's I see on the road making me think mine has firmer springs.  

 

Currently I have Bilstein 5100's at the 1.2" front lift, Sulastic rear shackles and Cooper at3 285/70r17 (P metric).  I'm going to ditch my At3's for some Michelin 275/65r18's on my oem z71 wheels and then look at replacing my front suspension if needed.  To add, you can get a lower strut spacer for 1/2" or 1" of lift so even if you lost a tad bit of height that spacer would put you back where you need to be.

Hey man. Nope, never actually did any of this. Found a great deal on a set of Koni shocks and bought them for all four corners. They ride very nicely! Especially the rears comparing them to the Bilsteins I had back there. NIGHT AND DAY softer than the Bilsteins. I've had several road trips with good weight in the bed too and the Koni's never seems stressed. Great shocks. 

 

The fronts, though, they didn't quite transform the front suspension to be super compliant. I think that's the springs. I can attest that the damn front springs are super stiff when swapping them over the Koni's. 

 

I ended up removing my front sway bar to see how the ride would be with more travel and less spring rate (a sway bar effectively increases spring rate and limits travel BTW) and the results were subtle but very nice. One could hardly call it harsh in nearly any scenario. But the downside is that there is increased roll and certain undulations on the freeway mean you have to pay more attention. Based on this experiment I would say that softer springs would help and also a setup that has more travel would help too. It's expensive, but I would probably entertain a coilover conversion just to get more travel which means you can use a lower spring rate right off the bat. 

 

Also, Michelins aren't exactly a supple ride. I have Michlein LTX MS2 on my truck and they are honestly pretty bad. They look sharp and grip decently, but they are all out of round and don't seem to balance worth a crap. I've done lots and lots burnouts and they are finally somewhat smooth on the highway. Same problem with my wifes SUV. I bought Michelin Premier and had to go through 10 tires in total just to get all four under 15 lbs of road force and even then they still vibrated on the highway. Swapped them for a set of Falkens and the first set all were under 10 lbs of road force and it's back to being smooth as glass. Saved $350 too. Do they Falkens have the same road feel? Nope. Are they as whisper quiet? Nope. But they are smoother on rough roads and don't vibrate. I'm pretty disappointed with Michelin here lately. 

Edited by lucas287
Posted
42 minutes ago, lucas287 said:

Hey man. Nope, never actually did any of this.

So never removed the middle leaf? 

Posted
49 minutes ago, lucas287 said:

Hey man. Nope, never actually did any of this. Found a great deal on a set of Koni shocks and bought them for all four corners. They ride very nicely! Especially the rears comparing them to the Bilsteins I had back there. NIGHT AND DAY softer than the Bilsteins. I've had several road trips with good weight in the bed too and the Koni's never seems stressed. Great shocks. 

 

The fronts, though, they didn't quite transform the front suspension to be super compliant. I think that's the springs. I can attest that the damn front springs are super stiff when swapping them over the Koni's. 

 

I ended up removing my front sway bar to see how the ride would be with more travel and less spring rate (a sway bar effectively increases spring rate and limits travel BTW) and the results were subtle but very nice. One could hardly call it harsh in nearly any scenario. But the downside is that there is increased roll and certain undulations on the freeway mean you have to pay more attention. Based on this experiment I would say that softer springs would help and also a setup that has more travel would help too. It's expensive, but I would probably entertain a coilover conversion just to get more travel which means you can use a lower spring rate right off the bat. 

 

Also, Michelins aren't exactly a supple ride. I have Michlein LTX MS2 on my truck and they are honestly pretty bad. They look sharp and grip decently, but they are all out of round and don't seem to balance worth a crap. I've done lots and lots burnouts and they are finally somewhat smooth on the highway. Same problem with my wifes SUV. I bought Michelin Premier and had to go through 10 tires in total just to get all four under 15 lbs of road force and even then they still vibrated on the highway. Swapped them for a set of Falkens and the first set all were under 10 lbs of road force and it's back to being smooth as glass. Saved $350 too. Do they Falkens have the same road feel? Nope. Are they as whisper quiet? Nope. But they are smoother on rough roads and don't vibrate. I'm pretty disappointed with Michelin here lately. 

Thanks for the detailed response. If we could find the right spring that comes on the Suburban 2wd or Tahoe 4wd that would be a cheap option...my brother had one too, but sold it a few months ago.  Would have been easy to find out.   

 

I'm disappointed to hear about the Michelins, I've always heard the opposite but not used them myself.  Can you tell me what size yours were? LT load range?  My biggest draw I was told they were super smooth.  I don't off-road my truck and don't want aggressive tires anymore. I need road tires that work well in MN winters.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I get the same results with pictures. Then I figure it out. Then I forget. Screw it.
    • I guess I'm the only one on this forum who can't get effing pics to load here! Do you have to resize them to post, or am I just blocked from uploads?   I have the same luck with automotive electronics ... but this is the ONLY site on the net that I have this problem!   I'd post pics of what I'm working on ... but I CAN'T! 🤬       Just fabbed up the kickdown cable (had to extend the cable mount WAAAY out from the throttle shaft to get a full pull), and parts arrived for the fuel lines on the 940 carb conversion project. Should be able to drive this thing by the end of the day. If not for work, I'd have had this thing done SIX weeks ago.   Got the jetting sorted out last week. Had a real bad tip-in bog that I couldn't seem to correct. Friggin float height was over 11mm too HIGH! eBay purchase, so no wonder everything is screwed up right out of the box! I ended up with a larger dual-squirt accelerator pump jet anyway instead of the single. Also moved the 70 primary idle jet (4 sizes too big out of the box) to the secondary idle circuit, and installed a 57 in the primary. Runs great on the fuel bottle!    Still using the computer for ignition. Going to drive it first and see if I want to go through the project of installing an intermediate shaft with a distributor drive gear, so I can install a block-mounted distributor and run points, 100% computer free. I should do that anyway just from a simplicity / reliability / tunability standpoint. The electronics left me stranded last year a couple times! I can't tweak the timing to my liking right now because of the computer. Tried twisting the cam-driven distributor already ... and the damned thing just reverts back to where it was! That's infuriating. But if it runs well enough I might save that for next season.   Just driving it in and out of the shop to work on other projects, it feels 1,000% more responsive with the carburetor. Also fires MUCH faster when cranking. Can't wait to drive it and see if I got more than 114 ponies, lolol.
    • Triumph makes me think of cars not bikes. Especially with model names like the TR7, that was a Triumph car model too. Peak TR for me was the TR250. You could retain the post-war roadster looks, with an optional surrey hard top, but with an inline 6 engine instead of the TR4's anemic 4-cylinder, but still have a 4 speed, optional overdrive.   I know almost nothing about Triumph bikes, except that they exist. Good looking bikes though.   I don't know if I could just have one vehicle. The Silverado does it all except for fitting anywhere. But it leaves a void in real driving enjoyment, unless driving an extremely large sofa is your thing.   What did I do to my 'other' (muslce car - which one!?) vehicle lately. I took my '23 SS for a drive. It's only got 1600 miles. I keep reminding myself I shouldn't be so precious about this car. It likes to be driven. Needs to be driven. Life is short and if I don't enjoy it, someone else will. The other half calls it "the garage ornament".
    • Hey everyone, Thought we’d share our 40" SLIM Light Bar setup for the 2022+ Chevrolet Silverado 1500 for anyone looking at behind-the-grille lighting options.   The 40" bar sits behind the lower factory grille, so it stays pretty well hidden when it’s off. The mounting position is also adjustable, which helps with getting the bar positioned properly depending on the grille.   A few details on the setup:   40" SLIM LED light bar Fits 2022–2026 Silverado 1500 Spot + flood beam pattern White, amber, or white with amber DRL backglow Adjustable mounting position No cutting or drilling required Doesn't interfere with the active grille shutters Vehicle-specific mounting brackets       It’s a straightforward option for anyone who wants the coverage of a 40" bar but prefers to keep the front of the truck relatively stock-looking. Curious what the Silverado owners here prefer — hidden behind-the-grille lighting or an exposed bumper-mounted setup?  
    • Yes. Absolutely. That doesn't mean I don't like and enjoy a variety of machines. I went for a time with no other vehicle than a 1976 Triumph TR7-V Tiger. Loved that bike and rode it 365 in any and all weather. I did not feel deprived of anything.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...