Jump to content

4ply or 10ply A/T ridge grapplers?

Bill109

By Bill109
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

Bill109 Enthusiast

Bill109

Posted
Posted

Hey guys,

calling around to get some new all terrains on my 2015 1500

looking at the 275/60/20 ridge grapplers. I wasn’t aware Untill I just called.. they offer a 4ply for $220/tire mounted balanced or 10ply for $270/tire mounted and balanced. 

The money difference isn’t an issue I just wonder if it’s worth the extra to get the thicker sidewall? It’s more puncture resistant, However is there a sidewall tread pattern difference since it’s  got a thicker wall? 

Will it ride like complete crap with the 10 ply?

thoughts...?!

thanks!! 

dcarl Enthusiast

dcarl

Posted
Posted

I’ve punctured 10 ply tires just as much as the other.... in that size, you would be more comfortable with the 4 ply.  

 

I run LT285/60R20 and to get a decent ride I run them at 38 psi cold.  Really should be running 42 psi based on the conversion table from Toyo Tires but it definitely has an impact on ride quality.  As you go bigger, the p-metric options are hard to find. Nitto Terra Graplers G2 come in a 305/55R20 "XL" version which is lighter.

michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
Posted

I've gone the route if 10 ply tires on a half ton a few times and always missed the ride of the p metrics. I have 8 ply Duratracs on now and although it rides just ok I'm already looking forward to the next set being p metrics. 

I searched these Duratracs out because they were only 8 ply and the lightest aggressive tires in my size of 285/70/17's. 

You don't have nearly the sidewall I do. I sure wouldn't consider 10 ply. 

damnthetorpedoes Enthusiast

damnthetorpedoes

Posted
Posted

I have had 10 ply in the past. Unless you are using all of the load capacity of your truck on a regular basis I would go with the p metrics. The ride will be much better. 

Mountain boy Enthusiast

Mountain boy

Posted
Posted

Gas mileage is less on the 10 plys too because of the increased unsprung weight, figure about 10 lbs per tire. I have had this same debate going with the 4 ply.

TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted

295/60/20 here

5cb26e5026e8f4d1ea3026316845b3fa.jpg

Definitely a huge difference in ride quality from stock. Nitto Ridge Grapplers are heavier and definitely affect your acceleration and braking as well as negatively affect your mpg’s.

They’re very durable, ride smooth as long as you’re on a smooth surface. I’ve got coil overs which help but if I could find a lighter Ridge Grappler I’d jump on it but until then, I’m running these. I’d look at Toyo Open Country AT2’s but have heard they’re coming out with a new version soon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, Bill109 said:

Hey guys,

calling around to get some new all terrains on my 2015 1500

looking at the 275/60/20 ridge grapplers. I wasn’t aware Untill I just called.. they offer a 4ply for $220/tire mounted balanced or 10ply for $270/tire mounted and balanced. 

The money difference isn’t an issue I just wonder if it’s worth the extra to get the thicker sidewall? It’s more puncture resistant, However is there a sidewall tread pattern difference since it’s  got a thicker wall? 

Will it ride like complete crap with the 10 ply?

thoughts...?!

thanks!! 

You do not need 10ply tires on your 1500.  They will cost you more at the time of purchase and at the pump for the life of the tire.  Like others, I had to try it myself to learn my lesson.  You may also want to review your reasons for buying all terrain tires. Buying them for their looks is a good reason but know that they typically wear faster and do not improve traction on normal roads.  I typically use Michelin all season highway tires on my truck and never shy away from snow covered or gravel roads.  I also enjoy a quiet, smooth ride and achieve factory tire mpg's.  

Bill109 Enthusiast

Bill109

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you guys for the input. A lot of great info here. 

Im glad I’ve asked, I have done some searching and everyone has mixed opinions on the 10.  I’m going to keep looking into this however the previous comments here regarding weight, along with performance loss is of concern. The truck has the 6.2 which is more power than I need. I use the truck to take the boat to the lake all summer, and occasionally move things around with a car hauler. 

Does a stiffer sidewall compromise traction? 

 

My main concern was the weight of the truck on the 4 ply. Im concerned it will constantly look like it’s got low/flat tires. I also think a 10ply will wear more evenly since it’s got the added sidewall strength. 

TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted
You do not need 10ply tires on your 1500.  They will cost you more at the time of purchase and at the pump for the life of the tire.  Like others, I had to try it myself to learn my lesson.  You may also want to review your reasons for buying all terrain tires. Buying them for their looks is a good reason but know that they typically wear faster and do not improve traction on normal roads.  I typically use Michelin all season highway tires on my truck and never shy away from snow covered or gravel roads.  I also enjoy a quiet, smooth ride and achieve factory tire mpg's.  


I’ve owned a lot of trucks and SUV’s, Michelin Defenders and AT2’s are literally identical when it comes to traction in any off-road condition, not at all good for lose soil and especially not good at all in wet grass. You can get much better traction with half-way worn AT tires in those conditions. My experience while driving in snow with both we not at all good, lots of slipping and sliding but the one thing I did appreciate about the Michelin tires was their comfort, smooth on the road and slightly better mpg’s but there are far better tires with better traction with about the same ride comfort. Defenders were great on towing, much better on wear and mpg’s.
I’m currently running Nitto Ridge Grapplers, which have completely out performed Michelin’s in everything except mpg’s which I’m perfectly fine with especially because I was getting nails and screws in my LT Michelin’s ever few months and nothing in a year with my Nitto Ridge Grapplers. I probably jinxed myself now lol.
Today’s tire technology, you’ll get much more then what was offered 5-10 years ago.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

I’ve owned a lot of trucks and SUV’s, Michelin Defenders and AT2’s are literally identical when it comes to traction in any off-road condition, not at all good for lose soil and especially not good at all in wet grass. You can get much better traction with half-way worn AT tires in those conditions. My experience while driving in snow with both we not at all good, lots of slipping and sliding but the one thing I did appreciate about the Michelin tires was their comfort, smooth on the road and slightly better mpg’s but there are far better tires with better traction with about the same ride comfort. Defenders were great on towing, much better on wear and mpg’s.

I’m currently running Nitto Ridge Grapplers, which have completely out performed Michelin’s in everything except mpg’s which I’m perfectly fine with especially because I was getting nails and screws in my LT Michelin’s ever few months and nothing in a year with my Nitto Ridge Grapplers. I probably jinxed myself now lol.
Today’s tire technology, you’ll get much more then what was offered 5-10 years ago.

 

Good information.  The trouble with tires is that they are costly which makes it difficult to experiment!  It is great to hear the real world experiences of others.  I tend to find a product that has served me well and not deviate!  When tire buying time rolls (pun intended) around I usually do a decent amount of "shopping".  For the past 20 years, I have found the convenience, quality cost, and support of the Costco/Michelin experience to be unbeatable.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...