Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, amxguy1970 said:

 

Measured level btw doesn't look it, the nose looks high when you sit level at the fenders fyi. 

 This is a true statement on the 2014-18's, can't say for the 19's. Most people measure the wheel well openings, which may cause that look, as they may not be cut the same.  I measured the rocker panel and leveled it.  I ended up with 1/2" rake out of the factory 1 3/4 stock rake. I can live with that  

Posted
On 8/27/2019 at 2:06 PM, Wakezilla said:

For what it's worth, I put a 6" procomp lift on my 6.2 LTZ and I couldn't be happier. 

Screen Shot 2019-08-27 at 2.12.29 PM.png

What wheels are those? I am having a hard time figuring out which wheels fit on our trucks.

Posted
8 minutes ago, bullet3z said:

What wheels are those? I am having a hard time figuring out which wheels fit on our trucks.

Fuel Vapor 20x10 

Posted
On 8/27/2019 at 11:06 AM, Wakezilla said:

For what it's worth, I put a 6" procomp lift on my 6.2 LTZ and I couldn't be happier. 

Screen Shot 2019-08-27 at 2.12.29 PM.png

Wow that new to me that they have a 6.2l in a 2019 ltz

Posted
8 minutes ago, Darcy said:

Wow that new to me that they have a 6.2l in a 2019 ltz

And it's a big difference over the 5.3 too

Posted

Well I run a GMC and Chevy dealer and for 2019 Chevy all you can get the 6.2l is in a high country and gmc is Denali and the At4 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Darcy said:

Wow that new to me that they have a 6.2l in a 2019 ltz

 

27 minutes ago, Darcy said:

Well I run a GMC and Chevy dealer and for 2019 Chevy all you can get the 6.2l is in a high country and gmc is Denali and the At4 

 

26 minutes ago, Darcy said:

So please don't bullshit on here

 

Screenshot_20190829-151002_Chrome.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 8/29/2019 at 10:43 PM, Darcy said:

Well I run a GMC and Chevy dealer and for 2019 Chevy all you can get the 6.2l is in a high country and gmc is Denali and the At4 

If what you say is actually true, you're an idiot and do not know the product you sell. My garage contains a 2019 LTZ with a 6.2. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 8/29/2019 at 4:43 PM, Darcy said:

So please don't bullshit on here

 

My GM dealership in Ontario, Canada has 6.2 LTZ's (and yes we say zed).

 

 

image.thumb.png.4cdd6dbb89bd1a421ee205697e308df4.png

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 8/30/2019 at 7:26 PM, cltsig said:

If what you say is actually true, you're an idiot and do not know the product you sell. My garage contains a 2019 LTZ with a 6.2. 

Yep.  This guy,,,lol.  I have a 2019 LTZ with the 6.2l. Zoom in on Hood -- love it!

Screenshot_20190905-215907_Photos.jpg

Edited by Wakezilla
  • Like 1
Posted

So a guy was bullshitting about running a dealer saying another guy was bullshitting about his truck. Man, get me some boots!! Btw, I run a service dept for a gmc dealer and knew the 6.2 came in ltz. Not sure what Darcy has been selling but it’s not trucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...