Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, BadStickMan said:

Here how bad the tires were on mine from the road force balance test they all failed. It rides like a completely different truck after replacing them.

F3C6639B-9049-4BFC-9CE2-91098314591A.jpeg

Technically only right front is out of spec.  45lbs at 60 psi, 50 lbs at 70 psi.  Glad to see them replacing tires at lower specs to help fix these trucks.

Edited by MTU Alum
Posted
20 hours ago, MTU Alum said:

Road force balance will not determine a pull issue with a tire.  Dealers are supposed to swap the tires from side to side to determine if there is a tire issue with belt angle.  

 

#iworkforGM 

 

They did swap the tires side to side and said it was all fixed, but it just changed the way the truck pulled from right to left. I will mention it again when I get my oil changed.

 

I guess I'm thankful that I don't have any shakes or vibration with the LT steering system.

Posted
10 hours ago, SkidooSteve12 said:

 

They did swap the tires side to side and said it was all fixed, but it just changed the way the truck pulled from right to left. I will mention it again when I get my oil changed.

 

I guess I'm thankful that I don't have any shakes or vibration with the LT steering system.

If the pull direction swapped you may need a new front tire to repair.

  • Like 1
Posted

Truck back from the 4th visit at the dealer to correct the shimmy issues I'm having.  Long story short, GM has notified the dealer that this is a "normal operating condition" and it will not pay for further warranty work on this problem.  You read that right - GM is now saying that steering wheel shimmy is a feature, and not a defect.

It must be a widespread problem, as I drove 4 brand new trucks on the lot, and all of them had the same issue, one was better, the other three were worse.

What this really means is GM has no fix for the problem and they are trying to wash their hands of it.  In all fairness the customer relations person I have been working with has been great at coordinating the dealer, field engineers and TAC to find a resolution. In the end though, TAC has indicated there is nothing else that can be done.

I recommend that everyone that has this problem call GM at 800-462-8782 and ask for the case to immediately be escalated to the Executive Customer Relations team.  Don't take no for an answer.  Also, since this problem seems not to matter to GM, report the issue to https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/VehicleComplaint/ as a safety concern.

I can't express how disappointed I am with GMs response to this.

 

Posted

You might want to inform them that, after 3 tries to correct the same problem, it can start to proceed to the lemon law BS.

What a total load of shit, brand new truck, if the wheels and tires aren't the problem, then what is Mr GM????

Posted (edited)

Verbatim from GM:  "The condition is considered normal, so there would be no cause for a buyback."

 

In other words, GM doesn't consider this a defect, so there really isn't a problem.  Again, GM washing their hands...

Edited by Bluedog
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

GM Customer Care called this morning, and long story short, GM has no known repair for the steering wheel "oscillation" that seems to affect a significant number of trucks. They also reiterated that it is "normal" for the steering wheel to shake, so there is no defect to claim a buyback.

What that means is if you have had the TSB completed that is referenced in this thread, and you still have this problem, you're simply out of luck as far as GM cares. The rep even stated that GM engineering nor TAC are even working on a fix at this time.

Great. An $80K truck with a shaking steering wheel as an engineered "feature."

Posted
2 hours ago, Bluedog said:

GM Customer Care called this morning, and long story short, GM has no known repair for the steering wheel "oscillation" that seems to affect a significant number of trucks. They also reiterated that it is "normal" for the steering wheel to shake, so there is no defect to claim a buyback.

What that means is if you have had the TSB completed that is referenced in this thread, and you still have this problem, you're simply out of luck as far as GM cares. The rep even stated that GM engineering nor TAC are even working on a fix at this time.

Great. An $80K truck with a shaking steering wheel as an engineered "feature."

I replaced all 4 tires at my expense with new cooper xlt and it magically disappeared. Smooth as butter now. Sold the take offs to tire shop for $400. May want to go this route. Also check all 4 corners ground to fender. These trucks are not level in any way side to side.

Posted

I have Michelin on my and no issue  at all, up to 80mph has been smooth with no issues.

  • Like 1
Posted

I too have been dealing with the vibration issue and pulling to the left on my 2020 3500. Got it 4 weeks ago and have put 4400 miles on it, all the while saying that my steering feels loose in addition to the vibration at highway speeds. Going into dealership today for the third time to get two tires replaced as two were off in the road force balance. Also called them in advance to notify them of the service bulletin. Fingers crossed this solves it. 

Posted

I knew my truck would have this shake the moment I saw Goodyear tires on it. I've had this fight with my Ford cars is the past few years. I'll be buying Michelin when I wear these out.



Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

Posted

I had the TSB done a few weeks ago and it fixed it 100%, still on stock tires and no steering wheel shake.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/14/2019 at 8:27 PM, MTU Alum said:

Is the vibration in the steering wheel, seat/floor, or both?

 

#iworkforGM 

Hi MTU Alum, since you work for GM I'd like to ask if you know about a problem I am having with my 2020 Siera Denali 3500HD Diesel hat seems transmission related.  The first time I went over 70 MPH (after 500 mile break in), I noticed a loud vibration noise.  I have learned I can reproduce this issue by finding a gear that will put the truck at 1600 RPM. This includes driving at 73-75 MPH in 10th gear, 68 MPH in 9th Gear, and around 54 MPH in 8th.  The more I drive it the more I hear it when shifting through lower gears as the tach reaches 1600 RPM.  The noise is like a load howling/cowling noise.  Passengers report feeling a vibration coming out of the floor.  It's been at the dealer over a week and a half.  They had a GM engineer that worked on it for 4.5 hours.  He said it wasn't transmission and spent the majority of his time around the intake from what I understand.  He had monitors and sensors all over the place and at one point thought he had it fixed.  Then when road testing the noise came back.  Now I am being asked to talk with a GM district manager.  I am also told the dealer found another truck making the same noise.  I know they are going to say this is normal.  But when I started this process with the dealer, I drove a truck that is 30 VIN numbers less than mine from their lot and it did not have this issue.  Rides beautifully.  There was one point in time where I was promised that I would receive a new transmission until the GM  showed up.  They also tried a bolt fix under Bulletin #19-NA-216 with no help.  Any insights that you have into this would be much appreciated.

Edited by Sonny James
spelling
Posted

I'm aware on any issues at 1600 rpm.  The dealer should hookup a picoscope and it determines the frequency and order of the vibration.  This will point the techs and engineers where to start with their root cause work.   Without having that info, it's hard to determine what it could be.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,856 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...