Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I actually got them from my local tire shop.  Factory sensors so easy to set the TPMS.

  • 9 months later...
Posted

I know this is an older thread but I stumbled across it when I was seeing how big of tires I could go so I’ll share my recent experience. Just purchased a 2020 2500hd Denali  The first thing I did was level it at home with the stock keys. I had a 2018 2500hd prior to this one. When I bought the 2018 new and leveled it with stock keys I was very close to hitting upper control arm stops to get it level.  Also used almost all of the adjusting bolt on the torsion keys. On the 2020 I have PLENTY of clearance until the UCA stops(3/4”) and plenty of adjusting bolt left after lifting almost 2” to level. I can honestly say on this one I see no need for aftermarket keys or UCA. I installed 295 65r20 toyo open country tires on the 2020 and have good clearance on front and rear. No rubbing when cranking front tires forward or reverse. Happy with the look and the ride feels very similar to stock. My 2018 rode terrible with the front end leveled. The new 2020 is no comparison in ride quality when leveled. Hope this helps for anyone else looking to go with larger tires 

Posted
5 hours ago, SummitX said:

I know this is an older thread but I stumbled across it when I was seeing how big of tires I could go so I’ll share my recent experience. Just purchased a 2020 2500hd Denali  The first thing I did was level it at home with the stock keys. I had a 2018 2500hd prior to this one. When I bought the 2018 new and leveled it with stock keys I was very close to hitting upper control arm stops to get it level.  Also used almost all of the adjusting bolt on the torsion keys. On the 2020 I have PLENTY of clearance until the UCA stops(3/4”) and plenty of adjusting bolt left after lifting almost 2” to level. I can honestly say on this one I see no need for aftermarket keys or UCA. I installed 295 65r20 toyo open country tires on the 2020 and have good clearance on front and rear. No rubbing when cranking front tires forward or reverse. Happy with the look and the ride feels very similar to stock. My 2018 rode terrible with the front end leveled. The new 2020 is no comparison in ride quality when leveled. Hope this helps for anyone else looking to go with larger tires 

If I were to crank mine up 2", I'd be higher than the rear.  Not as much rake on the 20's.  295/65/20 should clear with no cranking of the bars with stock rims.

Posted

Realize I'm a little late to this, but I've been running 296/65/20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers since last November (2019).

 

I have Fuel 20x9 +20 offset wheels.  Only minor rubbing on the front of the fender liners, which were easy enough to pin back with some zip ties which aren't noticeable.

 

My suspension is stock with exception of the shocks, but they have no bearing on the height.

 

FaCvt9f.jpg

 

rJGklx4.jpg

 

ZEB2aNi.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 9/10/2020 at 9:53 AM, cdh7917 said:

Realize I'm a little late to this, but I've been running 296/65/20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers since last November (2019).

 

I have Fuel 20x9 +20 offset wheels.  Only minor rubbing on the front of the fender liners, which were easy enough to pin back with some zip ties which aren't noticeable.

 

My suspension is stock with exception of the shocks, but they have no bearing on the height.

 

FaCvt9f.jpg

 

rJGklx4.jpg

 

ZEB2aNi.jpg

When you say minor, how minor? You think if you had the stock wheels, from what I read have +44 offset, would they fit no rub?

Posted
26 minutes ago, Londart2020 said:

When you say minor, how minor? You think if you had the stock wheels, from what I read have +44 offset, would they fit no rub?

I can’t say cause I didn’t even try, but just from looking at things as they are now, I think on stock wheels you’d likely be ok. Not sure if the extra width of the tire would make contact on the UCA, but it’s only a 20mm wider tire than stock and the 20mm is split between each side of the rim, so it’s only 10mm wider in each side. 
 

The rubbing was very minor that I initially had. Certainly nothing to get too concerned with. 
 

To fix it, I cut two 1/4” vertical slots at the very bottom of the front of the liner (just above the 90° lip at the bottom of the liner) with about 1-1.5” of space between the slits. From the back side, thread in a black zip tie towards the wheel in one slit, then thread it through the other slit back towards the front bumper. 
 

There is a round bar that is a lower bumper support and it sits just in front of the liner.  I looped the tie around it and tightened it until I was clear; it didn’t need much. 
 

It just barely pulls the liner away from the wheel and toward the front bumper, and only at the very bottom. When done with a black zip tie, it isn’t even noticeable and is hard to spot even if you’re looking for it. 
 

The liners are very durable, so I have no concern about the tie tearing through or ripping the slits longer. I’m coming up on almost a year with it done, and I’d do it again. I really didn’t want to turn my keys or mess with the suspension at all. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, cdh7917 said:

I can’t say cause I didn’t even try, but just from looking at things as they are now, I think on stock wheels you’d likely be ok. Not sure if the extra width of the tire would make contact on the UCA, but it’s only a 20mm wider tire than stock and the 20mm is split between each side of the rim, so it’s only 10mm wider in each side. 
 

The rubbing was very minor that I initially had. Certainly nothing to get too concerned with. 
 

To fix it, I cut two 1/4” vertical slots at the very bottom of the front of the liner (just above the 90° lip at the bottom of the liner) with about 1-1.5” of space between the slits. From the back side, thread in a black zip tie towards the wheel in one slit, then thread it through the other slit back towards the front bumper. 
 

 

There is a round bar that is a lower bumper support and it sits just in front of the liner.  I looped the tie around it and tightened it until I was clear; it didn’t need much. 
 

It just barely pulls the liner away from the wheel and toward the front bumper, and only at the very bottom. When done with a black zip tie, it isn’t even noticeable and is hard to spot even if you’re looking for it. 
 

The liners are very durable, so I have no concern about the tie tearing through or ripping the slits longer. I’m coming up on almost a year with it done, and I’d do it again. I really didn’t want to turn my keys or mess with the suspension at all. 

If you had to turn the keys to clear.... how much do think you would have to crank up to clear?

Edited by Doubleu
Posted (edited)
On 11/14/2019 at 4:31 PM, CRApex said:

I got the XD’s on today.  Leaving everything stock the 295/65/20 rubbed more than I like.  Went with 285/65/20 G2’s and they barely JUST touch at full lock in reverse.  Wheels are 20x9 +18

 

6F1986AC-24DF-42E6-9459-86B5FB7E39F7.jpeg

CRApex- do you think the 295’s would fit with a leveling kit on a 20 x 9 with a positive offset?

Edited by JB23
Posted
On 9/10/2020 at 9:53 AM, cdh7917 said:

Realize I'm a little late to this, but I've been running 296/65/20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers since last November (2019).

 

I have Fuel 20x9 +20 offset wheels.  Only minor rubbing on the front of the fender liners, which were easy enough to pin back with some zip ties which aren't noticeable.

 

My suspension is stock with exception of the shocks, but they have no bearing on the height.

 

FaCvt9f.jpg

 

rJGklx4.jpg

 

ZEB2aNi.jpg

cdh7917- do you think your set-up wouldn’t rub if you had a leveling kit and new UCA’s???

Posted
17 minutes ago, JB23 said:

CRApex- do you think the 295’s would fit with a leveling kit on a 20 x 9 with a positive offset?

You might be able to tie the liner back and make it work, I didn't try that though.  The issue I see with raising the front on the new trucks is you can't go as far before the front is higher than the rear.  I'd have them test fit with your wheels and see if the liner can be tied back.

Posted

I wouldn’t be surprised if stock wheels and a couple turns on the keys gave you enough clearance to have no rub.

 

Like CRApex said, the problem with the new 2020+ trucks is that since there is less rake than 2019 and older, it’s easy to put the front end higher than the rear with too much adjustment.

Posted
42 minutes ago, cdh7917 said:

I wouldn’t be surprised if stock wheels and a couple turns on the keys gave you enough clearance to have no rub.

 

Like CRApex said, the problem with the new 2020+ trucks is that since there is less rake than 2019 and older, it’s easy to put the front end higher than the rear with too much adjustment.

The good part is, is that the shop that installed my McGaughy’s kit did a great job of making the sure the front wasn’t higher than the rear (thank god)... 

 

here it is after the kit
 

 

 

A2E76BBF-B90E-41D0-87E8-3D0563229DCA.jpeg

Posted
58 minutes ago, CRApex said:

You might be able to tie the liner back and make it work, I didn't try that though.  The issue I see with raising the front on the new trucks is you can't go as far before the front is higher than the rear.  I'd have them test fit with your wheels and see if the liner can be tied back.

 

The kit was put on already, but they did a good of of making sure it was level...

B1FB287C-1879-48EE-827B-BDDBEC272FA0.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...