Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Update:

 

Everything has been great since the Delete, no issues.

 

I still check everything every once in a while, no problems have manifested themselves, Truck is running great

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

First of all, thank you for the R&D with the vacuum pump delete and for going through with your plan and documenting it for the rest of us. Greatly appreciated!

 

now, some questions regarding crankcase evacuation system :

 

1.a) do check engine codes come up?

1.b) Can you delete/tune those codes out permanently?

 

2) Does your tail pipe get black and smokey after a while? Better than that fouled air being fed back into the engine though I suppose

 

3) Did you drill and weld in at two points for both vents or "T" in to one line?

4) Are check valves necessary to prevent backdraft??

 

5) Could frigid canadian winters have negative effects on evac system? Such as, condensation freezing in line/check valve and pluging it shut, thus causing a pressure build up...

 

Maybe this isn't the right thread for these questions but haven't found concrete answers and begining to bang head on the wall with catch can vs evac debate ... any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Posted
On 3/24/2021 at 12:20 PM, CANUCK88 said:

First of all, thank you for the R&D with the vacuum pump delete and for going through with your plan and documenting it for the rest of us. Greatly appreciated!

 

now, some questions regarding crankcase evacuation system :

 

1.a) do check engine codes come up?

1.b) Can you delete/tune those codes out permanently?

 

2) Does your tail pipe get black and smokey after a while? Better than that fouled air being fed back into the engine though I suppose

 

3) Did you drill and weld in at two points for both vents or "T" in to one line?

4) Are check valves necessary to prevent backdraft??

 

5) Could frigid canadian winters have negative effects on evac system? Such as, condensation freezing in line/check valve and pluging it shut, thus causing a pressure build up...

 

Maybe this isn't the right thread for these questions but haven't found concrete answers and begining to bang head on the wall with catch can vs evac debate ... any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Answered on the other Topic you commented on, but i see the points here are different; Happy to be of help!

 

1.- No check engine Lights, the engine does not have any PCV related sensors. Just put the Crankcase evac AFTER the exhaust O2 sensors LOL

 

2.- TailPipe doesnt get dirtier than normal

 

3.- Just 1 point in the exhaust, getting fed by one of the valve covers. I want to make a Y or T to feed it with bolth valve covers but just for symmetry.

 

4.- No, since no exhaust  backdrafts (I thoroughly checked)

 

5.- I dont think so, there is not enough water in the line to cause problems, and if there is, the moment you fire up the truck, heat would take care of any of that and blow it out the exhaust.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This seems way too simple. My brake booster is acting funny, already had some kind of a recall done on it where the dealer increased pressures. Lately though, especially in low speed traffic, I'm getting the abs activated even though the wheels are not locking up. Thus, pointing me to a soon to fail brake booster. 

 

So basically the steps are: disable 4 cyl mode, cut belt, remove booster, fill holes with plugs and re-route some piping as stated in post 1?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Did something similar, but I teed into the pcv line to keep that function. Kept  the vacuum pump and used two check valves so the stronger source runs the brakes. Run in M5 to stay in v8 mode. No more scary  parking lot.

Edited by Little Yimmy
Updated repair and wanted to keep the post accurate.
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Very cool and it seems straight forward. Is there any reason you can't remove the vacuum pump belt and just leave the pump on? As long as the pump isn't turning, it wont grenade itself, right?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a 2018 5.3 Silverado,truck is not included in the recall, I replaced the vacuum pump, line and grommet.  Still having brake issues, Yesterday I did the bypass from the intake manifold to the booster(I have a plug to disable AFM), I followed the video exactly, test drive did not go well, still have issues, any ideas on what to do next?

Posted
On 7/28/2022 at 9:10 AM, taylormjones3 said:

Very cool and it seems straight forward. Is there any reason you can't remove the vacuum pump belt and just leave the pump on? As long as the pump isn't turning, it wont grenade itself, right?

 

I don't see why that couldn't work, i have read of people doing it 

 

 

3 hours ago, David Saville said:

I have a 2018 5.3 Silverado,truck is not included in the recall, I replaced the vacuum pump, line and grommet.  Still having brake issues, Yesterday I did the bypass from the intake manifold to the booster(I have a plug to disable AFM), I followed the video exactly, test drive did not go well, still have issues, any ideas on what to do next?

 

What exactly is the problem? Does the pedal just feel stiff and hard ?

 

Now that your vacuum is being pulled by the engine, you could troubleshoot with carb cleaner for leaks. I would thoroughly check also brake lines and pads/rotors just for peace of mind

 

I also found this video on how to test for a bad Brake Booster, if carb cleaner doesnt uncover vacuum leaks

 

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, VdellaV said:

 

I don't see why that couldn't work, i have read of people doing it 

 

 

 

What exactly is the problem? Does the pedal just feel stiff and hard ?

 

Now that your vacuum is being pulled by the engine, you could troubleshoot with carb cleaner for leaks. I would thoroughly check also brake lines and pads/rotors just for peace of mind

 

I also found this video on how to test for a bad Brake Booster, if carb cleaner doesnt uncover vacuum leaks

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, David Saville said:

 

The brake pedal gets hard at low RPM, especially stopped at traffic lights and driving in parking lots, very bad when backing the boat down the ramp.  I did allthe tests in the above video for the booster and it all passed.  I do on occasion get the brake pedal to the floor and it feels like the brakes are grinding but I can't hear them, then when I rev up or accelerate, the brakes work fine.  I get the brake assist light when I get the hard pedal and the floored pedal.

Posted
1 minute ago, David Saville said:

The brake pedal gets hard at low RPM, especially stopped at traffic lights and driving in parking lots, very bad when backing the boat down the ramp.  I did allthe tests in the above video for the booster and it all passed.  I do on occasion get the brake pedal to the floor and it feels like the brakes are grinding but I can't hear them, then when I rev up or accelerate, the brakes work fine.  I get the brake assist light when I get the hard pedal and the floored pedal.

 

Did you connect the brake booster to the intake manifold with one uninterrupted line like i did in my video?

 

Also, that line cant be just any normal hose, it has to be harder so vacuum doesnt suck it closed.

 

If everything else is fine, the only thing left would be to change the Brake booster itself

Posted

Yes, I bought a 3/8 vacuum hose from Napa.  My friend connected his snap on tester to the truck, I was getting 12lbs of vacuum with the vacuum pump with slow recovery, I was only getting 10 lbs with the vacuum coming from the manifold, but recovery time was quick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,769 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...