Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So you have no valley cover breather? Do you have the lines from the valve covers to the intake tube? [emoji15]

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
15 minutes ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

So you have no valley cover breather? Do you have the lines from the valve covers to the intake tube? emoji15.png

The valve cover breathers send the vapors to the exhaust.

 

The Evacuation System uses the vacuum created in the exhaust tubes to suck the PCV vapors out of the crankcase, this is how it installs:

 

https://www.jegs.com/InstallationInstructions/500/555/555-52210.pdf

 

Actual Product: https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/52210/10002/-1

 

Posted
To do this getting rid of the vacuum pump do you also have to get rid of the oil catch can I have installed?
No you need a breather to the engine. And if in any way it goes to the intake then you want to clean it. The op has valve covers to the exhaust so there is no line to the intake at all so no can is needed. I am not so sure about blocking of the valley cover port. But to each his own. It is possible the exhaust is pulling enough the valley isn't a issue.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
34 minutes ago, brokesilverado said:

To do this getting rid of the vacuum pump do you also have to get rid of the oil catch can I have installed?

You would have to if it's a catch can routed into the little PCV line.

 

...Catch cans in the PCV line returning to the intake manifold DO NOT WORK. That is a subject all on its own. In a nutshell, Catch cans only catch oil when they're cold, because it acts like a distillery: Hot vapors condense inside it. Once they get to temperature, they let all vapors pass through. This is all meaningless anyway because the valve cover breathers are blowing the great majority of PCV vapors into the intake air box anyway.

 

I used to have a Catch Can, but it was atmospheric: I had deleted the PCV Line and routed the valve cover breathers out of the catch can. I got tired of the mess and installed the Crankcase Evacuation kit.

Posted
56 minutes ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

I am not so sure about blocking of the valley cover port. But to each his own. It is possible the exhaust is pulling enough the valley isn't a issue.

Most of the crankcase vapors flow out of the valve covers anyway, the valley cover breather only flows when there is vacuum on the manifold. apply enough throttle or Boost in the manifold and that line becomes useless, so why not go ahead and delete it whole?

 

Im pretty sure more than 90% of the crankcase vapors go out of the valve cover breathers anyway, and with a boosted engine the check valve inside the valley cover breather could break and go into the crankcase.

 

At least that is the logic behind my train of thought, applied to my specific engine, it could not apply on other engines/set ups

 

 

Posted

You are very correct. Us boosted vehicles have every line on valve covers and even the css going to breather tanks then my valley cover to can and to intake but the check valve closes under boost and the turbo pulls air on the 2nd port of can.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

i like to watch your posting for a year and see what issues crop up..

 

good point on the high temp vapor by-passing the catch can.. seems they need to go back and design in a condenser before the vapor can drop out into liquid from a gas.

 

I have installed an exhaust crank vent system (ecv) lol....on a truck once. pretty easy to install except for the welding of the bungs into the exhaust..

 

i wonder what grumpybear thinks of this ?hehe

Edited by flyingfool
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/10/2019 at 8:21 AM, VdellaV said:

You could remove the belt without cutting it and buy a new OEM Pump-Booster Hard Line, then reassemble the truck before trading it or so. PPKs idea is also a good one:

 

 

I have that PCV hose blow to the exhaust with a Crankcase Evacuation System

 

It uses a Venturi effect on the exhaust flow to vacuums the Vapors out of the engine:

vib-1189-1.jpg

this vid is for you 

 

 

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 1/6/2020 at 3:26 PM, JONBLARC7 said:

Everything still working fine with your Vacuum pump deleted????

Its been a few months, everything is going smooth and fine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,965
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DaleB
    Newest Member
    DaleB
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,427 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Common Sense Assembly   Your driveline is forgiving of the occasional mistake. It will even often forgive the random serious blunder. But it will not forgive a continuous bad habit.      What? Not everything needs to be a five thousand word essay.       
    • We drove about 15 minute east today to visit a friend and saw a steep increase in price in the same county. About 50 cents a gallon steepper. 
    • Sure about that? A degree wheel and a dial indicator would lower your degree of assurance in that statement. 😉    It why we have offset keys and dialable timing sprockets. Just say'n.... I've built a few and have never seen one "On the money". 
    • I will admit I haven't experimented much with pressure drops beyond the numbers I put in and part of that is that the numbers I used are fairly low and then found out it would trigger regardless at that 35 psi. Having said that I had tried before had changed the placard pressures and being that I have a 1 ton set to 80 on the placard for the rear I believe it triggered close to 60, the front I don't recall now for sure but thought maybe it could get close to 45 from that factory 60 placard pressure. So I never did figure out if it was a number of psi from placard pressure to the alarm or a percentage of the total placard number as some figured it was like a 25% drop from placard pressure would trigger it. So as to try and answer your question, I believe I set the placard pressure on the front to 47 or so and while I run the front tires at 40, they have dipped below that some if its colder and I haven't put "winter air" in yet and never once have had the front alarm go off. I would say that the answer your looking for is no, that if you set your placard pressure to 45, you have a certain amount of room to drop below that pressure before the alarm will go off.    The pressures you decide to run in your truck, that ends up being what makes sense to you based on what your carrying in your truck or if towing, then have to bump them back up to something that will carry the load in the rear and the fronts typically left at the same pressure. It all comes down to that chart I put the link to and using an accurate roadside scale to be your guide, both unloaded and then loaded to know your minimum safe pressures.    I just wish GM would allow a person to change the readings for the tire pressures to the English system of pounds as I have to look at that goofy metric reading that will never ever jive in my head and will go over and change it just to figure out what they are if need be and then change it back. 
    • That part I understand, that the dealer can do it. But I'm not understanding why updates that were available to the truck since it left the factory, or the dealership originally, would not still be available to it without dealer intervention.   I'm thinking along the lines of recalls. They stay available until they are completed, regardless of whether they are in warranty or not, or in the hands of the original owner or not. Why not updates as well, especially since some of those can be safety related also?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...