Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Update:

 

Everything has been great since the Delete, no issues.

 

I still check everything every once in a while, no problems have manifested themselves, Truck is running great

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

First of all, thank you for the R&D with the vacuum pump delete and for going through with your plan and documenting it for the rest of us. Greatly appreciated!

 

now, some questions regarding crankcase evacuation system :

 

1.a) do check engine codes come up?

1.b) Can you delete/tune those codes out permanently?

 

2) Does your tail pipe get black and smokey after a while? Better than that fouled air being fed back into the engine though I suppose

 

3) Did you drill and weld in at two points for both vents or "T" in to one line?

4) Are check valves necessary to prevent backdraft??

 

5) Could frigid canadian winters have negative effects on evac system? Such as, condensation freezing in line/check valve and pluging it shut, thus causing a pressure build up...

 

Maybe this isn't the right thread for these questions but haven't found concrete answers and begining to bang head on the wall with catch can vs evac debate ... any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Posted
On 3/24/2021 at 12:20 PM, CANUCK88 said:

First of all, thank you for the R&D with the vacuum pump delete and for going through with your plan and documenting it for the rest of us. Greatly appreciated!

 

now, some questions regarding crankcase evacuation system :

 

1.a) do check engine codes come up?

1.b) Can you delete/tune those codes out permanently?

 

2) Does your tail pipe get black and smokey after a while? Better than that fouled air being fed back into the engine though I suppose

 

3) Did you drill and weld in at two points for both vents or "T" in to one line?

4) Are check valves necessary to prevent backdraft??

 

5) Could frigid canadian winters have negative effects on evac system? Such as, condensation freezing in line/check valve and pluging it shut, thus causing a pressure build up...

 

Maybe this isn't the right thread for these questions but haven't found concrete answers and begining to bang head on the wall with catch can vs evac debate ... any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Answered on the other Topic you commented on, but i see the points here are different; Happy to be of help!

 

1.- No check engine Lights, the engine does not have any PCV related sensors. Just put the Crankcase evac AFTER the exhaust O2 sensors LOL

 

2.- TailPipe doesnt get dirtier than normal

 

3.- Just 1 point in the exhaust, getting fed by one of the valve covers. I want to make a Y or T to feed it with bolth valve covers but just for symmetry.

 

4.- No, since no exhaust  backdrafts (I thoroughly checked)

 

5.- I dont think so, there is not enough water in the line to cause problems, and if there is, the moment you fire up the truck, heat would take care of any of that and blow it out the exhaust.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This seems way too simple. My brake booster is acting funny, already had some kind of a recall done on it where the dealer increased pressures. Lately though, especially in low speed traffic, I'm getting the abs activated even though the wheels are not locking up. Thus, pointing me to a soon to fail brake booster. 

 

So basically the steps are: disable 4 cyl mode, cut belt, remove booster, fill holes with plugs and re-route some piping as stated in post 1?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Did something similar, but I teed into the pcv line to keep that function. Kept  the vacuum pump and used two check valves so the stronger source runs the brakes. Run in M5 to stay in v8 mode. No more scary  parking lot.

Edited by Little Yimmy
Updated repair and wanted to keep the post accurate.
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Very cool and it seems straight forward. Is there any reason you can't remove the vacuum pump belt and just leave the pump on? As long as the pump isn't turning, it wont grenade itself, right?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a 2018 5.3 Silverado,truck is not included in the recall, I replaced the vacuum pump, line and grommet.  Still having brake issues, Yesterday I did the bypass from the intake manifold to the booster(I have a plug to disable AFM), I followed the video exactly, test drive did not go well, still have issues, any ideas on what to do next?

Posted
On 7/28/2022 at 9:10 AM, taylormjones3 said:

Very cool and it seems straight forward. Is there any reason you can't remove the vacuum pump belt and just leave the pump on? As long as the pump isn't turning, it wont grenade itself, right?

 

I don't see why that couldn't work, i have read of people doing it 

 

 

3 hours ago, David Saville said:

I have a 2018 5.3 Silverado,truck is not included in the recall, I replaced the vacuum pump, line and grommet.  Still having brake issues, Yesterday I did the bypass from the intake manifold to the booster(I have a plug to disable AFM), I followed the video exactly, test drive did not go well, still have issues, any ideas on what to do next?

 

What exactly is the problem? Does the pedal just feel stiff and hard ?

 

Now that your vacuum is being pulled by the engine, you could troubleshoot with carb cleaner for leaks. I would thoroughly check also brake lines and pads/rotors just for peace of mind

 

I also found this video on how to test for a bad Brake Booster, if carb cleaner doesnt uncover vacuum leaks

 

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, VdellaV said:

 

I don't see why that couldn't work, i have read of people doing it 

 

 

 

What exactly is the problem? Does the pedal just feel stiff and hard ?

 

Now that your vacuum is being pulled by the engine, you could troubleshoot with carb cleaner for leaks. I would thoroughly check also brake lines and pads/rotors just for peace of mind

 

I also found this video on how to test for a bad Brake Booster, if carb cleaner doesnt uncover vacuum leaks

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, David Saville said:

 

The brake pedal gets hard at low RPM, especially stopped at traffic lights and driving in parking lots, very bad when backing the boat down the ramp.  I did allthe tests in the above video for the booster and it all passed.  I do on occasion get the brake pedal to the floor and it feels like the brakes are grinding but I can't hear them, then when I rev up or accelerate, the brakes work fine.  I get the brake assist light when I get the hard pedal and the floored pedal.

Posted
1 minute ago, David Saville said:

The brake pedal gets hard at low RPM, especially stopped at traffic lights and driving in parking lots, very bad when backing the boat down the ramp.  I did allthe tests in the above video for the booster and it all passed.  I do on occasion get the brake pedal to the floor and it feels like the brakes are grinding but I can't hear them, then when I rev up or accelerate, the brakes work fine.  I get the brake assist light when I get the hard pedal and the floored pedal.

 

Did you connect the brake booster to the intake manifold with one uninterrupted line like i did in my video?

 

Also, that line cant be just any normal hose, it has to be harder so vacuum doesnt suck it closed.

 

If everything else is fine, the only thing left would be to change the Brake booster itself

Posted

Yes, I bought a 3/8 vacuum hose from Napa.  My friend connected his snap on tester to the truck, I was getting 12lbs of vacuum with the vacuum pump with slow recovery, I was only getting 10 lbs with the vacuum coming from the manifold, but recovery time was quick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Most thermostatically controlled ATF systems use a 'wax' pill just like the one in your water thermostat. They work on the expansion volume of the wax and the pill is constructed in such a way as to limit the travel to remain within that range. This means it has an opening temperature often called the 'cracking temperature' and a fully open temperature. For whatever reason oil is designated by it's fully open temperature and water by it's cracking temperature.    Between the two it the "Regulating Temperature" The entire range is about 20 F from closed to open. In your example the lower limit, opening point of 145 F then has a fully open temp of 165 F and a throttling temperature of 155 F.    Thing is, the throttling temperature needs two things to work properly. Enough system load high enough to reach the minimum and a heat sink (cooler/exchanger) large enough to prevent any load applied from exceeding the fully open temperature.    If your system exceeds the fully open temperature it is screaming MORE COOLER.    Here is the silly part of the whole thermostat system where the oil is cooled/heated by the radiator. Nothing is flowing to that system until the oil temperature reaches the cracking temperature unless it is equipped with a minimum flow bypass orifice or a bypass built into the seating surface of the plunger. That system meant to get it up to temp quicker isn't doing a thing until WORK drives if from ambient to cracking temp. One a cold winter day, like zero F, it may never get hotter than about 110 F. Sometimes not even that.    People forget or are young enough to not know that until this millennia transmissions were cooled by the radiator cold tank alone and without a thermostat at all.  In the 50's they weren't even cooled. OEMs learn everything the hard way.    When an OEM tells you the trans "Works best" between 175 F and 220 F it means works best for THEM. The transmission thermostat is fuel play. If you watch you trans temps like I do you will learn that it may take a hundred miles if you are not towing and not driving more than say 55-60 mph on a zero F day to even reach 120 F and it might sit there all day if it's colder. Yet if functions perfectly over about 100 F. It may need to get a bit warmer for the fuel and spark maps to go without an multiplier.    Worry more about too hot. Use a cooler large enough to put that thermostat in range.         
    • Around 2008 if memory serves they took sulfur out. That was when diesel went up. 
    • Question for you Grumpy, why is diesel so much more than gasoline? Seems to me that it may be slightly a little less refined than gas and it doesn't have 10% alcohol which presumably lowers the price of gas
    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...