Jump to content

Best Waterproof Hard Tonneau?


Recommended Posts

Posted
I have the Lomax Tri-fold on a '19 GMC and I love it. It looks good and keeps the bed drier than any other tonneau I've had.  I have no concerns keeping my clothing duffles back there when driving in the rain. I originally had some minimal drippage on the cab side corners, but a little heat gun to reshape the rubber than was smushed in shipping fixed it up. Don't expect it to be perfectly dry like a cap, but it's close. It's well made.  As for support I had a fingernail-sized paint flake come off after a few months and the sent me a whole new cover (plus shipping both ways) under warranty. The main tailgate opens and closes smoothly with the cover down, and the only negative is the mini-tailgate on the GMC will open, but not close without lifting the rear third flap. If you need the whole bed, it comes off with no tools. I can get it off by myself but its heavy so a second set of hands makes it easier to get off.
 
 

I also have the LoMax and completely agree with you on all accounts. It’s my favorite folding tonneau cover out there. And that’s coming from someone who places high priority on keeping out rain/water.
  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I also have the LoMax and completely agree with you on all accounts. It’s my favorite folding tonneau cover out there. And that’s coming from someone who places high priority on keeping out rain/water.
Isnt the Lomax the one that is the flimsy sheet of aluminum?

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

Posted
2 hours ago, ShamrockShooter said:

Isnt the Lomax the one that is the flimsy sheet of aluminum?

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
 

No it's not flimsy at all. It's around 1/8 inch, it won't flex.

Posted
No it's not flimsy at all. It's around 1/8 inch, it won't flex.

Yeah, not sure where the idea came from that it’s flimsy, but it’s not. 1/8 inch thick sounds about right, plus it has square tube framing on the underside of it.
Posted

Yeah, not sure where the idea came from that it’s flimsy, but it’s not. 1/8 inch thick sounds about right, plus it has square tube framing on the underside of it.
I watched a YouTube video review of a Lomax that someone had vynal wrapped and he commented about how thin it was and had some wobble and flex to it. Never seen one in person.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk

Posted
16 hours ago, ShamrockShooter said:

I watched a YouTube video review of a Lomax that someone had vynal wrapped and he commented about how thin it was and had some wobble and flex to it. Never seen one in person.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
 

So I just measured the panel at 0.075 inch. The supporting tubes are 0.90 inch AL channel and tubes. I wouldn't stand on it, probably shouldn't even sit on it right in the middle, but IMO it has the sweet spot of low weight vs enough strength.

Posted
On 2/15/2020 at 10:50 AM, batman900 said:

Fell in love as soon as you posted this picture and then saw that it costs 2 grand..... Now I'm sad again.

+1 for the Diamondback.  Yes, it's expensive.  But, it will last a long time.  I've had mine almost a year, and it still likes new.

 

I followed the "buy once, cry once" approaches and have no regrets.  

 

What I like about it:

 

1) Durable.  You can put 1,600 pounds on top (though I see the side rails of are only rated for 1,000 lbs).  I expect many years of use of this cover.

 

2) Utility.  My favorite thing is dropping the multi-tailgate on my GMC, which gives me an easy way to walk up and sit on top of the Diamondback.

 

3) No water issues for me, though you do need to adjust it to make it so.

 

4) It's made in the US from a great company that cares about their customers. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...