Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The 2019 Sierra HD had a manual tilt lever and telescoping lever on the left side of the steering column.  The 2020 Sierra HD has one (1) manual lever, for both functions, on the underneath side of the steering column.  The one lever, with dual functions,  is hard to locate and not user friendly?   

Edited by Powell
I made a mistake and message wasn't clear. Wrong vehicle.
Posted

I've had both on GM and Ford trucks/suvs. Honestly, the manual tilt and telescopic steering wheels have more range than the electronic ones. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Powell said:

The 2019 Sierra HD Denali had electronic tilt and telescoping steering column but the 2020 has is manual.  GMC doesn't offer the electronic, why the change?  The manual version is hard to locate and not user friendly?    

Not trying to be argumentative, but are you sure you 2019HD Denali was electric tilt/telescope? 

 

I'm only curious because my 18 HD Denali doesn't have it, so I got  curious and looked in the 18/19 order guides and can't find it there. 

 

Posted

Senior Enthusiast,

Thank you for pointing out my mistake.  To my knowledge the Sierra has never had a electronic tilt/telescoping steering wheel.  I should have made my statement clearer.  I was thinking about my other vehicle that does have the electronics.  It might be nice if GM would offer electronic tilt and telescoping in the Sierra. 

Thanks again. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Powell said:

Senior Enthusiast,

Thank you for pointing out my mistake.  To my knowledge the Sierra has never had a electronic tilt/telescoping steering wheel.  I should have made my statement clearer.  I was thinking about my other vehicle that does have the electronics.  It might be nice if GM would offer electronic tilt and telescoping in the Sierra. 

Thanks again. 

No problem, I thought maybe I was missing something. 

 

Wife has GM vehicle with the electric tilt/telescope.

I prefer the tilt as it is in the truck -- but I do find the trucks telescope annoying.  Fortunately I rarely use the telescope. 

Tilt gets used almost every trip.

  • 6 months later...
Posted

My 2020hd is supposed to have manual tilt and telescoping wheel, however to this point with the lever under the wheel I have not been able to get it to telescope in or out at all.  

Posted

I have an LT and mine does.....in and out, up or down

 

i do prefer the wheel move independently of column like my tundra did

Posted
11 hours ago, Dunn said:

I have an LT and mine does.....in and out, up or down

How much does it telescope? 

 

There is no movement in or out on my wheel with the lever down.  

Posted (edited)
On 9/15/2020 at 4:29 AM, shadow gray 2020 hd said:

How much does it telescope? 

 

There is no movement in or out on my wheel with the lever down.  

idk probably 3 inches or so.....i am on taller side so i need that wheel to come closer to me....my 2019 RST was exactly same setup.....i would take it to service....idk if custom or WT trims get it but be stupid if they didnt.....i believe you have an LT though ?

Edited by Dunn
Posted
9 hours ago, Dunn said:

i believe you have an LT though ?

Yes, an lt.  Have the allstar edition and convenience package 2 as well.  It listed on the packages that the truck is supposed to have tilt and telescoping wheel.  I am 6'2", would be nice if it worked, but I am getting maybe a 1/4 inch at most, I don't want to put more force on the wheel than I have tried already.  

Posted (edited)

My LT has the manual tilt telescope with the lever under the steering wheel. I also have like 2-3 inches of telescope movement, sounds like something might be binding up on you?

Whoops, wrong forum, I’ve got a’17. 

Edited by gearheadesw
  • Thanks 1
Posted

it should work....take it to dealer

 

i dont think you even have to have any pkg for telescoping wheel.....standard it should work on LT

  • Like 1
Posted

Looked underneath it and see no reason why it should not be working.  The tilt function works fine.  Will definitely be taking it in to a dealership as soon as I get a chance to.  

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...