Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just like CNN running the story about the couple that took Chloroquin and the husband died. One important detail left out by CNN and MSNBC was that the couple actually took fish tank aquarium cleaner. I'd say that changes the entire story. No CNN didn't lie about the story, they just left out the MOST IMPORTANT fact. And the only purpose of the story was to discredit Trump and say he has blood on his hands. What a disgrace and dangerous misuse of their platform.

Edited by graystonelbz
  • Like 5
Posted
2 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

People are worried about financial survival. Who’s making a profit?

Profit, the majority of folks in America doesn't know what profit is and the rest is now knowing what it's like to just survive.  What I didn't know was my neighbor with multiple houses, many businesses, and nice cars was living check to check (the neighbor comment is figurative)

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, graystonelbz said:

Just like CNN running the story about the couple that took Chloroquin and the husband died. One important detail left out by CNN and MSNBC was that the couple actually took fish tank aquarium cleaner. I'd say that changes the entire story. No CNN didn't lie about the story, they just left out the MOST IMPORTANT fact. And the only purpose of the story was to discredit Trump and say he has blood on his hands. What a disgrace and dangerous misuse of their platform.

I read that story online.  They absolutely mentioned that it was fish tank cleaner that contained a form of chloroquin in the article posted on their website.  It was in one of the first 2 paragraphs.  Now if you're talking about the pundits that sensationalize everything (and that goes for every network), then yes they left that out.  That's why I read the story and look at their sources before I make a decision on how to process that information.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ithan Henry said:

I read that story online.  They absolutely mentioned that it was fish tank cleaner that contained a form of chloroquin in the article posted on their website.  It was in one of the first 2 paragraphs.  Now if you're talking about the pundits that sensationalize everything (and that goes for every network), then yes they left that out.  That's why I read the story and look at their sources before I make a decision on how to process that information.

The story should remain the same whether written or in video form. They absolutely made no mention of fish tank cleaner on the news/video portion. Like it or not more people watch than read, that's just how our society is geared. A news outlet knowing that and then taking advantage of that fact makes it even more shameful. So like I said CNN has zero credibility.

Posted
4 minutes ago, graystonelbz said:

The story should remain the same whether written or in video form. They absolutely made no mention of fish tank cleaner on the news/video portion. Like it or not more people watch than read, that's just how our society is geared. A news outlet knowing that and then taking advantage of that fact makes it even more shameful. So like I said CNN has zero credibility.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/23/health/arizona-coronavirus-chloroquine-death/index.html

 

Here's the story BTW.  You responded before I had a chance to edit my post.  EVERY news outlet has this issue with their pundits.  There's always someone that you can find who is an "expert" that will say whatever you want.  That's why I read the online articles or watch my local news.  Much more comprehensive coverage of a story when you're not worried about ratings.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

just another example of the bias media and the f*ckery that they perpetuate. Certain outlets have also decided not to cover the task force press briefings because......they know better and will decide for the people. This has gotten way out of control and I'm tired of it. He's the president like it or not.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Ithan Henry said:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/23/health/arizona-coronavirus-chloroquine-death/index.html

 

Here's the story BTW.  You responded before I had a chance to edit my post.  EVERY news outlet has this issue with their pundits.  There's always someone that you can find who is an "expert" that will say whatever you want.  That's why I read the online articles or watch my local news.  Much more comprehensive coverage of a story when you're not worried about ratings.

I saw the story first on TV and then read about it in the local Arizona newspaper. As you should know, articles don't circulate like media clips do and that particular one ran rampid and was never corrected on TV. Its dishonest with a certain intent.

Posted

Most working people only allow about an hour for news, if that. Then chill with an entertaining program. Usually checking out at 9 or ten. Possibly cuddling with the old lady. So TVs news is usually geared towards like minded watchers. CNN, msnbc with their 3-500K audience. Fox with their 3-5 million.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, graystonelbz said:

just another example of the bias media and the f*ckery that they perpetuate. Certain outlets have also decided not to cover the task force press briefings because......they know better and will decide for the people. This has gotten way out of control and I'm tired of it. He's the president like it or not.

Yeah but I can watch the opposite on Fox News, where they'll bend over backwards to praise and defend him.  Still biased just in the other direction.

 

I've been watching the press briefings.  I've said it before and I'll say it again, Trump needs to stop getting in his own way and just let the experts in the task force do the talking.  Let them take the questions and if he doesn't want them to answer something then he can step in.

  • Like 1
Posted
Yeah but I can watch the opposite on Fox News, where they'll bend over backwards to praise and defend him.  Still biased just in the other direction.
 
I've been watching the press briefings.  I've said it before and I'll say it again, Trump needs to stop getting in his own way and just let the experts in the task force do the talking.  Let them take the questions and if he doesn't want them to answer something then he can step in.

He has to mitigate what lies are spewed about him throughout the day. He said as much. I agree a little less would be nice. He does repeat the same thing mostly. If he got a fair shake he’d probably tone it down. Remember he, he alone talked himself into the presidency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Most working people only allow about an hour for news, if that. Then chill with an entertaining program. Usually checking out at 9 or ten. Possibly cuddling with the old lady. So TVs news is usually geared towards like minded watchers. CNN, msnbc with their 3-500K audience. Fox with their 3-5 million.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fox News it at about 2.4 million, MSNBC is about 1.8 million, and CNN 1 million.  I like to think of it like this, MSNBC and CNN are reaching the same audience kinda like GMC and Chevy both selling trucks, and Fox News is Ford.  In the end, they all get the same amount of viewers.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Ithan Henry said:

Yeah but I can watch the opposite on Fox News, where they'll bend over backwards to praise and defend him.  Still biased just in the other direction.

 

I've been watching the press briefings.  I've said it before and I'll say it again, Trump needs to stop getting in his own way and just let the experts in the task force do the talking.  Let them take the questions and if he doesn't want them to answer something then he can step in.

I can agree both sides have bias. And Trump has been the same since the 1980's and can say too much at times, no argument there. But he is still the President and still pro America which I strongly support. The media wasn't elected to do anything. There job is to report the news, not discredit the President. In no other country do they treat there elected leader the way the US mainstream media does. At the end of the day the president was elected to make decisions, not Anthony Fauci. End of story.

Edited by graystonelbz
  • Like 2
Posted
Fox News it at about 2.4 million, MSNBC is about 1.8 million, and CNN 1 million.  I like to think of it like this, MSNBC and CNN are reaching the same audience kinda like GMC and Chevy both selling trucks, and Fox News is Ford.  In the end, they all get the same amount of viewers.

Did you know CNN pays the airports to carry their feed? Kinda like Impala and rental cars, police cars. It counts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Remember he, he alone talked himself into the presidency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A while back, I watched a very interesting story about the 2016 election and how he hired a company that came up with some of the catch phrases that all his supporters loved.  Like the "lock her up" quote.  It was a company that specifically does this for politicians, they even did work overseas.  I found it quite interesting, never knew such a company existed.  I learned something new.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,022 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...