Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Baseball is trying to come back they say. Without taking up space explaining what their planing. Here’s an idea. Go back to normal starting without the fans. Every body is in an control environment right now. We also have a quick test that’s been developed. Teams have their own planes. Everything can be controlled. If anyone could shake off the bug athletes can. Other sports like NASCAR can to. Players can op out, I’m sure some one would be happy to step in. It can be done, someone needs to step up. First responders face the unknown daily, with no controls. They could control everything.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am missing sports, never realized how bad normal TV has gotten.

 

I was so excited to see racing, any kind, but especially NASCAR, always means spring is close.

 

Yes, I know very trivial in the state the world is in right now, but I would watch anything with out fans being present.

  • Like 4
Posted
4 hours ago, graystonelbz said:

and people aren't comfortable with their lives being destroyed over what might happen. Valid or not all people in tough situations are going to lose faith in all future models of this kind. Never good when you lose the peoples faith.

This is why paying attention in math class during high school is important.  That's when we learn about statistics and how the models must change daily to reflect peoples actions.  If I had a nickel for every time one of my students asked me when we'd use this in real life I'd have my own private island by now.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death
 
This is what "let it rip' looks like. 
LMFAO! 1% kill rates to already sick olds equals bubonic plague now?!?!! Keep that MSNBC fear factor blasting! Down to 3 on vents today - all with something else. Black Death [emoji1787][emoji23][emoji1787][emoji23][emoji1787][emoji23][emoji1787] More like regular ole flu - or not even that!

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

And somehow heart attacks dont happen in blue "hot zones," just covid. Gotta say, they got you fooled...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

And still not a single donated ventilator needed in the state of New York. Not one. But lets make sure we have 50k made a month by auto companies that wont do ****** in these situations (with a real bad virus like SARS or worse - MERS). Viral pneumonias require high inverse ratios and consistent positive end expiratory pressures - these rinky ****** vents wont cut it if we actually want to save the patients. We put flu cases on ECMO when the vents dont do enough. So many lies...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Texas Daddy said:

LMFAO! 1% kill rates to already sick olds equals bubonic plague now?!?!! Keep that MSNBC fear factor blasting! Down to 3 on vents today - all with something else. Black Death emoji1787.pngemoji23.pngemoji1787.pngemoji23.pngemoji1787.pngemoji23.pngemoji1787.png More like regular ole flu - or not even that!

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

 

How do you draw a 1% MR from data that you claim is invalid?

 

The comparison SIR was in propagation rates not death rate. 

Some things should not need explanation.

:wtf:

  • Like 1
Posted

 

How do you draw a 1% MR from data that you claim is invalid?

 

The comparison SIR was in propagation rates not death rate. 

Some things should not need explanation.

:wtf:

When you talk about the severity of a pandemic, you must consider the magnitude in life-years. An Italian who dies at 80 when the life expectancy is 82 has lost 2 life years. H1N1 shifted greatly to the UNDER 65 populous (apparently, 1/3rd of those over 60 had some immunity from years ago), and thus lost many times more life-years than this ever possibly can. PLEASE look up the H1N1 novel flu pandemic of 2009. There is so much information there you need to educate yourself with. The numbers you see now mean nothing without the context of how many are truely affected, and we cant possibly know that until its over...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Right now, its all about drumming up disaster bucks...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

How do you draw a 1% MR from data that you claim is invalid?

 

The comparison SIR was in propagation rates not death rate. 

Some things should not need explanation.

:wtf:

You superior smarter than everybody attitude is funny at this point. You are coming off as a self proclaimed genius posting home made graphs on a truck forum. Unless you want to share your credentials you are just another internet smart guy like all the rest of on here.

Posted

Let’s not start any pissing contests going. This isn’t over yet I hate for it to get shut down. Some people are pretty dramatic in expressing them selves. One thing is certain we’ll all know before too long how this is going to shake out. Sure they’re tripping over themselves over adjusting the numbers down. There’s mitigating factors that could have adjusting the numbers ether way. I suspect just like mask situation. They hit us with high numbers to make us tow the line. Sacrificing some credibility. So let them pat us on the back for doing a good job. Even as we were tripping over our selfs at grocery stores buying toilet paper. While we were 6ft apart.[emoji2957]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, graystonelbz said:

You superior smarter than everybody attitude is funny at this point. You are coming off as a self proclaimed genius posting home made graphs on a truck forum. Unless you want to share your credentials you are just another internet smart guy like all the rest of on here.

Sharing credentials in this format means nothing to me, I have to know you.  That leaves all of us the same, a bunch of internet smart guys.  I take what everyone says with a grain of salt.

Posted

If there’s only one reason to call CNN and MSNBC out for miss information that could harm people. Is there stand against hydroxychlorquine simply because Trump endorses it. Putting people at risk who have the misfortune of relying just on them for news. Shameful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Those mask just wasn't getting it for me, had to resort to a scarf.  Couldn't see a thing, glasses kept fogging up.

Edited by The Zip
Posted
1 hour ago, Texas Daddy said:

When you talk about the severity of a pandemic, you must consider the magnitude in life-years. An Italian who dies at 80 when the life expectancy is 82 has lost 2 life years. H1N1 shifted greatly to the UNDER 65 populous (apparently, 1/3rd of those over 60 had some immunity from years ago), and thus lost many times more life-years than this ever possibly can. PLEASE look up the H1N1 novel flu pandemic of 2009. There is so much information there you need to educate yourself with. The numbers you see now mean nothing without the context of how many are truely affected, and we cant possibly know that until its over...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

Ah, I see the difference now. You prorate life. I count the life of one a hundred the same as the one just born of equal value. 

 

If you prorate you might well be correct in terms of 'life years'. 

 

I guess most of the world shares the prorated life paradigm. Well sort of. They look at your cost vs your productivity in $$$$. Micky "D"s loves kids and those too old to find work that pays an HONEST wage. 

 

How do you suppose this works out if we not only prorate life but assign a $$$$ value based on cost v productivity? Maybe we can assign ventilators based on this. Ya know, CEO's, Presidents, Scientist we try to save. Old people, immigrants, those of low IQ we let fend for themselves. 

 

Absurd you say? Well isn't that what you do when you value based on "life years"? Or maybe you didn't say absurd. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,725
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Griffin Donovan
    Newest Member
    Griffin Donovan
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 768 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hasn't come up in the 3 gm forums I follow. And only gm knows the frequency of failure of that part. LMG, you want a recall so it's replaced for free...
    • You need a better code reader/scanner.  You are missing codes.  Did the dealer give you a copy of the SAVI scan from that visit?     If the fluid hasn't been changed, change it.  Shudder will likely go away.  
    • TLDR to my other post...   Hard. Pass.  Too many what ifs.     Are you set on a 3.0 Duramax?  Have you considered anything not GM just in case?  If you don't have to have a pickup, lots of other options for $27,000 out there.   
    • I see some red flags.   - No mention in the Carfax if the oil pump belt was changed.  LM2s had a 150,000mi service interval, and its got 164,245mi on it.  So right out the gate it needs about $3000-3500 for that to be done before driving it another 150,000mi.  Belt is at the rear of the engine.     - If something happens to the transmission valve body, the special coverage is expired by mileage.  That will likely be an out of pocket expense, with zero or near zero GM participation if something happened even though its in by time.   - 2020 LM2s seem to need timing chains after 80,000mi at some point.  They fixed this end of 2020/starting 2021 model year engines.  They will usually set a P0016 I think?  There is another $8000-10,000 if it needs a chain.  The main chain is at the back, secondary at the front so the pump belt would be done at the same time if it needed chains.     - Long oil change intervals.  7,000-8,000mi on average, probably close to 0% or perhaps to or beyond 0% on the OLM.  Lots of them not at the dealer which makes me wonder how much of the oil ran through that truck was the proper Dexos D rated 0w20 oil and not just gas engine 0w20, which is not the same at all.     - Long fuel filter changes, again likely taking the fuel filter life to 0% or more.  First one went 28,603, second was done 43,094 miles later at 71,697, from there another 46,452mi to 118,149mi, and then the most recent one 37,026mi later at 155,175mi.  So counting its original fuel filter, its had only 4 fuel filters on it.  No bueno IMO.         Good news?    - It has had only two warranty trips to the dealer.  The first free service (end of December 2020 on the Carfax), and the transmission reprogram recall (end of August 2025 on the Carfax).     - Truck did a LOT of moving, so that might explain the lack of emissions related repairs like bad NOX sensors, bad exhaust temp sensors, bad glow plugs, etc.         The "emissions system checked" could just be how something was flagged for Carfax.  GM dealers have to do SAVI reports for warranty repair orders so they scan the truck.  So its possible that is there for that?  
    • Thank you, @Z45!   NOTE - No all repair shop/Dealers reports to Carfax   That is my main concern.  The CARFAX looks way too clean for a 6 year old anything with 164,245 miles.  Even something known for reliability (like many Toyotas) typically has a lot more replaced, like a Nav screen, interior trim, shock/strut, or brake pads.  And surely the last set of tires (installed at ~58k miles) would be bald unless those were all highway miles.   I'm tempted to pay a local dealer to look up the VIN, but am not sure if that will be worthwhile.  Last time I did this, it was 100% useless, and I felt scammed - they noted the bumper was replaced years ago and that's it.  A 5-year old could spot the accident damage, even though nothing was on the CARFAX.   After giving the dealer a call, the truck may have a hard shift, but they have to verify with their mechanic if that's even a concern.  And I've test driven about a dozen of these now, many near Chicago, and half the trucks shift hard/odd at all throttle positions.  The ones with aftermarket lifts/larger tires shift terrible, and 3 stock trucks shifted so violently I thought the transmission valve body was going out.   At this point I'm conflicted, as I need a vehicle, and am coming up short locally.  Northern trucks in this price range tend to have either multiple owners, a lot of mods (lifts/oversized tires without re-gearing), and are generally in rougher shape.   If this truck showed up in your neighborhood for $27k and you had to purchase it sight-unseen, with the possibility of needing a 10L80 rebuild, torque converter, or rear end - would you do it?  I'm convinced most of the 10L80 trucks I test drove are broken, they can't all shift so bad, with massive flares/slipping/lurching and mis-matched downshifts like a teen driver learning stick.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...