Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
There are some are interesting finds!  Are you actually looking to buy, or just spending extra time on the computer?   I'm keeping my eye on a '71 F250 that appears to be in extraordinarily good condition.  Even though, it's 50 years old, the only modern amenity I'd miss is decent fuel economy.  You could watch the gas gauge move on those beasts!  I don't have the retirement income to buy an additional vehicle but I would trade/give up a current vehicle.  It would have to be an affordable, comfortable and safe daily driver which is a hard find!  The bar is incredibly high when it becomes a choice between it and my '15 SLE that is in excellent condition with nothing owing!

My 92 Avalanche fits that bill. If a clean trailblazer ss shows up things could change. Luckily I don’t have use it as a trip vehicle. Gas mileage would be the deterrent. A few years before retirement I just worked out the office. I was able to drive toys back and forth the 9 miles. A 65 elcamino, 65 GMC retro ride, 98 two door Tahoe, and my 92 Chevy 383 whipple powered pickup. I didn’t have them all at the same time. About one a year. The exception was the 92 Chevy. The Avalanche replaced it. So far I’m fighting the urge for a performance build. At going on 66 the fast bug is fading some... I think.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:


My 92 Avalanche 

It looks 10 years younger in the picture! 😉 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Donstar said:

Please tell us about what you've done/doing with your extra time.  If Covid19 hasn't impacted your schedule then no need to respond.  The ship has sailed on the mask, hand washing and political debates around Covid19. 

 

(should be a few posts up 😉 )

been building a compound  to ward off dipshit canucks

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, nqabigt said:

been building a compound  to ward off dipshit canucks

Coinciding with the pandemic we have experienced a heightened awareness of how we treat each other.  We don't have a say on where we are born or on our DNA but we have control of our words.  "Canuck", for example,  is a word that can be a friendly reference but used in the manner above is derogatory (slur).  I would have requested such a comment to be removed, but it does speak to something many of us have done during our Covid19 spare time.  I have made a concerted effort to increase my awareness of how I reference or speak about other people.  There are terms that we know are wrong but others that require more research.  I once thought that referring to myself as "colour blind" was an acceptable stance on racism.  Researching this opened up a whole new level of understanding.  This time last year I would have been insulted by your comment but not as offended. However, we all need to stop discrimination, even in jest. Below is an excerpt from an article I found online regarding the term "Canuck".  It also shows discussion on this term has been around for decades.

In his book, "Safire's Political Dictionary," Martin's colleague William Safire noted that the Oxford English Dictionary labels it “in U.S. usage, generally derogatory” but then he quoted from a 1977 letter to him from then Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau: (Pierre Trudeau was our PM and is the father of our current Prime Minister)

 As with all slang, and especially that of nationality, the implications of the word vary a great deal according to the context and the intent of the speaker or writer….Many Canadians feel [“Canuck”] refers to all Canadians, some believe it is Eastern Canadians, other that it is French Canadians, while the majority have rarely heard it used in any context…..Whether or not you committed an ethnic slur (in using it) would depend entirely on the way the word was used…..To me, a slang term applied to a nationality by a person of a different nationality could, under certain conditions, be construed as a slur.

When the term "Canuck" is preceded by dipshit there is little doubt on the intent.  I have no issue with you expressing concern over anything I've written and I welcome the opportunity to explain myself.  However, if I continue while ignoring this issue then it suggests I support the use of slurs against others.

  • Like 1
Posted

When the term "Canuck" is preceded by dipshit there is little doubt on the intent.  I have no issue with you expressing concern over anything I've written and I welcome the opportunity to explain myself.  However, if I continue while ignoring this issue then it suggests I support the use of slurs against others.

Or, a person can just not give a crap what someone says to them or calls them, especially a stranger. The person being told something or overhearing something needs to figure out why they care so much, and why let it bother them. Why let the other person win. Why give them the satisfaction to know they accomplished exactly what they wanted to do. Also, if its unintentional then I really just can't care.

Then there is perception. The king of all things these days. The way someone perceives something is their own issue. 100 people can perceive something one way and 100 others can perceive the exact same thing differently. Look at so called hate speech.



Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
57 minutes ago, Bash74 said:

Or, a person can just not give a crap what someone says to them or calls them, especially a stranger. 

Stranger or not,  my  point was about using a person's place of origin or their DNA as a slur.  We can express  disagreement or anger with an individual without using terms that can be perceived as a slight against their birthplace, colour, religion etc.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Donstar said:

Stranger or not,  my  point was about using a person's place of origin or their DNA as a slur.  We can express  disagreement or anger with an individual without using terms that can be perceived as a slight against their birthplace, colour, religion etc.  

or simply mind your own business and not tell someone else how to act, talk or respond

btw i was trying to help someone  about their weed problem

Posted
Stranger or not,  my  point was about using a person's place of origin or their DNA as a slur.  We can express  disagreement or anger with an individual without using terms that can be perceived as a slight against their birthplace, colour, religion etc.  

My point is why care anyways. If you dont care it won't bother you. If I get upset or bothered by what someone says to me, they didn't upset me, I let myself get upset. Like I said perception is on the person that is perceiving something not on the other person.

 

I don't go around purposly saying things that is wrong against their birthplace, color, religion. I don't, because there is no reason. It's a waist of time, especially if they just don't care or ignore it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, nqabigt said:

 

btw i was trying to help someone  about their weed problem

I assumed it was my comment following your information on weeds that caused you concern.  I wrote it before the comments about weeds showed up and when I submitted,  it was out of queue.  I edited with -  (should be a few posts up😉  ) -  but probably wasn't clear enough.  I apologize for the upset.

Posted

Every year we get a new date decal to affix to our license plates.  I am very careful with the process when dealing with my truck, car and motorcycle .  However, my 1966 homemade utility trailer simply has the decal slapped on to cover the previous years' decal.  I decided to be more careful when I renewed registration yesterday because it's going to get another rebuild/refresh if Covid keeps me from travelling this spring.   I knew the decal situation was getting out of hand and this was confirmed when I peeled down to July 1990! 

This is how my trailer looked shortly after its last refresh.  The frame was blasted and painted.  Wood, axle, springs and wheels were replaced.  The decal was for fun but the trailer works hard and is out in the open all year round.

 

DSCF0013.JPG.4d365b7869a964f74f6ddf7f2e76dfe5.JPG

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

One thing I miss about the Marine Corps is how hardened everybody is. You can't insult Marines, unless you're a Marine and know what button to push. Call a Marine a crayon eater and they'll tell you which color is their favorite flavor. I wish the rest of the world was just as hardened.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
On 3/17/2021 at 8:43 AM, Donstar said:

Are you actually looking to buy, or just spending extra time on the computer? 

I'm kinda in between.

I had a '77 J10 Honcho with a 401 cui engine, I sold it before I moved to Canada. Still regret it, but at the time I didn't have much of a choice.

Life got in the way of pursuing my desire to purchase a "new" one, but I'm getting itchy again.

It's hard to find a matching # truck with a 401. And, I'm not the only one looking for a truck in decent shape and all original. ...🙄

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Donstar said:

Stranger or not,  my  point was about using a person's place of origin or their DNA as a slur.  We can express  disagreement or anger with an individual without using terms that can be perceived as a slight against their birthplace, colour, religion etc.  

When I get those comments about my origins (like "Nazi" or  "Heil Hitler" etc)., all what pops into my mind is "at which grade did you drop out of school? 3, 5...?"

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • Like 2
Posted
One thing I miss about the Marine Corps is how hardened everybody is. You can't insult Marines, unless you're a Marine and know what button to push. Call a Marine a crayon eater and they'll tell you which color is their favorite flavor. I wish the rest of the world was just as hardened.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk


This is true. The stuff said directly to my face in boot camp many years ago would make many people now break down and cry. It was for the best though. Got to have that thick skin to serve.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
12 hours ago, j-ten-ner said:

When I get those comments about my origins (like "Nazi" or  "Heil Hitler" etc)., all what pops into my mind is "at which grade did you drop out of school? 3, 5...?"

 

so long

j-ten-ner

I grew up post WWII with relatives who represented (fought for) both "sides" in the war .(Norway/Germany).  The words you give were allowed to flourish in our schools and many of our homes.  I saw first-hand the toll these insidiousness slurs took on very strong people (thick-skinned) over time.  I remember an uncle in particular who was commonly referred to as, "the crout."    All of us kids thought it was acceptable vernacular as we heard it at school and in our homes.  I was present when one of his co-workers referred to him as the crout for the last time.  I suspect there was more going on in his life that helped in causing him to snap but we all have stuff, especially with Covid.   I am glad you speak up when you are referred to in this manner.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,872 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...