Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all, 

I wanted some input. So I’ve got an 18 silverado and recently put on a 5inch lift about a month ago. At about 3 weeks I tried to engage the 4wd and had humming and shaking on coast. I hadn’t used it since lifting.  So I took the shop where I had it installed and they said they had a guy with a similar issue so they opened up where my front differential fluid is at and it was full of metal shavings. They checked the lift and everything looked perfect. So I took to the dealer I bought it at and they confirmed a front differential failure. The gm area director voided my warranty and said they wouldn’t pay for the differential failure. (According to the dealer) I’ve talked to gm and the dealer and keep getting a run around. They won’t say the lift caused the failure but said the warranty is void and won’t fix it. I’ve looked through everything they’ve sent me about the warranty and cannot find anything where it specifically says lifting it causes a void in warranty. Only that If they show the lift caused the failure. I seem to be getting nowhere and wanted to see if anyone has had any issues with this. I’m fully prepared to fight this because it seems unjust. I understand pay to play but this isn’t the lifts fault. I’ve also looked at the Magnuson- Moss act and it sounds to me that they should be fixing it unless they can show me the lift caused it. The truck has about 32,000 miles on it and is paid off. Thank you for all your opinions. 

Posted
Hey all, 
I wanted some input. So I’ve got an 18 silverado and recently put on a 5inch lift about a month ago. At about 3 weeks I tried to engage the 4wd and had humming and shaking on coast. I hadn’t used it since lifting.  So I took the shop where I had it installed and they said they had a guy with a similar issue so they opened up where my front differential fluid is at and it was full of metal shavings. They checked the lift and everything looked perfect. So I took to the dealer I bought it at and they confirmed a front differential failure. The gm area director voided my warranty and said they wouldn’t pay for the differential failure. (According to the dealer) I’ve talked to gm and the dealer and keep getting a run around. They won’t say the lift caused the failure but said the warranty is void and won’t fix it. I’ve looked through everything they’ve sent me about the warranty and cannot find anything where it specifically says lifting it causes a void in warranty. Only that If they show the lift caused the failure. I seem to be getting nowhere and wanted to see if anyone has had any issues with this. I’m fully prepared to fight this because it seems unjust. I understand pay to play but this isn’t the lifts fault. I’ve also looked at the Magnuson- Moss act and it sounds to me that they should be fixing it unless they can show me the lift caused it. The truck has about 32,000 miles on it and is paid off. Thank you for all your opinions. 
If they can't prove the lift caused the failure then they have to cover it. If it failed again then they could point to the lift as the cause. I had a strut squeaking. Service manager claimed it was my leveling kit. He said he would cover it once but when it happens again GM will fight it. The replacement never squeaked at least to the point I went full Fox shocks all the way around.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado

Posted
28 minutes ago, tenscourts said:

If they can't prove the lift caused the failure then they have to cover it. If it failed again then they could point to the lift as the cause. I had a strut squeaking. Service manager claimed it was my leveling kit. He said he would cover it once but when it happens again GM will fight it. The replacement never squeaked at least to the point I went full Fox shocks all the way around.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado
 

Thank you! That’s what I thought. I keep asking them for proof and they keep telling me I’ll have to pay them to take it apart. And I tell them you have to provide me proof to deny the claim. 

Posted
Thank you! That’s what I thought. I keep asking them for proof and they keep telling me I’ll have to pay them to take it apart. And I tell them you have to provide me proof to deny the claim. 
If they flagged your truck as voided warranty I'm not sure any dealer can help you. I would also think they would need to provide a reason for voiding the warranty. Call another dealer and see if they can confirm the voided warranty. Ask for the reason in writing. Call GM and start a complaint. And be sure to hammer the them on any surveys you receive. I'd try all of that and if you still can't get anywhere my next step would be a lawyer but you can do the rest for free. If the shop that did the work is reputable they make can write you a letter or something as well. The shop I use does upfits for dealers so it's hard for them to cry fowl when they they are using the same shop.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, tenscourts said:

If they flagged your truck as voided warranty I'm not sure any dealer can help you. I would also think they would need to provide a reason for voiding the warranty. Call another dealer and see if they can confirm the voided warranty. Ask for the reason in writing. Call GM and start a complaint. And be sure to hammer the them on any surveys you receive. I'd try all of that and if you still can't get anywhere my next step would be a lawyer but you can do the rest for free. If the shop that did the work is reputable they make can write you a letter or something as well. The shop I use does upfits for dealers so it's hard for them to cry fowl when they they are using the same shop.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado
 

I believe they did flag it. I’ve escalated it on the phone with gm. They should be reaching out to me. They have yet to give me an explanation other than the lift. Which is illegal. I’ve got a lawyer lined up. No proof as to why it’s voided. I was gonna call another dealer tomorrow morning. 

Posted
I believe they did flag it. I’ve escalated it on the phone with gm. They should be reaching out to me. They have yet to give me an explanation other than the lift. Which is illegal. I’ve got a lawyer lined up. No proof as to why it’s voided. I was gonna call another dealer tomorrow morning. 
Sounds like you've got it covered. Good luck!

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado

Posted

pm me your vin. I can run it to see if there is a warranty block.

Posted
So you think I’ve got a case then? That they should be covering this? And to never go to this dealer again? Haha 
As long as the lift you had installed was meant for a 4wd and properly installed I don't know why you wouldn't. Obviously research your lift to see if anyone else has experienced the same issue. Was the lift from a reputable brand?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado

Posted

Was the diff tipped to align the drive shaft, or any other reason?

Posted
16 minutes ago, tenscourts said:

As long as the lift you had installed was meant for a 4wd and properly installed I don't know why you wouldn't. Obviously research your lift to see if anyone else has experienced the same issue. Was the lift from a reputable brand?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado
 

It should be. It was installed by a professional shop. It’s a rough country lift. I don’t do any off-roading or anything like that, so it was for purely looks. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, tbarn said:

Was the diff tipped to align the drive shaft, or any other reason?

 

I believe it was. It came in a kit they ordered and they do hundreds of those type of lifts. They haven’t had any issues with it. 

Posted
It should be. It was installed by a professional shop. It’s a rough country lift. I don’t do any off-roading or anything like that, so it was for purely looks. 
I would imagine rough country did plenty of testing with their lifts. Even if there is added stress I can't imagine it would cause immediate failure.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...