Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Beside stiffer springs. Is there an axle size, ring size, etc diff between the 2020 2500 and 3500 hd diesels?

Posted
21 hours ago, jjackkrash said:

In the diesels, the 3500 has a bigger ring gear (12") and full torque in first gear; 2500 is torque limited in first gear and has an 11.5" ring gear.   

Is this very noticeable 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Akwagon said:

Is this very noticeable 

I have a 2020 3500 DRW; I don't really have any seat time in a 2020 2500, so I can't say if the difference is noticeable.  I can say the 2020 Duramax with the 10-speed tranny is the bees knees and it holds my 19k lbs. fiver at 70 mph rolling down the freeway nicely.  Its a fantastic engine/tranny combo.  

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/26/2020 at 12:45 AM, Akwagon said:

Is this very noticeable 

I didn’t drive a 2500, but my srw 3500 will break free with modest acceleration or taking off towing.  The thing moves...

Posted

The 2500HD's are not torque limited in any gear as has been stated above.  The 2500HD's start from a stop in second gear in normal driving mode.  They only start in 1st. gear when in tow/haul mode.  That makes sense because the low 1st. gear is overkill when not pulling a load.

Posted
21 hours ago, unit said:

The 2500HD's are not torque limited in any gear as has been stated above.  The 2500HD's start from a stop in second gear in normal driving mode.  They only start in 1st. gear when in tow/haul mode.  That makes sense because the low 1st. gear is overkill when not pulling a load.

2500s have some very mild torque limiting in lower gears.  It's hard to tell difference between 2500 and 3500.  The 10 speeds start in 2nd gear unless in tow/haul for all models.

 

#iworkforGM 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Where did you get that information that 2500's are torque limited in any gear?  That goes against everything I've read about these trucks.

 

Below is an exact quote from Car and Driver Magazine:

"The optional engine remains the largely carryover 6.6-liter Duramax V-8 turbo-diesel—445 horses and 910 lb-ft—but is now mated to a 10-speed version of the excellent Allison automatic gearbox, up from the previous six-cog unit. The additional gears helped allow GM's engineers to lower the HD diesel's axle ratio from 3.73:1 to 3.42:1 to reduce engine speeds for a quieter ride when cruising. Although the Duramax falls short of the Ram HD's available 1000-lb-ft rating, the 10-speed combined with stronger drivetrain components allows diesel Silverado HDs to utilize their full amount of twist in first gear, unlike the previous models, which electronically limited the diesel's torque outputs. Among the myriad upgrades are larger, one-piece driveshafts and stouter axles with huge 11.5-inch ring gears on 2500HD models and full 12-inchers on the 3500HD".

 

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a25384331/2020-chevrolet-silverado-hd-2500-3500-photos-info/

 

Many other sources say the same thing.

Edited by unit
Add content
Posted
20 hours ago, MTU Alum said:

2500s have some very mild torque limiting in lower gears.  It's hard to tell difference between 2500 and 3500.  The 10 speeds start in 2nd gear unless in tow/haul for all models.

 

#iworkforGM 

Any idea why GM would program very mild torque limiting that's hard to tell?   If it's that minor, why do it at all? 

Posted
3 hours ago, unit said:

Where did you get that information that 2500's are torque limited in any gear?  That goes against everything I've read about these trucks.

 

Below is an exact quote from Car and Driver Magazine:

"The optional engine remains the largely carryover 6.6-liter Duramax V-8 turbo-diesel—445 horses and 910 lb-ft—but is now mated to a 10-speed version of the excellent Allison automatic gearbox, up from the previous six-cog unit. The additional gears helped allow GM's engineers to lower the HD diesel's axle ratio from 3.73:1 to 3.42:1 to reduce engine speeds for a quieter ride when cruising. Although the Duramax falls short of the Ram HD's available 1000-lb-ft rating, the 10-speed combined with stronger drivetrain components allows diesel Silverado HDs to utilize their full amount of twist in first gear, unlike the previous models, which electronically limited the diesel's torque outputs. Among the myriad upgrades are larger, one-piece driveshafts and stouter axles with huge 11.5-inch ring gears on 2500HD models and full 12-inchers on the 3500HD".

 

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a25384331/2020-chevrolet-silverado-hd-2500-3500-photos-info/

 

 

Many other sources say the same thing.

I wouldn't trust what you read.  I was at the media event with the journalists and the slide said 3500 models.  The journalists did not put a model in their article.  There are very few good journalists that understand trucks.

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted
2 hours ago, CRApex said:

Any idea why GM would program very mild torque limiting that's hard to tell?   If it's that minor, why do it at all? 

The 11.5 axle will not last over time at full power.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted (edited)

I don't automatically trust what I read but multiple articles say the same thing. I gave but one example from a widely respected source. Why should I believe you know what you're talking about?  Show us the proof of your claim?

Edited by unit
Added wording.
Posted
2 hours ago, unit said:

I don't automatically trust what I read but multiple articles say the same thing. I gave but one example from a widely respected source. Why should I believe you know what you're talking about?  Show us the proof of your claim?

This was the closest proof I could find, but it’s definitely true

092C29A8-30FD-4E02-8C24-27679A840A51.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,615 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...