Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

what is the build code for the roof marker lights?

can somebody that has them, post a pic of your window sticker please?

 

I am looking at a truck that is in transit still and I am trying to determine if it has roof marker lights. If so, they are a deal breaker. 

 

TIA

Posted (edited)

Unlike previous years the 2020 HD’s have roof marker lights as standard equipment 

 

Nevermind, that statement only applies to the GMC, you can still get the Chevy without 

Edited by brclark82
Posted (edited)

They are optional equipment on BOTH Chevrolet and GMC.  Denali and all duallies (Chevy and GMC) they are standard equipment.  

 

Option code is U01

 

Trucks with emissions code YF5 California state emissions requirements you can't get the roof lamps on those.  

 

Why are they a deal breaker?  The OE ones rarely leak compared to all the aftermarket ones out there.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

Never owned a pickup without them... even my older F-150s had the factory units.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

They are also included in a bunch of 2500 optional packages. (might find the code for the package, but not see UO1 in the listing)

 

2500 GMC

U01         Lamps, Smoked Amber roof marker, (LED)
Sierra -  Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements. 
SLE -  Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements. Included with (PCQ) SLE Convenience Package. 
SLT -  Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements. Included with (PCY) SLT Convenience Package. 
AT4 -  Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements. Included with (PDO) AT4 Preferred Package. 

Denali  - Std, but not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements.

 

2500 Chev 

U01         Lamps, Smoked Amber roof marker, (LED)
WT and LT -  Included with (ANQ) Alaskan Snow Plow Special Edition. Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements. 
Custom, LTZ and HC -  Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements. 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, newdude said:

They are optional equipment on BOTH Chevrolet and GMC.  Denali and all duallies (Chevy and GMC) they are standard equipment.  

 

Option code is U01

 

Trucks with emissions code YF5 California state emissions requirements you can't get the roof lamps on those.  

 

Why are they a deal breaker?  The OE ones rarely leak compared to all the aftermarket ones out there.  

this makes sense. the particular truck I am looking at, is a 3500 SRW Denail with California emissions. I don't see them listed anywhere on the build sheet or the generic window sticker on the website.

also, I cannot chose them as an option on the GMC website, but I can on the Chevy

 

I don't like them, so I don't want them

Edited by kylant
Posted

I remember I used to LOATHE these things back in the day, I love them to death now haha. They look so sick! c28aff4b3741fb5e28764c91cb02ee72.jpg

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, gearheadesw said:

We don't call them clearance lights anymore?

I do, but  the order guide calls them roof lamps.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, kylant said:

what is the purpose of them anyway?

Originally they (and still are) were mandated by the government to alert other drivers that a larger vehicle was approaching.  I believe if the truck is over 80” wide they are required.  They expanded to smaller vehicles because many, including me, think they look pretty cool.  When I look at an HD without them it almost seems like something is missing..

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Cosmic Charlie said:

so why with Cali emissions you get NO clearance lights ?

AFAIK, it's Cali regs. 

 

In any case, if Cali emissions, only the DRW trucks get the roof lights.

Posted

California, such a beautiful state, mountains, ocean coasts, desert landscapes, more mountains,

 

 

 

 

 

 

And then the political atmosphere suffocates and kills you, nice.

  • Like 3
Posted
On ‎8‎/‎6‎/‎2020 at 11:51 AM, newdude said:

They are optional equipment on BOTH Chevrolet and GMC.  Denali and all duallies (Chevy and GMC) they are standard equipment.  

 

Option code is U01

 

Trucks with emissions code YF5 California state emissions requirements you can't get the roof lamps on those.  

 

Why are they a deal breaker?  The OE ones rarely leak compared to all the aftermarket ones out there.  

Thank you!  Now I know that I am not crazy!  I saw a Denali SRW the other day without roof lamps and was just dumbfounded (here in CO), it must have been a Cali truck.  At least we can spot them coming

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,793 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...