Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2001 Sierra 1500 Ext Cab 4.8 4wd 135,000 miles. Throwing a P0446 Evap Code. Cleared code tried just retightening gas cap. No luck light back on.

 

From what I gather there are several causes of this code to include:

 

1. Gas Cap 

2. EVAP Canister Solenoid Vent Valve
3. EVAP Canister Purge Valve

4. Tank Pressure Switch

 

Also any faulty wiring/hoses to these components. 
 

I do not have access to an expensive scanner that will test functionality of these components. I hate blindly throwing parts at something but I'm a bit blind here without the use of a scanner.

 

Is there a pretty common part that causes P0446?

 

My plan of attack is based on easiest-hardest to access parts.

 

1. New Gas Cap

2. New Canister Purge Valve

3. New Canister Vent Valve

4. New pressure switch (looks like bed will need to be removed for this although I did find some Youtube videos where they were able to replace w/o removal).

 

What have you found to be the common faulty part with P0446?

Posted

Must be pretty common because mine occasionally throws the same code. It tends to go away though for weeks at a time before returning.  

Posted

This is a very common problem and GM released a TSB on it.  TSB 04-06-04-055A Dated 03/20/2006.  Here is a link to the TSB:

http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/travist80/2009-04-08_014020_Vent+Valve.pdf

 

In short, the air filter for the EVAP vent valve is upgraded and the air filter for it is moved to a place near the top of the transmission.  I replaced mine in 2015 using the Standard Motor Parts kit, part number CP454, and have not had any trouble since.  It was about haf the cost of the GM/ACDelco kit.

Posted

P0446 is burned into my soul.

 

I chased this problem for a very long time and replaced one part at a time, same as you with your strategy. Eventually replaced every component. I have heard stories of dealerships that would completely replace the EVAP system if still under warranty and then total the vehicle if P0446 came back after that. I ended up replacing the entire EVAP system short of the gas tank. I eventually bought a smoke tool and did the pressurized smoke test, only to find no leaks (I should have done this first, there is an inexpensive one on Amazon that uses 12v battery with mineral oil).

You can test both valves by giving them 12v and seeing if you can push air through them, no need to replace them if the valves cycle with 12v.

I can't tell you how many times I took my truck bed off working on this, it was ridiculous. So heavy and hard to do alone. I even wired into the sensors so I could read them on my Fluke in the cab, because the EVAP test takes so long to run and complete. Anyway I went through great lengths to troubleshoot this on my own.

One night I was up late and on my second glass of bourbon and found a guy on Youtube who has a video series on EVAP systems and how they are designed and work. It was much like a college course. Probably 80 hours of videos. I think he was the engineer who designed the evap emissions system on modern vehicles if I recall correctly.

Anyway I benefited from his lectures on YouTube and got a much deeper understanding about how the evap system software works in the truck's computer. In the most basic language, the computer looks for a specific set of parameters from the sensors and plugs it into a formula and expects a certain range of results. One of the variables is a change of fuel level before and after the test. This was one angle I hadn't thought of so I took the truck bed off for the 100+th time and inspected all of the fuel pump/fuel gauge wiring. I noticed one of the fuel pump ground wires getting hot after letting the truck run for 20 or 30 minutes with the bed off and decided I'd replace it. 

New wire, flux, solder, dielectric grease, heat shrink, about ten cents total fixed the problem.

I was an afternoon away from programming an arduino to fake the sensor parameters necessary to trick the computer into thinking there was nothing wrong with the EVAP system.

Posted

FriendlyMan, thanks for the information.  I had problems getting the EVAP system to pass the tests as well.  Drove with less than half a tank of gas; drove early in the morning, late at night, etc.  Finally began looking at the intake air temperature (IAT) and engine coolant temperature (ECT) sensors, and noticed that there was what I considered to be too wide of a difference between the temperatures reported by the two sensors.  I would up changing the ECT sensor and bingo!  Cold engine temps were much closer and finally, all the emission systems readiness tests passed.  Drove to the emissions testing station and finally got a passing test!

Posted (edited)
On 10/3/2020 at 8:32 PM, FriendlyMan said:

P0446 is burned into my soul.

I can't tell you how many times I took my truck bed off working on this, it was ridiculous. So heavy and hard to do alone.

Thanks very much for the info FriendlyMan. Looks like I may be headed down a similar path...

 

I was excited since after I put the new fuel cap on the SES light stayed off for awhile. Came back on today.

 

I crawled under the truck expecting to see a round vent solenoid but nope, mine is the rectangular style above the fuel tank between the cab and bed. Only way to access it is bed removal ugh. Mine is this style shown below:

 

3-CE1-E43-F-64-A8-4395-996-C-154-FEC6127

 

Been planning on doing much needed corrosion control anyway and now would be a good time to do it. I will replace the vent solenoid AND the fuel tank pressure switch since that too is on top of the tank.

 

Before all that I will go ahead and put a new purge solenoid in. Easy enough right on top of the engine.

 

Man crap like this makes me miss my 77' K10! 

Edited by gto0188
  • 1 month later...
Posted

It ended up being the fuel tank pressure sensor. I was barely able to replace it by moving the driveshaft out of the way to get my hands up there and work by feel.

  • 5 years later...
Posted
Just an FYI for anyone having this P0446 code (or other EVAP code) issues. This GM system is super simple to diagnose when you can read the live EVAP data. Only 4 real problems (besides wire/corrosion damage) start with the easiest and check vent valve is opening/closing, then if purge valve is working, then move to the most difficult (but not hard) is tank pressure sensor reading correctly (gas cap off should be reading about 1.5 volts and -1.5 mmhg) if that is reading way off above or below and/or doesn’t change at all when you take gas cap off it’s likely the pressure sensor. If all good there then move to the physical charcoal canister/check it or vent filter not plugged up. Normally this code comes back to a vent valve or tank pressure sensor. 
 
Last pro tip, you can get to the fuel tank pressure sensor without dropping fuel tank or removing drive shaft, it’s on top of the fuel sender ring on gas tank just feel around follow the wiring harness. Jack up driver side to give a little more room. Take your time and it’s a 40 dollar OEM part, pull out old and put in new… I replaced everything and the last thing that fixed it, before I learned the entire system, was dang pressure sensor. Be smart, get a scanner and read the live EVAP data! Good luck you got this! 😎👍🏻

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...