Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I love auto 4wd during our Michigan winters. I’d rather have it over a level. But if there is a level that works with the auto 4wd I’d like to know. 

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, NonTypicalCPA said:

I love auto 4wd during our Michigan winters. I’d rather have it over a level. But if there is a level that works with the auto 4wd I’d like to know. 

Do you ever haul or tow anything with your truck?  I personally don't think the AT4s look that "unlevel" in stock form and the leveled ones look dorky with a case of beer in the back.  That combined with guys breaking ball joints by leveling the pre lifted trucks makes me want to keep it stock.

 

-Eli

  • Like 3
Posted
38 minutes ago, NonTypicalCPA said:

Most levels say you should not run in auto 4wd after install. 

Which is a huge red flag in my mind for CV angles.  Even though they look fine.

  • Like 4
Posted

^ This. Stacking leveling kits and having to be cautious about what to run would have me second guessing my choices. Sprinkle in the fact that a level truck looks nose high due to the body and any kind of weight in the back for the occasional haul would look like it's over loaded due to sag.

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted

I have zero intentions of levelling my truck but this is news to me and got me curious If some kits recommend not using auto 4wd, what about 4hi or 4lo? What does the auto have to do with anything? If you cant use any of the 4wd’s then why the **** would anyone get a 4wd truck?

  • Like 1
Posted

Any 4x4 truck without a straight axle in the front is going to run the risk of damaging and even snapping the cv’s. The more you weight you run (Bigger tires/wheels), and the higher the truck is lifted means you’re putting extra strain on components that weren’t designed for that by GM engineers. So yes it’s a risk, however most people who are leveling their trucks aren’t looking to do any serious off roads. These trucks are not built to go to Moab, we don’t even have a selectable locker, so I would assume 90% of guys buying 4 wheel drive trucks almost never use it. Lifting a truck is mostly for looks so cruising around on the highway and the occasional 4auto in wet or gravel roads shouldn’t be a problem. I would not recommend dropping to 4lo and trying to crawl over the rubicon...even with a stock truck.   

Posted

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.  

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, davidlewis1010 said:

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.  

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

 

The short answer to the OP's question is that any "level" kit for AT4/Trail boss may impact use of auto 4WD.  CV angles with level are to extreme in the front, no matter the level kit mfg.  the issue is when the truck moves into 4wd under some conditions the front diff suffers extreme torque and it can be severely damaged.  RL added a note to the SST kit after a few months, due to customer complaints of loud noises and a few customers who complained they lost their front diff's when using 4WD auto.  When you speak with knowlegable shops they all seem to agree that 4" of lift is the point of no return - so 2" added to AT4 + 2" more. 

 

Unfortunately the RL level kit, noted above has no mention of the "auto 4WD" function impact, but their SST kit they have the following note  "NOTE:  Use of Auto 4 HI feature not recommended",  the only difference is the rear block.  It is 1.75" level - so 3.75" overall, where SST states it is a 2" level (so 4" overall).  The upper control arms correct the angles for the upper ball joints, but do nothing for the CV axel angles. 

 

I had a 2019 AT4 Carbon Pro - I installed the RL SST kit - CV angles were not good - no auto 4WD.  I traded in for a 2020 AT4 Carbon Pro with trailer tow mirros, as I tow a lot and I did not want any issues up front.   Pictures below. 

 

For the 2020 I went with BDS 2.5" lift - which provides proper CV angles (better than AT4 from Factory).  I have the full program with Fox 2.5 DSC coilover shocks - so a $4,700 deal installed.   I love it, but it is a lot of money if you don't go offroad much and just want a level.  

 

If you want to use Auto 4WD, you will need a lift kit that lowers your front diff, to keep CV angles within OEM spec.  You can buy BDS or Zone 4" lift kit without the Fox shocks and save some $ - but you are still looking at $2,086 for BDS and $1,300 for zone (which is made by BDS).   But that is 6" over stock -so 4" over your AT4 OEM ride height - currently they do not offer the 2.5" lift kit without the fox coliovers (which is 4.5" vs stock 4" for AT4).  There are other mfg. of proper lift kits as well that can get you same outcome, as long as they have a diff lowering brackets in their lift kit.  Zone is the best overall value, for just the lift. 

 

RL SST: https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019.html

BDS:  https://bds-suspension.com/product?kid=749H

Zone:  https://zoneoffroad.com/products/4-in-ifs-suspension-lift-kit-2019-2020-chevy-trail-boss-gmc-at4?variant=33403092729944


Below are photos of my 2019 with RL SST kit and my 2020 with BDS 2.5" kit - you will note the CV angles are level on the BDS and are quite extreme on the RL (note boots).

 

There are no short cuts for AT4/Trailboss to do a proper level or lift.  Only other options other have tried is a shorter block in the rear for the level.  That is the cheapest option, but may not work the best. 

 

2019 AT4 - Ready Lift SST Kit - CV Angels - level ground 

IMG_8840.thumb.JPG.a07a57722c6527f062a5d102ac0e46c3.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift Kit CV angles - level ground 

1471550584_BDS-CVAngle-None!.thumb.JPG.9ef933d15ddb69ecc43a6ead0114e053.JPG

 

2019 AT4 Stock 

IMG_8517.thumb.JPG.a2cbf6a3ba0e0913542876db12358da7.JPG

 

2019 SST RL Level - dead level 

DP.thumb.JPG.6d7e9fb393fc50a3b92cff07f48b752e.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift - Fox shocks - a little rake 

1767178234_TruckFox2.thumb.JPG.c7935ae8998a5481cfcd49aa771ce791.JPG

Edited by Supercup
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Supercup said:

 

The short answer to the OP's question is that any "level" kit for AT4/Trail boss may impact use of auto 4WD.  CV angles with level are to extreme in the front, no matter the level kit mfg.  the issue is when the truck moves into 4wd under some conditions the front diff suffers extreme torque and it can be severely damaged.  RL added a note to the SST kit after a few months, due to customer complaints of loud noises and a few customers who complained they lost their front diff's when using 4WD auto.  When you speak with knowlegable shops they all seem to agree that 4" of lift is the point of no return - so 2" added to AT4 + 2" more. 

 

Unfortunately the RL level kit, noted above has no mention of the "auto 4WD" function impact, but their SST kit they have the following note  "NOTE:  Use of Auto 4 HI feature not recommended",  the only difference is the rear block.  It is 1.75" level - so 3.75" overall, where SST states it is a 2" level (so 4" overall).  The upper control arms correct the angles for the upper ball joints, but do nothing for the CV axel angles. 

 

I had a 2019 AT4 Carbon Pro - I installed the RL SST kit - CV angles were not good - no auto 4WD.  I traded in for a 2020 AT4 Carbon Pro with trailer tow mirros, as I tow a lot and I did not want any issues up front.   Pictures below. 

 

For the 2020 I went with BDS 2.5" lift - which provides proper CV angles (better than AT4 from Factory).  I have the full program with Fox 2.5 DSC coilover shocks - so a $4,700 deal installed.   I love it, but it is a lot of money if you don't go offroad much and just want a level.  

 

If you want to use Auto 4WD, you will need a lift kit that lowers your front diff, to keep CV angles within OEM spec.  You can buy BDS or Zone 4" lift kit without the Fox shocks and save some $ - but you are still looking at $2,086 for BDS and $1,300 for zone (which is made by BDS).   But that is 6" over stock -so 4" over your AT4 OEM ride height - currently they do not offer the 2.5" lift kit without the fox coliovers (which is 4.5" vs stock 4" for AT4).  There are other mfg. of proper lift kits as well that can get you same outcome, as long as they have a diff lowering brackets in their lift kit.  Zone is the best overall value, for just the lift. 

 

RL SST: https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019.html

BDS:  https://bds-suspension.com/product?kid=749H

Zone:  https://zoneoffroad.com/products/4-in-ifs-suspension-lift-kit-2019-2020-chevy-trail-boss-gmc-at4?variant=33403092729944


Below are photos of my 2019 with RL SST kit and my 2020 with BDS 2.5" kit - you will note the CV angles are level on the BDS and are quite extreme on the RL (note boots).

 

There are no short cuts for AT4/Trailboss to do a proper level or lift.  Only other options other have tried is a shorter block in the rear for the level.  That is the cheapest option, but may not work the best. 

 

2019 AT4 - Ready Lift SST Kit - CV Angels - level ground 

IMG_8840.thumb.JPG.a07a57722c6527f062a5d102ac0e46c3.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift Kit CV angles - level ground 

1471550584_BDS-CVAngle-None!.thumb.JPG.9ef933d15ddb69ecc43a6ead0114e053.JPG

 

2019 AT4 Stock 

IMG_8517.thumb.JPG.a2cbf6a3ba0e0913542876db12358da7.JPG

 

2019 SST RL Level - dead level 

DP.thumb.JPG.6d7e9fb393fc50a3b92cff07f48b752e.JPG

 

2020 AT4 BDS 2.5" Lift - Fox shocks - a little rake 

1767178234_TruckFox2.thumb.JPG.c7935ae8998a5481cfcd49aa771ce791.JPG

Did your 2019 use the stock upper control arms?  That angle doesn’t look good.  Your 2020 kit looks ideal, but it should for the cost. Here is a pic of my 2020 with the RL level kit with new upper control arms.  The CV angle is not severe like your 2019 was.  This kit didn’t come out until 2020, so I am curious if maybe you used something different.  This kit splits the spacers between the top and bottom of the coil over.  Putting a spacer on the bottom of the coil over moves the control arm further away while leaving the ball joint and cv angle somewhat unchanged.  ACF4572C-B2BF-4537-B20D-0E5428B20DE5.thumb.jpeg.727797e7aaa63a5989ae681c7b9d375e.jpegI agree that lowering the front diff is the correct way to go to correct the cv angles.  I must disagree with your comment that the upper control arm does not impact CV angles.  The longer arms push the top of the spindle outward to help center the lower ball joint.  This also changes the angle on the cv axle.  

Posted
2 hours ago, davidlewis1010 said:

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.   

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

More info here about the RL advisory to not use it..

 

Posted (edited)
On 10/25/2020 at 7:30 PM, davidlewis1010 said:

Did your 2019 use the stock upper control arms?  That angle doesn’t look good.  Your 2020 kit looks ideal, but it should for the cost. Here is a pic of my 2020 with the RL level kit with new upper control arms.  The CV angle is not severe like your 2019 was.  This kit didn’t come out until 2020, so I am curious if maybe you used something different.  This kit splits the spacers between the top and bottom of the coil over.  Putting a spacer on the bottom of the coil over moves the control arm further away while leaving the ball joint and cv angle somewhat unchanged.  ACF4572C-B2BF-4537-B20D-0E5428B20DE5.thumb.jpeg.727797e7aaa63a5989ae681c7b9d375e.jpegI agree that lowering the front diff is the correct way to go to correct the cv angles.  I must disagree with your comment that the upper control arm does not impact CV angles.  The longer arms push the top of the spindle outward to help center the lower ball joint.  This also changes the angle on the cv axle.  

 

2019 did have Ready Lift Upper control arms - however they are not "longer" per say - they just change the angles, to correct the geometry of the upper ball joint, to reduce the wear.  

 

Below is video from Ready lift that walks through their AT4/Trail Boss level kit and SST kit.    See minute 1:37 - 2:04, 3:55 - 4:20 and 5:20 - 5:40 to hear about control arms.  If you stop video at 4:22 you can see the control arms (stock and Ready lift) - if you measure from the bolt hole to the tip and see they are basically the same length.

 

I do agree  there are many after market control arms that are longer, but it does not appear to be the case here.   Also note the "thicker" end of the RL UCA, reduces tire clearance on the inside versus the stock UCA's - see photo below of clearance with stock 27/65/18's on a 18mm offset Method NV 18"x9" wheel.  That photo is my 2019 with RL SST kit installed.  With stock wheels, which are 26 mm offset, I could not get my finger in there - too close.   That is about 5/16's of an inch of clearance. 

 

IMG_8828.thumb.JPG.4eea0193c4acb8c3ede59614fa68c684.JPG  

 

LINK: 

 

Edited by Supercup
  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/25/2020 at 11:34 AM, davidlewis1010 said:

ReadyLIFT has a leveling kit specifically designed for the AT4/Trail Boss that comes with new upper control arms to allow for proper ball joint and C/V axle angle.  There is no note about not using Auto mode.  I have this kit, and have had no issues with it.  I do see the note about not using the auto mode in the ReadyLIFT 2.0” lift kit for the AT4/TrailBoss that uses the same front end components as the level kit.  It’s also in every other lift kit made by them.  I am curious if the reason has something to do with the raised center of gravity on the truck, and this is a way for them to cover themselves in the event of an accident.  

https://www.readylift.com/2-25-front-leveling-kit-w-control-arms-at4-trail-bossgm-1500-truck.html

Quote from ReadyLift in writing: "We don't suggest 4wd auto to be used " This was in reference to a list of questions I wrote them on the 1.75 AT4/Trail Boss level kit. That kit includes new UCAs. Congnito and BDS both told me same about their level kits. 

Edited by Mark Scannura
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,324 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...