Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Since September 15 we all have been. I post the following about twice a year at each change when this topic comes up: 
 
The difference between summer- and winter-blend gasoline involves the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) of the fuel. ... The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says conventional summer-blend gasoline contains 1.7 percent more energy than winter-blend gas, which is one reason why gas mileage is slightly better in the summer.
 

Winter gas accounts for a MAXIMUM of 1.7% of the mpg loss. 

Mostly correct but states that are more strict on air quality adjusts the dates. California and a few other extend the date on summer blend and have to use earlier because summer blend is cleaner and they want it used more.
I never notice much change on mpg so its not really a concern. Also I never have to deal with ethanol in the gas.


Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
13 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Biggest influence on mpg is your right foot

No one likes to hear that

But.....

:dunno:

I get 15-16mpg on a 9" lift with 37"s.

Take your foot off the firewall.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bash74 said:

Mostly correct but states that are more strict on air quality adjusts the dates. California and a few other extend the date on summer blend and have to use earlier because summer blend is cleaner and they want it used more.
I never notice much change on mpg so its not really a concern. Also I never have to deal with ethanol in the gas.


Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

The difference between summer and winter fuel is the RVP which is adjusted with butane. Winter gas gets more butane to raise the vapor pressure. Summer gas has less. You can google this or take my word for it as an FCC/ISOM unit operator for Chevron making your gas. (retired).

 

News travels slow and rumors die hard.  

 

https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/special/pdf/mtbe.pdf

 

This stuff is always changing. 

Posted
The difference between summer and winter fuel is the RVP which is adjusted with butane. Winter gas gets more butane to raise the vapor pressure. Summer gas has less. You can google this or take my word for it as an FCC/ISOM unit operator for Chevron making your gas. (retired).
 
News travels slow and rumors die hard.  
 
https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/special/pdf/mtbe.pdf
 
This stuff is always changing. 
You are very sensitive. I didn't say anything about the science. I said mostly because you said we are all on winter which is not true. California changes winter to summer 1 April and summer to winter 31 Oct. Arizona and Texas doesn't have a 15 September change over. This goes back to my original asking if the OP was already on winter.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted

If you were worried about gas mileage, why did you modify your truck with a lift and larger tires?

Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Since September 15 we all have been. I post the following about twice a year at each change when this topic comes up: 

 

The difference between summer- and winter-blend gasoline involves the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) of the fuel. ... The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says conventional summer-blend gasoline contains 1.7 percent more energy than winter-blend gas, which is one reason why gas mileage is slightly better in the summer.

 

Winter gas accounts for a MAXIMUM of 1.7% of the mpg loss. 

Grumpy, what are some of the other reasons that summer gas mileage is better? The internet says the 1.7% extra energy is only 1 of them. I can't find the rest.

 

I know you like data. Here's 370 tanks of gasoline charted over 7+ years in my old beater. Lifetime average economy of 28.47 mpg.

 

If the 1.7% is all of the difference, it should only vary about 0.5 mpg from winter to summer. but I can see a seasonal trend that looks more like 5 mpg difference.

 

Now don't think that can all be attributed to idling time: No remote start and I parked in an attached garage for all but 1 winter, so I rarely let it warm up for more than 30 seconds before driving. And majority of trips are probably 100 miles average, since most driving was for work. So winter warm up idlling time was only a tiny fraction of fuel usage. 

 

I'm curious what you think of this data.

Grand Am MPG.jpg

Posted
2 hours ago, aseibel said:

Grumpy, what are some of the other reasons that summer gas mileage is better? 

 

I'm curious what you think of this data.

Grand Am MPG.jpg

I think it looks just like mine :) Good job sir! 

 

Biggest drag on winter mpg is....ready for this? Viscous drag. In the summer, even on a cool night (shift workers) the 'initial' viscosity of motor oil is maybe 60-70 cSt. On an average winter day more like 5,000 cSt. You've seen this and know it well. Oil poured at room temperature v from the freezer. Now think what this is like for wheel bearing grease. Diff fluid, transmission fluid. Much of these fluids are surrounded in metal it also has to heat to operating temperature. Just over all larger temperature differences. Once fully to temperature the running viscosity is more in the range of 5 to 10 cSt. In the summer you can get it down to 3 to 5 cSt. 

 

Add to this that the fuel maps for lower AIT's are quite a bit richer. Winter air is denser. Tire pressures get away from people in a hurry running 3 to 5 psi low for weeks at at time. And yes, some remote starts. People tend to make their trips shorter which results in allot more cold starts and motors never reaching full heat. For some never.

 

Then there is also things like snow, water, slush and ice. All use more fuel than dry hot pavement. Did I miss anything?

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Bash74 said:

You are very sensitive. I didn't say anything about the science. I said mostly because you said we are all on winter which is not true. California changes winter to summer 1 April and summer to winter 31 Oct. Arizona and Texas doesn't have a 15 September change over. This goes back to my original asking if the OP was already on winter.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

Nah, hide like a rhino. Your post was below mine and I though you were asking me not the OP. My bad. My point wasn't about dates. It was about fuel blends and there effect on economy. I live now near Chicago. All sorts of strange fuel rules here. I don't often visit those five counties but when I have to buy fuel there it burns, economy wise, just like my local blends. Just like the E-0 I buy in Iowa as well. They are all very close in BTU content up to E-10. About UNL88 fuels things start to change.

 

Is there a difference? Yes but not one that is statistically different enough to make you notice. Thus the 1.7% comment. 

Posted
On 10/27/2020 at 6:51 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

Biggest drag on winter mpg is....ready for this? Viscous drag.

Your explanation makes plenty of sense. I still wonder one thing. Lets say I'm making a 100 mile trip, each way.

Its 32 degrees in my garage when I start it. All the fluids and moving parts are cold, yes? A couple minutes in I'm getting warm air blown inside. By 5 country miles the engine reaches normal temp. I don't know at what point the bearing grease warms up. But at some point don't all the moving parts reach "normal" operating temp again?

 

So out of my 100 mile trip, the beginning 10-20 miles or so may be highly inefficient. But the remaining 80 are relatively normal, wouldn't you say? In my work car, the majority of my trips were long distance, so none of this 5 minute drive while never warming up stuff. I checked my tire pressure every 2 weeks, so no large drop in pressure.

 

It's shocking to me that taking a trip in January and burning a whole tank of fuel in 1 day, only 0.5 of the MPG drop is due to the fuel and the other 4.5 drop is because of the resistance of cold parts/lube.

Posted
47 minutes ago, aseibel said:

Your explanation makes plenty of sense. I still wonder one thing. Lets say I'm making a 100 mile trip, each way.

Its 32 degrees in my garage when I start it. All the fluids and moving parts are cold, yes? A couple minutes in I'm getting warm air blown inside. By 5 country miles the engine reaches normal temp. I don't know at what point the bearing grease warms up. But at some point don't all the moving parts reach "normal" operating temp again?

 

So out of my 100 mile trip, the beginning 10-20 miles or so may be highly inefficient. But the remaining 80 are relatively normal, wouldn't you say? In my work car, the majority of my trips were long distance, so none of this 5 minute drive while never warming up stuff. I checked my tire pressure every 2 weeks, so no large drop in pressure.

 

It's shocking to me that taking a trip in January and burning a whole tank of fuel in 1 day, only 0.5 of the MPG drop is due to the fuel and the other 4.5 drop is because of the resistance of cold parts/lube.

Sad but true. 

 

It's a math thing.

 

I take ten test and score 100 on them. My average is 100. 

I score 100 on 8 test and don't show up for 2 my average is now 80

How many more test do I have to score 100 on to get back to just 90? Ten more perfect scores or 20 total test. 

95% requires a total of 40 test. 100% is impossible. 

 

I learned allot when I installed my Scan Gauge II. I put up water temperature, Oil temperature and transmission temperature them observer for a year logging miles to stabilize each. In the winter it is ridiculous how long it takes to reach operating temperature in the oils. In the summer my water is up to heat in 5 miles. In the winter about 7 miles. In the summer my oil is up to full temp in about 10 miles, in the winter 25 or more. The transmission which takes about 15-20 in the summer takes as long as an hour in the winter. Before I bypassed the trans stat and let some fluid be heated by the radiator it took 75 miles to reach 150 F and 100 miles to reach 190 F. 

Diff? Wheel bearings?

 

IF summer hot is running through water and cold is running through honey then winter cold is concrete. 

  

Posted
11 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Sad but true. 

IF summer hot is running through water and cold is running through honey then winter cold is concrete. 

Then I'm sure glad I have an insulated attached garage. Even on those -10 degree mornings outside, usually the vehicle temp is around 30+ inside the garage. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Straight from the EPA, boys(https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/coldweather.shtml):

Why is winter fuel economy lower?

Cold weather affects your vehicle in more ways than you might expect:

  • Engine and transmission friction increases in cold temperatures due to cold engine oil and other drive-line fluids.
  • It takes longer for your engine to reach its most fuel-efficient temperature. This affects shorter trips more, since your car spends more of your trip at less-than-optimal temperatures.
  • Heated seats, window defrosters, and heater fans use additional power.
  • Warming up your vehicle before you start your trip lowers your fuel economy—idling gets 0 miles per gallon.
  • Colder air is denser, increasing aerodynamic drag on your vehicle, especially at highway speeds.
  • Tire pressure decreases in colder temperatures, increasing rolling resistance.
  • Winter grades of gasoline can have slightly less energy per gallon than summer blends.
  • Battery performance decreases in cold weather, making it harder for your alternator to keep your battery charged. This also affects the performance of the regenerative braking system on hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and electric vehicles.

In severe winter weather, your mpg can drop even further.

  • Icy or snow-covered roads decrease your tires' grip on the road, wasting energy.
  • Safe driving speeds on slick roads can be much lower than normal, further reducing fuel economy, especially at speeds below 30 to 40 mph.
  • Using four-wheel drive uses more fuel.
Posted (edited)
On 10/27/2020 at 4:37 PM, aseibel said:

Grump

Grand Am MPG.jpg

image.png.17b03b7105225af6db3d946dda396c15.png

 

Fewer years, same pattern.

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Well....since the EPA said it 

:crackup:

 

Wait...didn't I just say al that? 

Oh, come on...  They're bound to have your best interests in mind once in a while.

 

The only one of these I somewhat disagree with is the tire pressure.  I keep mine in check (though more energy definitely goes into flexing the rubber.)  But then again, if my wife's car is any indication...

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,856 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...