Jump to content

Heavy Duty Front Spring for Travel Trailer?

ARM3

By ARM3
in 2020-2026 Silverado HD & Sierra HD

 Share

Recommended Posts

6.6HD Enthusiast

6.6HD

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, MTU Alum said:

Cranking the torsion bars doesn't change the spring rate, only the check height so that won't change your ride.

 

I'm not sure the model and tire you are running.  If you have a 18 or 20 inch tire, snow plow prep will bump up your front spring rate two steps (three on reg cabs) and you get the diesel front shock.  If you have 17 inch tires you get the same suspension changes but also about 10 to 15 psi tire pressure increase.  

 

I haven't rode any bilstein shocks before.  A shock can only do so much with higher spring rate.  The higher spring rate not allow you to use full length of travel in compression due to you not having enough mass for that spring rate.

 

I probably would look at a torsion bar change first.  You would have to realign vehicle after the tbar change.  This would lower your FGAWR to 4400 or 4800 lbs from 5600lbs as well.

 

#iworkforGM 

 

I have 18's.  Crew cab.  Any idea on part number for the torsion bars I would need?

 

Maybe I will just mount a couple hundred pounds in iron blocks under the front bumper!  LOL

Stand By Enthusiast

Stand By

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, 6.6HD said:

I have 18's.  Crew cab.  Any idea on part number for the torsion bars I would need?

 

Maybe I will just mount a couple hundred pounds in iron blocks under the front bumper!  LOL

Put a winch bumper on it. 

I have a gas crew cab with plow prep. Rides not as bad as I thought, but plan on bilsteins after a court priority add ons.

  • 2 months later...
Steph 6.6 HD gas Enthusiast

Steph 6.6 HD gas

Posted
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I also have the same front stiffness issue on my Chevy Crew 2020 HD 6.6 gas with plow prep. I don'plow.I only tow a 27' toy hauler. Dealer cant tell me what part number i would need to change them to a standard torsion rate. My right side torsion PN #84745487 and the torsion key PN #84634344. Not sure if the bump-stops  are different . mine are PN# 20781438 . I forgot the left side#. need to crawl back under tomorrow.

 

 

Any insight would help.

Steph

MidwestKevin New Member

MidwestKevin

Posted
Posted

Hello

I have the same 6.6 gas with snow plow prep. 21 HD Denali. Do we need to change the torsion bars and the springs?

Any idea on cost? Has anyone done it and did it make much different in the ride?

 

Thanks

MWK

GMC4Zee Enthusiast

GMC4Zee

Posted
Posted

Dam, let the salesman talk me into getting the camper/snow plow prep package and now I may regret that decision. I plan on going with fox 2.0 shocks but may have to look into the Cognito comfort torsion bars. I tow a 12K 5th wheel. Will have to see how it rides when I get delivery in 3 weeks. Getting a '21 GMC 3500 AT4.

 

MTU Alum Enthusiast

MTU Alum

Posted
Posted

You should only order the camper package with pickup campers.  You need the higher front GAWR for pickup campers and the higher spring rates for roll.  On diesels, the torsion bar only goes up one size whereas on gas trucks it's two to three sizes.

 

I wouldn't recommend cognito setup.  GM has five different torsion bar rates and there is no way you can replace with one rate like cognito does.  It will probably ride nice but, you could have some handling or roll issues due lack of spring rate.

 

#iworkforGM 

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
FLDawg Enthusiast

FLDawg

Posted
Posted

Does choosing Z71 suspension over over base Z85 suspension increase front spring rate or FGAWR?

Regards to a 2500hd, 2020+

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

No. Only the shocks are different.  The torsion springs for the truck and the FGAWR are set based on the basic truck configuration, then there are two options - heavy duty camper springs (400 lbs higher FGAWR), and plow pkg (400 to 1200 lbs higher FGAWR depending on base configuration). 
 

For my 3500 cclb srw gas, for example, base FGAWR is 5200. I ordered camper springs, which are 5600, and plow package for my truck would be 6000. After a year of driving it I have decided I don’t need the camper springs for my lightweight popup truck camper, which it turns out only adds 100 lbs of load to the front axle, so I just ordered the 5200 torsion bars to modify it back to the base configuration for a little better ride.  I’ll post on how the mod goes in a few weeks. I’m going to get the Autozone loaner torsion bar tool and try it this weekend to make sure it’s the right one for the new trucks. Reviews say it is the right one. 

  • Like 1
sheath Enthusiast

sheath

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've noticed with the VYU Option, when pulling the 5th wheel (14,300 lbs with about 2,400lbs on the pin) that the front end rides pretty high, and the steering is light / less responsive.  Thinking it is most likely higher than it would be with the standard suspension.   I'd venture to guess it would be even more pronounced with a hitch pull trailer, unless the weight distribution bars are cranked down tight.

Just something to consider. 

I'm adding a front hitch, and plan to carry some weight up there to help settle the front end when pulling the 5th wheel.

 

Truck is a CC/SB 3500HD Gas engine. 

Hope this info is helpful.

 

Truck-&-Trailer-Hooked-Up.jpg

Edited by sheath
add picture
  • 2 weeks later...
Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted
On 3/26/2021 at 4:01 PM, MidwestKevin said:

Hello

I have the same 6.6 gas with snow plow prep. 21 HD Denali. Do we need to change the torsion bars and the springs?

Any idea on cost? Has anyone done it and did it make much different in the ride?

 

Thanks

MWK

I just changed my torsion springs from the original heavy duty camper springs I ordered (5600 FGAWR) to the base springs for my model (5200 FGAWR).  I posted a detailed description of the job in the mods subforum. Bottom line it was surprisingly easy, took me 2.5 hours (now that I’ve done it once I could do it again in 90 minutes), and the two new springs cost about $520 shipped plus whatever tax applies.  Autozone loans the special tool you need. See my post for the tool number. 
 

The ride is noticeably a little better, but the big difference is when I go over speed bumps and other large dips and bumps. It’s definitely softer, which is what I wanted. I would imagine going from the 6000 FGAWR bars to the 5200 bars would be a very noticeable improvement in ride with no plow attached. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...