Jump to content

Autotrac transfer case vs regular

nick112288
 Share

Recommended Posts

nick112288 Enthusiast

nick112288

Posted
Posted

So I'm probably going to order me a 3500 LT here soon and I'm trying to figure out if paying for the autotrac transfer case is worth it. 

 

Is there any difference between the regular transfer case and autotrac other than 4 Auto? One stronger than the other?

 

Anyone really use 4 Auto? 

Bikemobile Enthusiast

Bikemobile

Posted
Posted

I dont know if there is a mechanical or strength difference. I am in the market for a 2020+ GM HD so I'm wondering the same thing. I have the auto4x4 in my 1500 Sierra and I use it all the time. Its really nice if you live in an area where road conditions vary. Colorado high country is a good example. 

Thankful Enthusiast

Thankful

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've had several 2500 and 3500 GM trucks since 2005.  Personally, I prefer the AutoTrac transfer case.  The 2020 GMC Sierra HD Denali that I currently own has it and it is the first 2500 I've owned that has it.  I have no information if it is more reliable or rugged than the regular four wheel drive transfer case, but I know that I don't like the "bucking" that occurs when turning the steering wheel when in four wheel drive with the old transfer case.

Edited by Thankful
Correct
Cosmic Charlie Enthusiast

Cosmic Charlie

Posted
Posted

I would bet strength wise they are equal

 

the newer versions offering AUTO are nice as stated for general driving in varying conditions with no front tires fighting each other on tight turns with somewhat snowy / less snowy roads, and having the option of full 4WD for constant snow plowing ...

 

I've had 3 HD's 2004/2011/2015 all with electric shift (all bought new & used by me for over 100,000 miles) and have never had a failure

 

I believe in AUTO mode the truck is just rear wheel drive and as rear slippage is sensed the fronts smoothly engage as needed - thats how my 2007 Avalanche worked - I liked it

 

30 years ago I'd say there were issues with the Electric, but now all mine have been flawless

 

some general info I found

 

https://tnttransfercase.com/general-motors-transfer-cases/

nick112288 Enthusiast

nick112288

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So I assume the transfer case internals are the same either way, it's just the Autotrac version has the ability to let that clutch pack slip? It's not like the regular version has a solid gear set that engages?

  • Like 1
unit Enthusiast

unit

Posted
Posted

One advantage of Autotrac is not having to worry about forgetting to take the truck out of 4WD.  Leaving the system on won't damage anything whereas leaving 4WD engaged could potentially snap and axle or damage the transfer case itself if driving on a hard, dry surface.  that's an extreme example but it does happen occasionally.

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)

Seems to be some confusion about the different transfer cases. 

 

The older transfer case with the floor shift.

The version with the knob controlled electronic shifter that has been available for a bunch of years now.

 

The 'autotrac' box, which is new on HD's starting in 2020, although 1500's have had an autotrac box for a number of years. 

Autotrac has the additional mode where the truck decides when it should engage the transfer case. 

 

These two have been in use for a number of years:

NQG    Transfer case, with floor-mounted shifter
NQF    Transfer case, electronic shift with rotary dial controls 

 

Starting in 2020 we have modified controls on NFQ, and NQH Autotrac has been added.   NQG Floor shifter gone. 

NQF    Transfer case, two-speed, electronic shift with push button controls
NQH       NEW!  Transfer case, two-speed active, electronic Autotrac with push button control
 

Edited by redwngr
  • Thanks 1
nick112288 Enthusiast

nick112288

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, redwngr said:

Seems to be some confusion about the different transfer cases. 

 

The older transfer case with the floor shift.

The version with the knob controlled electronic shifter that has been available for a bunch of years now.

 

The 'autotrac' box, which is new on HD's starting in 2020, although 1500's have had an autotrac box for a number of years. 

Autotrac has the additional mode where the truck decides when it should engage the transfer case. 

 

These two have been in use for a number of years:

NQG    Transfer case, with floor-mounted shifter
NQF    Transfer case, electronic shift with rotary dial controls 

 

Starting in 2020 we have modified controls on NFQ, and NQH Autotrac has been added.   NQG Floor shifter gone. 

NQF    Transfer case, two-speed, electronic shift with push button controls
NQH       NEW!  Transfer case, two-speed active, electronic Autotrac with push button control
 

No confusion here. I know the floor shift is gone.

 

All I'm trying to figure out is if the ONLY difference is the fact the Autotrac has the extra 4A setting along with the electric motor that can allow varying degrees of clutch pack engagement. 

 

I would assume they wouldn't use 2 different transfer cases. One with a solid gear hookup, ans one with clutch pack engagement 

nick112288 Enthusiast

nick112288

Posted
  • Author
Posted
50 minutes ago, redwngr said:

They are different transfer cases. 

 

 

Where are you finding this? Everything I'm finding essentially says the 2 transfer cases are the same, one simply has the capability to vary clutch pressure, therefore accomplishing 4A 

sabre364 Enthusiast

sabre364

Posted
Posted (edited)

https://gm-techlink.com/?p=11710

 

Welcome addition to the HD models.  I hope Ford and Dodge follow.  The 1/2 ton rams use the same 1500 GM autotrac tcase in some models.  I like the GM offers the autotrac historically even on the LT 1/2 tons vs Ford (late to the game, offer only on lariat+, and still using vacuum hubs?).

 

Should be reliable, assuming you're not plowing with it in 4auto, but fine for daily driving.

Edited by sabre364
redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted (edited)

GM has had the Autotrac version on the 1500's for a bunch of years.

It's new to the HDs for 2020. 

 

On current HD's, the LT and SLE are the only trims that can have either box.

Lower only get the NQF, higher only get the NQH

 

 

FWIW, the 1500's now have an autotrac box that doesn't have 4Lo as std on lower trims.

NP0    Transfer case, single speed, electronic Autotrac with push button control (4WD models only)

 

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • 4 years later...
Skiff Lowrey New Member

Skiff Lowrey

Posted
Posted

This thread is a few years old, but seems to be on topic for me.  I am looking at 2024/2025 Silvarado 1500 4x4. The 2spd transfer case option is a $200 upgrade. With this selectorI can chose 2 hi, 4hi, and 4lo. Where as the Auto has 4 hi setting and Auto that kicks in as it determines. More like an adaptive AWD, than a true 4wd. If someone could clear this up for me I would appreciate it. 

Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted

The auto has a clutch pack in it. When it is in auto, it holds at like 10 or 15% until rear wheel slip happens, then it engages. It's worth the money if ordering a truck. Most main roads are plowed and dry-ish and side streets are not in snowy city areas (like Flagstaff or east of the Rockies). Constantly switching in and out *could* be annoying if you live there. If you just visit like me, it's not a big deal. Push a button, done. I would have checked the box if I ordered my truck though. 

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted
On 1/6/2025 at 3:09 PM, Skiff Lowrey said:

This thread is a few years old, but seems to be on topic for me.  I am looking at 2024/2025 Silvarado 1500 4x4. The 2spd transfer case option is a $200 upgrade. With this selectorI can chose 2 hi, 4hi, and 4lo. Where as the Auto has 4 hi setting and Auto that kicks in as it determines. More like an adaptive AWD, than a true 4wd. If someone could clear this up for me I would appreciate it. 

Both the single speed and two speed transfer cases have the “auto” function as described above. Both have 4 hi, which is a true part time  4 wheel drive with no center differential or slippage function. The two speed transfer case also has 4 wheel drive low, or 4 Lo, which significantly changes the overall drive gear ratio to provide greater torque and speed control while driving on unpaved or slippery surfaces.  


To me it makes no sense not to get the two speed transfer case. It’s probably one of the only features that is worth 5 to 10 times what you paid for it at resale because many people will not even consider the truck if it doesn’t have 4 Lo.). It is essential for off roading and for gardening (stump pulling), and really nice to have for steep boat ramps.  Most people not off roading or using steep boat ramps rarely use it, but when you need it, you will be very glad you spent that $200. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SoCal Angler
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By SoCal Angler · Posted

      2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...