Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Everyone,

I am currently building a LS 408, Whipple Supercharged engine for my 2017 Silverad0 2500hd 6.0l. I will not tow heavy load very often, and the truck is my daily driver....just wanting to have some fun. Currently the 10.5 differentials are geared at 4.10, but with the future increase in engine power, I feel the 4.10 gears will be a bit much for take off, as it will rev to fast? I am going to install an Eaton Trutrac assembly in the rear, but wanted your EXPERT opinions on the gears? Advice appreciated.

 

 

Posted

Hi George,

 

This truck is already supercharged, I am building a 408 to go with it. It is tuned with HP Tuners.

 

Thanks

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I don't know if this will help, since my truck is not SC or built.  I think the one major flaw I can find is the first to second gear ratio in the trans.  I had my truck tuned, and I rod it around once in a while, but burn outs and launches kinda suck with this truck.  ( I know its not built for 1/8 mile or 1/4 mile runs, but its mine and I drive it the way I want.)  When it shifts outta first doing a burnout, it falls flat on its face.  I don't now if you'd have to open up the transmission and change that ratio, or my tuner needs to do more work.............   I think your 4.10 gears will be fine, it'll definitely be really quick off the lights!!

Posted

I’ve owned or built plenty of high performance vehicles. Even my stock 02 Avalanche will lay down rubber ifs that’s my desire. Family members of mine that drag raced their trucks either went 4WD or tire and wheel combo with slicks. My nephew daily drove a 10 second diesel truck in the early 2000s. 4WD street tires. My brother an 11 second little red truck he bought new. It has wide slicks with highly modified rear suspension. I learned to ease into the throttle for traction. With the TQ you’re running a more Highway gear will help with street traction with street tires. Will spin harder if you break traction. I always preferred the weak link be traction. Learning right foot driving rather than breaking parts with hard hook ups.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I just did gears, 4:88 new carrier and all the goodies.  I tow heavy and 4:10 didnt cut it.  Truck feels more responsive, not as heavy.  I would stick with the 4:10, more gear mean motor n trans work less.  Especilly when towing.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/20/2020 at 11:55 AM, cmysstailights said:

I just did gears, 4:88 new carrier and all the goodies.  I tow heavy and 4:10 didnt cut it.  Truck feels more responsive, not as heavy.  I would stick with the 4:10, more gear mean motor n trans work less.  Especilly when towing.

I am not towing but a couple more times, then my 5th wheel will be gone. I am building this for the street, daily driver. 

Posted
I am not towing but a couple more times, then my 5th wheel will be gone. I am building this for the street, daily driver. 
I havent towed yet, but i will say this. The truck feels lighter and more responsive. Still waiting on a retune for a month now.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I am very curious how the Whipple works for you? I am thinking about adding one to my 6.0.

 

Who did your tune? I have read that the tune from Whipple isn't the greatest and leaves the truck with surging issues. Did you have this problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...