Jump to content

Auto vs 2WD - MPG Question

JAshworth03
 Share

Recommended Posts

JAshworth03 Enthusiast

JAshworth03

Posted
Posted

All,

 

I can't remember what the final verdict was here.  If I am in "Auto" mode do I lose any MPG benefits?  I usually drive in 2WD mode, but with the roads getting a little worse with the weather, I was wondering if I should just leave it in Auto.

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

Yes, slightly less mpg with it in auto as the actuator on the front axle stays engaged.

 

 

 

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted

It’s probably not a huge difference but it stands to reason that when in “auto” there is more drag (and wear). The axle shafts and front driveshaft are spinning in auto, everything is engaged and waiting for torque from the transfer case clutch.

  • Like 2
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

.5mpg at best maybe?  As long as it sees no traction loss, only 5% of power will flow to the front end and the diff will be engaged so the rear wheels are still doing 95% of the driving work.  

Wiggums Senior Enthusiast

Wiggums

Posted
Posted

Like others say, wear and tear. I keep mine 2WD unless it's pouring outside.

  • Like 2
Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted

On a tangent, I leave it in 2WD unless I need 4.  Guess I'm old school but on my older trucks, I'd leave the hubs (manual) unlocked until the moment 2WD failed me.

 

That said, maybe I'll give "auto" a try this weekend when we're supposed to see some snow

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

On a tangent, I leave it in 2WD unless I need 4.  Guess I'm old school but on my older trucks, I'd leave the hubs (manual) unlocked until the moment 2WD failed me.

 

That said, maybe I'll give "auto" a try this weekend when we're supposed to see some snow

Auto is perfect for light snow/ sloppy roads with mixed snow cover. I rarely even use 4 high.
 

Auto does allow some brief slip at first and you can still spin a bit, but you’ll never really get stuck unless it’s some nasty stuff.


Auto 4x4 is also my default drag race / gap the car alongside of me at a stoplight mode. 

Duramaxsky Enthusiast

Duramaxsky

Posted
Posted
On a tangent, I leave it in 2WD unless I need 4.  Guess I'm old school but on my older trucks, I'd leave the hubs (manual) unlocked until the moment 2WD failed me.

 

That said, maybe I'll give "auto" a try this weekend when we're supposed to see some snow

I used to be like that. Then a semi changed lanes and ran me into the median. It was a nightmare getting to the hubs in the deep snow. Once I did I was able to back right out. I left then locked in winter weather after that until trucks with hubs went awry.

 

Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Auto 4x4 is also my default drag race / gap the car alongside of me at a stoplight mode. 

Why not toss in 4 High for that?  Seems like it'd be just a little more slippage and more wear on the clutch.  It's only like 3-4 seconds to swap between.

  • Like 1
OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

Why not toss in 4 High for that?  Seems like it'd be just a little more slippage and more wear on the clutch.  It's only like 3-4 seconds to swap between.

Eh, I’ve tested 0-60 a bunch in each mode. There’s no appreciable difference in times, get little-to-no wheel spin in either mode. For street fun especially, I just like auto. Can steer without fear, lol.

  • Like 1
Rob Mugs Enthusiast

Rob Mugs

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Eh, I’ve tested 0-60 a bunch in each mode. There’s no appreciable difference in times, get little-to-no wheel spin in either mode. For street fun especially, I just like auto. Can steer without fear, lol.

LOL.. touche

 

I have made the mistake of forgetting to turn it off and then get the dreaded... "noooo ... I don't wanna turn"

 

Took it up to GLD for a few bone-stock passes.  Hit a 14 flat but I think a ton of that is due to the speed cap at 98.  FWIW, I also brake torqued a few passes and then just stabbed it.  Stabbing knocked 2 tenths off

Edited by Rob Mugs
Duramaxsky Enthusiast

Duramaxsky

Posted
Posted
Eh, I’ve tested 0-60 a bunch in each mode. There’s no appreciable difference in times, get little-to-no wheel spin in either mode. For street fun especially, I just like auto. Can steer without fear, lol.
And with the clutch slip there is less chance of the front tires bending the tie rods and going full toe in. I know these trucks really don't have the power to do that easily but it can happen. It's common on Duramax powered trucks. Plus when crossing the slick crosswalk lines all the power going to the front end could break something. It's not as heavy duty as it's not intended to be the only one operating.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Duramaxsky Enthusiast

Duramaxsky

Posted
Posted
LOL.. touche
 
I have made the mistake of forgetting to turn it off and then get the dreaded... "noooo ... I don't wanna turn"
 
Took it up to GLD for a few bone-stock passes.  Hit a 14 flat but I think a ton of that is due to the speed cap at 98.  FWIW, I also brake torqued a few passes and then just stabbed it.  Stabbing knocked 2 tenths off
I was crossing the mountains in Southern Oregon and Northern California a few years ago. It was snowing hard. I was towing my travel trailer with my Duramax. The CHP chain enforcement check point made me chain up the trailer. Not the truck because it's 4WD. Just the trailer. Even though it has BF Goodrich all terrain TAs on it. I was not happy about it. When I stopped to take them off I forgot to take it out of 4WD. I didn't notice it until I got to LA. It was jumping trying to turn backing into the RV spot. As best I can tell it didn't hurt anything. Mostly freeway and it was raining hard the whole time.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

GMP Enthusiast

GMP

Posted
Posted

Even in auto front diff is still engaged. Will wear parts eventually. Brother in law left his in auto for two years blew out his front diff. Only use when needed. 

BigMick2023 Enthusiast

BigMick2023

Posted
Posted

A lot of cars have full time AWD, so why is it such a wear item on this truck to leave it in Auto (AWD)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,640 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...