Jump to content

Rear differential fill plug

Aaron, not A-A-Ron
 Share

Recommended Posts

Aaron, not A-A-Ron Enthusiast

Aaron, not A-A-Ron

Posted
Posted

I'm trying to replace the fluid in the rear differential of my 2003 suburban.  Before I started removing the cover I tried to get the fill plug off first.  Of course it stripped, even after scraping the rust and using lots of PB Blaster.  I eventually got it out, but now I could really use a replacement fill plug.  Does anyone have the part number or know of a plug that will fit?  This seems to be a common problem, but I can't find the part anywhere online.  I guess I could reuse the rounded plug...one last time...

txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted

I've seen them on Rockauto before. Any local auto parts store will have them for sure

Aaron, not A-A-Ron Enthusiast

Aaron, not A-A-Ron

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cant find it, specifically, on Rock Auto.  Just the drain plug for ones equipped with one, mine isn't.  Unless the drain and fill plugs are the same size, they certainly dont look the same.  The drain plug has the hex head, and the fill plug has the recessed 3/8" socket head

garagerog Enthusiast

garagerog

Posted
Posted

Aaron, not for sure on yours, but on at least the older GM differentials the fill plug was NPT, 3/4" was a common size. You could try and match it up at any hardware store, the recessed plug style may be hard to find, most NPT plugs have a square head.

  • Thanks 1
garagerog Enthusiast

garagerog

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Aaron, not A-A-Ron said:

garagerog, Would I have to worry screwing it in to far?  I wouldn't think so, but making assumptions was worked out so well for me...:)

Shouldn't be a problem, a little anti-seize dope on the threads should make removal the next time much easier.

txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Aaron, not A-A-Ron said:

Advance, Auto Zone, and AC delco websites were no help either.

If you're trying to find them through their website, you're probably wasting your time. Go to the store. They should have the in the "HELP" line. I've gotten them there and NAPA before with no issues. Or as mentioned just match it up at the hardware store. Square head isn't a problem

  • Thanks 1
Aaron, not A-A-Ron Enthusiast

Aaron, not A-A-Ron

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the 'HELP' suggestion!  Forgot about that one.  With Covid, going to stores in suburbia can be challenging.  Better grab my mask.

28 minutes ago, txab said:

If you're trying to find them through their website, you're probably wasting your time. Go to the store. They should have the in the "HELP" line. I've gotten them there and NAPA before with no issues. Or as mentioned just match it up at the hardware store. Square head isn't a problem

 

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted (edited)

I has been said several times. These are just standard pipe plugs and nothing special.  Any well stocked hardware store should have them.

 

Finding them at GM parts look-ups can be difficult because won't be listed in a regular parts guide. Fasteners etc are what are referred to as standard parts.  I dare say that AC Delco shown probably fits all from the 1950's up. 

Edited by elcamino
BlaineBug Enthusiast

BlaineBug

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, elcamino said:

I has been said several times. These are just standard pipe plugs and nothing special.  Any well stocked hardware store should have them.

 

Finding them at GM parts look-ups can be difficult because won't be listed in a regular parts guide. Fasteners etc are what are referred to as standard parts.  I dare say that AC Delco shown probably fits all from the 1950's up. 

They do have a magnet on them I believe.  The fill plug for the rear differential in my 2019 does at the very least (no drain plug as you're supposed to remove the cover.)  The front differential also has a magnet on the drain plug, but not on the fill plug, since the front differential has 2 plugs.

If you want to know for sure, the dealer may be your best bet.  I can't imagine it costs more than $15.

Edited by BlaineBug
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Aaron, not A-A-Ron said:

I'm trying to replace the fluid in the rear differential of my 2003 suburban.  Before I started removing the cover I tried to get the fill plug off first.  Of course it stripped, even after scraping the rust and using lots of PB Blaster.  I eventually got it out, but now I could really use a replacement fill plug.  Does anyone have the part number or know of a plug that will fit?  This seems to be a common problem, but I can't find the part anywhere online.  I guess I could reuse the rounded plug...one last time...

 

For a 1500 Suburban, GM# 444788.  1/2-14 thread, 39/64" long.  

 

For a 2500 Suburban with the 6.0 and 9.5" axle, GM# 93439312.  1/2-14 thread, 39/64" long.  

 

For a 2500 Suburban with the 8.1 and 10.5" axle, GM# 93439312.  1/2-14 thread, 39/64" long.  

 

Quadrasteer fill plug is discontinued, no specs on size/threads provided from GM.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...