Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello. 

 

Deactivate AFM will cause problems in the future?   I am using AutoSync.   Please let me know your experiences.

Edited by Darthmalo
Posted
2 hours ago, Darthmalo said:

Hello. 

 

Deactivate AFM will cause problems in the future.  I am using AutoSync.   Please let me know your experiences.

Darthmalo...why do you say that deactivation AFM will cause problems in the future? Can you direct me to that source info so I can read it? What is "Autosync"? I did a search and can't find anything related to AFM deactivate.

Posted
3 hours ago, rav3 said:

Darthmalo...why do you say that deactivation AFM will cause problems in the future? Can you direct me to that source info so I can read it? What is "Autosync"? I did a search and can't find anything related to AFM deactivate.

Hello.  I want to disable the AFM.  The Autosync is a programmer offer by White Automotive & Media:  AutoSync Programmer / Multifunction Tool (Tool Only) - White Automotive & Media Services (whiteautoandmedia.com).  I have this programmer and i been using the disable AFM feature for a week and I like it.  I just want to make sure that will not cause future problems because AFM is disable.

 I am thinking to get a Diablo Predator 2 tune.

Posted

Got yah....I see the unit you decided on, AutoSync, in your link. looks like you can do more things that just disable AFM. Cool.

 

However, unless I miss read your1st post, you said "Deactivate AFM will cause problems in the future." I read this as a statement & not a question. Could you clarify for me what problem will be caused by deactivate AFM that you stated? I just wanted to know what problems you found by doing this. I have been using the Range AFM disabler for about 6 months on my '17 Silverado 5.3L and have not seen any issue to date BUT if there's an issue that your aware of, please let me know what it is.

 

OR were you asking the forum: IS THERE PROBLEMS WITH DEACTIVATING AFM IN THE FUTURE?

Posted
11 minutes ago, rav3 said:

Got yah....I see the unit you decided on, AutoSync, in your link. looks like you can do more things that just disable AFM. Cool.

 

However, unless I miss read your1st post, you said "Deactivate AFM will cause problems in the future." I read this as a statement & not a question. Could you clarify for me what problem will be caused by deactivate AFM that you stated? I just wanted to know what problems you found by doing this. I have been using the Range AFM disabler for about 6 months on my '17 Silverado 5.3L and have not seen any issue to date BUT if there's an issue that your aware of, please let me know what it is.

 

OR were you asking the forum: IS THERE PROBLEMS WITH DEACTIVATING AFM IN THE FUTURE?

ok.  Sorry for the confusion.  I forgot to put the question mark.  Yes.  I want to know if will cause any problems in the future?.

 

Yes.  the AutoSync is a very cool tool.  This is the fist time that i done this.  I want to buy a Diablo Tune to delete the AFM for my silverado and my wife Suburban

Posted

Ok, now I understand. I'm old & hard headed. As mentioned above, I've been using the Range AFM disabler for about 6 months & have not had any issues. I've watched several video's that showed what the problem is when the AFM goes bad, where the lifter actuator can jam due to a burr that it can create when actuated repeatedly. My thinking is if disabled, that issue then would not be an issue. For that reason along is why I disabled mine. Not sure about the cam wear or life of the high pressure valley pan. My thinking is if the AFM is disabled the high pressure valley pan (VLOM) system does not operate, so it wouldn't wear out as soon. This may be a crazy assumption on my part. IIRC, the Range unit tricks the AFM to believe that there's a load on the engine all the time and so it just doesn't activate.

 

I'm sure other's will chime in here & offer more information. Here's a couple video's on AFM.

 

 Active Fuel Management | ACDelco AFM Lifters

 

Lifter Release Trick Collapsed Lifter AFM DOD GM Chevrolet Lifter Noise, Engine Rattle

Posted

Mines been off since 200 miles no issues. If it makes you feel better just turn it on once a year and drive around for a day.

Posted
2 hours ago, Lsgun1 said:

Mines been off since 200 miles no issues. If it makes you feel better just turn it on once a year and drive around for a day.

Do you have a tune?  or a device ?

Posted
21 hours ago, Darthmalo said:

Do you have a tune?  or a device ?

I have a range device

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...