Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Purchased this CarlinKit dongle for about $100 on Amazon -- https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B091YWGY2T/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o08_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

Took only minutes to install, used some two-sided tape to mount it in the center console.  Works very well on 2019 Sierra AT4.  Theres a few seconds of delay as it starts connects to the head unit and launches CarPlay.  Steering wheel, etc controls work.  Long press on the voice control gets you Siri.  Or use an iWatch. "Navigate to the One Warriors Way" and you are off to the game. If I could disable everything else and just have this by default it would be a huge win... Anyone know how to do that?

 

<RANT>Don't understand why GMC would release a vehicle with a wireless charger but no wireless CarPlay. To add insult to injury they actually have al the components, its clear that they just actively chose not to make it available. The native headhunt software is crap from a usability perspective -- I'm a SW engineer and I gave up after 30 minutes of messing with configs, users, etc.  Moreover the maps are all old (and crap). The truck actually can't find One Warriors Way on its own, nor could OnStar download the address to the truck. (So much for impressing the wife!) From a car electronics perspective they are over 20 years behind competitors such as Tesla. Love my truck, just wish they would give up on the OEM head units and default to CarPlay / Android Auto. </RANT>

CarLinKit.jpg

Posted

I prefer the head units over Android Auto.  Reason being, I like listening to the music on my phone.  I currently have about 2,100 songs, and that list is constantly growing.  I use the Samsung Music app because the Google Music app sucks.  The head unit in conjunction with my phone via Bluetooth plays my music flawlessly. 

 

However, I do agree about the maps being outdated.  The street I live on has existed for about 50-60 years.  I can put my address into the navigation, and it finds it with no problem.  However, every time I turn onto my street I get some audible notification that I'm driving in an area with no designated roads and to drive carefully.  Granted, I know the area well, and don't need to use nav long before I get to my neighborhood.  It's just a big circle with a grassy island in the middle.  I just fail to cancel nav.  GM does need to upgrade its game in the Infotainment department.  I think GM struggles with how since there are so many varied opinions on this. 

Posted

 

On 6/20/2021 at 3:17 PM, TomCarbonPro said:

<RANT>Don't understand why GMC would release a vehicle with a wireless charger but no wireless CarPlay. To add insult to injury they actually have al the components, its clear that they just actively chose not to make it available. 

 

 

Unfortunately that's not true.  The hardware for the wireless options is different.  You can purchase it through here:

https://www.whiteautoandmedia.com/product/silverado-sierra-wireless-car-play-android-auto-navigation-and-hd-radio-upgrade/

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Rob Mugs said:

 

 

Unfortunately that's not true.  The hardware for the wireless options is different.  You can purchase it through here:

https://www.whiteautoandmedia.com/product/silverado-sierra-wireless-car-play-android-auto-navigation-and-hd-radio-upgrade/

 

 

Not True for 2019 trucks, their solution doesn't work, only for 20 and up trucks

Posted
6 minutes ago, eppieguy said:

Not True for 2019 trucks, their solution doesn't work, only for 20 and up trucks

It works for 2019's with out the UV2 surround vision just not with the 360 cameras unfortunately. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, GTPprix said:

It works for 2019's with out the UV2 surround vision just not with the 360 cameras unfortunately. 

Ahhhh....., thats the difference, okiedokie, understood.

Posted
35 minutes ago, GTPprix said:

It works for 2019's with out the UV2 surround vision just not with the 360 cameras unfortunately. 

Beat me to it 😉

  • Like 1
Posted

Damn 360 camera, what was I thinking? LOL

Posted
1 hour ago, eppieguy said:

Damn 360 camera, what was I thinking? LOL

You were thinking the 360 cameras are amazing when driving a tank size vehicle! :D 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GTPprix said:

You were thinking the 360 cameras are amazing when driving a tank size vehicle! :D 

A lot of truth in that statement!

Posted

I used the Carplay2air module. Was 130 on their website. For some reason it “looked” better than amazon version. It came from over seas, China most likely. Had it in less than 2 weeks. It works perfect on my 2021 Trailboss custom. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I bought this for my 2019 HC and it works flawlessly! It takes maybe 20 seconds to connect, about the same time as it takes to connect your phone to your truck when you start it and the Carplay icon lights up on the infotainment screen and your set, I'm super happy so far with how well it works. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...