Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was wondering if my 2016 Silverado has a rev limiter? If so, does it apply when in manual. Someone asked me recently and I had no clue, so I am just curious now. Thanks!

Posted
1 hour ago, Ge0rge said:

I was wondering if my 2016 Silverado has a rev limiter? If so, does it apply when in manual. Someone asked me recently and I had no clue, so I am just curious now. Thanks!

 

Yep you do. Probably at 6000 is my guess though I'm not too familiar with the 5.3. You're welcome to try it out :) it's quite dramatic when it hits because it cuts fuel not just spark like some limiters. You won't hurt anything by hitting it. 

Posted

So does this happen even when in Manual Mode? I know previously I was in M1 and didn't realize and the tach was pretty high. Luckily I realized it in short order but it definitely raised an eyebrow, lol. Thanks for answering, much appreciated. 

Posted

Yep. There's something in the the truck-based OS that prevents it from auto-shifting on the 1-2 when in manual mode. I've tried and tried to change that via HP Tuners with no success.

 

Other vehicles I've driven just automatically shift for you even in manual mode. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, lucas287 said:

Yep. There's something in the the truck-based OS that prevents it from auto-shifting on the 1-2 when in manual mode. I've tried and tried to change that via HP Tuners with no success.

 

Other vehicles I've driven just automatically shift for you even in manual mode. 

So if I understand properly, it won't auto shift but it will still rev limit and perform the safety functions to prevent damage? Interesting...

 

My other car when in manual mode is all on the user doing what is necessary. 

Posted

That's correct. It'll just hit the limiter and fall flat on it's face until you do something about it. 

Posted

Yea there is two of them.  There is a limiter when in park to about 3500rpm-4000rpm.  Once you are moving, the engine's actual limit is 5800rpm for the 5.3 truck engine, 6000rpm for the 6.2 truck engine.  

Posted

The time I did it I was moving. Was in a loud construction zone in slow n go traffic. I noticed my gas pedal felt odd, looked down and the tach was at 6k. I quickly got off gas and shifted into drive when I realized. I obviously shifted it one click down to far when putting it in gear. Wish there was a way to not go into manual so easily. But at least the truck has safe guards. 

Posted (edited)

Manual mode will automatically shift for you, but you do have to select the highest gear you want to use (before/during driving doesn't matter). Its great for downshifting when towing/hauling, and aggressive driving. Say your cruising in high gear, drop it into manual (foot on/off gas doesn't matter) and it will downshift to 6th. And it won't go back into 7 or 8 unless you manually select/up-shift to 7 or 8. Keeps the revs higher (over 2000rpm), where you really feel the 6.2 start to wind up.

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
On 7/15/2021 at 10:58 AM, newdude said:

Yea there is two of them.  There is a limiter when in park to about 3500rpm-4000rpm.  Once you are moving, the engine's actual limit is 5800rpm for the 5.3 truck engine, 6000rpm for the 6.2 truck engine.  

And 6600rpm when the identical long block is installed into a corvette

Posted
On 7/15/2021 at 1:45 PM, Ge0rge said:

The time I did it I was moving. Was in a loud construction zone in slow n go traffic. I noticed my gas pedal felt odd, looked down and the tach was at 6k. I quickly got off gas and shifted into drive when I realized. I obviously shifted it one click down to far when putting it in gear. Wish there was a way to not go into manual so easily. But at least the truck has safe guards. 

Yeah right dude, you were blasting music, its ok i’ve done it before too.

Posted

It has been like this a while, that is why there is no actual "red line" on the tach, just numbers.

All computer controlled. 

Posted
22 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

And 6600rpm when the identical long block is installed into a corvette

 

And a camaro, or any other vehicle for that matter. Depending on tuning and modifications. 

 

Really?

Posted
9 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

And a camaro, or any other vehicle for that matter. Depending on tuning and modifications. 

 

Really?

Well it’s good info to know when you drive a vehicle with a 6k rpm redline and the identical motor in another vehicle goes to 6600rpm.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 549 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...