Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello All, 

 

I have a 2018 Silverado with the 5.3, so far I have done these "mods"

 

AFE power momentum GT cold air intake.

Borla Dual exhaust

Replaced the L83 throttle body and Intake manifold with the L86 (non ported)

 

Have a nice increase in power, I'm thinking about headers now.

 

I've heard a lot about the long tube headers I'm thinking about going all in with the long tube "stainless works", this will require a tune and about $4k total

 

On the flip side I'm thinking of Equal length shorty headers to cut down on some costs and eliminate the need for a tune...?

 

My question is, if I were to get the long tube headers, how does it work with the cats? Is it better to get Cats or no cats? Do I have a choice?

 

Also, If I were to get the shortys, what brands do you suggest? Would it be necessary for a tune with only shortys?

 

Thanks in advance!

CAI and TB and IM.jpg

Edited by Ryansal
Posted (edited)

I recently removed those two hoses going to the valve cover breather ports, it is a source of oil injestion into the motor. so what i did was order a set of 5/8" breathers from Uni off Amazon. been running great so far and there is no potential for unmetered air to get past the MAF sensor to mess up your AFR

 

dont waste your time with headers until you get the whole truck situated , i suggest get the transmission tuned first.. once you find a reliable safe tuner then start into the motor

Edited by pokismoki
Posted

Shorty headers are complete waste of money, don't even bother thinking about those. The stock exhaust manifolds do just as good as those do.

 

If you go with long tube you will want cat converters. Otherwise the exhaust is going to stupid load, drone and rasp like crazy. You'd have to add in more resonators to tame it down. You may even need/want another resonator even with long tubes that have cats.

 

American Racing headers also make great quality stuff. $4,000 for headers and tune sounds crazy to me.

 

ARH headers with cats is $1,900ish. SW's are similar around $2,000.

 

The horsepower per dollar spent for expensive headers just didn't make sense to me, so I never went that route. I did E85 instead because it cost me $100 and I do the tuning myself.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
17 hours ago, pokismoki said:

I recently removed those two hoses going to the valve cover breather ports, it is a source of oil injestion into the motor. so what i did was order a set of 5/8" breathers from Uni off Amazon. been running great so far and there is no potential for unmetered air to get past the MAF sensor to mess up your AFR

 

dont waste your time with headers until you get the whole truck situated , i suggest get the transmission tuned first.. once you find a reliable safe tuner then start into the motor

 

I see so the oil is coming in from the Cold air intake to the motor, So put the breathers on the valve cover ports.  What about the hoses coming off of the CAI, do I cap those off? Thank you

Posted
17 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Shorty headers are complete waste of money, don't even bother thinking about those. The stock exhaust manifolds do just as good as those do.

 

If you go with long tube you will want cat converters. Otherwise the exhaust is going to stupid load, drone and rasp like crazy. You'd have to add in more resonators to tame it down. You may even need/want another resonator even with long tubes that have cats.

 

American Racing headers also make great quality stuff. $4,000 for headers and tune sounds crazy to me.

 

ARH headers with cats is $1,900ish. SW's are similar around $2,000.

 

The horsepower per dollar spent for expensive headers just didn't make sense to me, so I never went that route. I did E85 instead because it cost me $100 and I do the tuning myself.

 

 

I appreciate the advice, I've been hearing that shortys don't do a ton and the noise factor can be a problem with longs. 

 

They are telling me the long tube stainless works headers are about $2000, with $850 for a tune and dyno and $1000 for labor.

 

What is E85?

 

Would you suggest I do the tune myself, what product would you recommend?  Thanks for the help!

Posted
1 hour ago, Ryansal said:

I appreciate the advice, I've been hearing that shortys don't do a ton and the noise factor can be a problem with longs. 

 

They are telling me the long tube stainless works headers are about $2000, with $850 for a tune and dyno and $1000 for labor.

 

What is E85?

 

Would you suggest I do the tune myself, what product would you recommend?  Thanks for the help!

E85 is ethanol fuel instead of just gasoline.  See if your car is setup to run on it first.

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ryansal said:

 

I see so the oil is coming in from the Cold air intake to the motor, So put the breathers on the valve cover ports.  What about the hoses coming off of the CAI, do I cap those off? Thank you

yeah autozone sells 5/8" water heater caps

 

just do E85, activate the tables for it and turn on Power enrichment about 60% throttle, this may be all the power you'll really need

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pokismoki said:

yeah autozone sells 5/8" water heater caps

 

just do E85, activate the tables for it and turn on Power enrichment about 60% throttle, this may be all the power you'll really need

Thanks about the water heater caps, have no clue about turning on the tables and power enrichment

Posted

If you don't really know anything about tuning, no I do not suggest you learn on this truck. It's very involved on vehicles like this. If you don't have E85 fuel locally at your fuel stations, then it's likely not something I would suggest doing either.

 

If the truck doesn't even have a tune on it right now, I would do that before doing anything else. A good tune by someone that knows what they are doing will surely wake that truck up and make it drive a whole lot better.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

If you don't really know anything about tuning, no I do not suggest you learn on this truck. It's very involved on vehicles like this. If you don't have E85 fuel locally at your fuel stations, then it's likely not something I would suggest doing either.

 

If the truck doesn't even have a tune on it right now, I would do that before doing anything else. A good tune by someone that knows what they are doing will surely wake that truck up and make it drive a whole lot better.

 

 

I appreciate the advice!, I think i'm going with some american racing long tube headers (with cats) and a calibration ( 1 guy said he does it "on the road" as trucks don't fit well on the dyno), the other guy said he does a full tune with the dyno, ??     thanks again

Posted (edited)

before you spend money on a dyno tune, install the Kateck 175 thermostat, to reduce KR when under load, have them set the fans to about 190 F, i feel stock is way too hot,  oh and don't increase the top speed, the driveline needs upgrading to go past 100mph

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have texas speed long tubes with high flow cats now . Would highly recommend and I would suggest wrapping the headers also. Get the L86 intake manifold, direct swap. I have that also. 
 

tune with blackbear performance. Great tuners over there. 
 

fyi, if you go longtubes with or without cats , it will be very loud unless you a quiet/mild catback. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,770
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Paul8556
    Newest Member
    Paul8556
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 596 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...