Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can you do that, yes. But is it saving you anything by doing that, no it's not. It puts wear on the transmission as well.

 

Vehicles for the past 25+ years or more have had a thing called deceleration fuel cut off. When your foot if off the throttle and you are coasting to a stop or coasting down a large hill, all of the fuel injectors turn off completely.

 

You can even watch this on your dash if you have that feature. Watch your instant fuel mileage in the cluster, when it pegs the gauge out to 99 MPG, there is no fueling being used at all because the computer has turned off the injectors.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Pay attention to CamGTP, he’s 100% correct.

You will actually burn more fuel by dropping it into neutral as deceleration fuel cutoff only works when the vehicle is in Drive or L (as the wheels can’t force the engine to turn in N, so it has to burn to stay on)

Posted

Oh, as an FYI, even without deceleration fuel cutoff, pushing into N doesn’t save fuel coasting. You would have the engine getting idle throttle either way, which is the same fuel burn.

All pushing into N on a downhill does is cost additional brake wear, because you lose a small amount of grade braking from having the wheels drive the engine, so you need to use more brake to maintain speed.

Posted

Right Peter, changing from D to N will let me go forward and far without any acceleration of the motor, and then I think that I will save gas because I can go more far without accelerate the car, and there is my concern related to the transmission because some people told me that this operation can damage the transmission due to the oil pump inside the transmission

Posted

The transmission oil pump is always spinning if the engine is running. The flex plate and torque converter are always connected.

 

Seems like a hassle to try and get every last mile per gallon, the minimal savings isn't worth it to me. Drive slower if you want better fuel mileage.

Posted

The idea of possibility saving 1 cent a year is not worth it. You driving the wrong vehicle... The money you put into gas along is enough to pay for a car payment. 

 

The best way to save gas in a Silverado is to not drive a Silverado. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Azner Garcia Granado said:

Right Peter, changing from D to N will let me go forward and far without any acceleration of the motor, and then I think that I will save gas because I can go more far without accelerate the car, and there is my concern related to the transmission because some people told me that this operation can damage the transmission due to the oil pump inside the transmission

Leave it in gear, you'll need the engine braking if some knucklehead stops down the hill in front of you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't know how far back vehicles had hour meters, be it driver accessible or diag accessible but was wondering if there was any rule of thumb your shop came up with in regards to an hour limit on engine oil regardless of the miles on the oil.    I know with construction or farm equipment its almost always based on engine hours for maintenance scheduling as no other metric really applies other than a seasonal time limit that one self imposes on items like engine oil.  
    • I'm not sure what to say on that mess but I will say that is an odd thing for that mechanic to speculate on as per assuming its been run out of oil a few times as the odds of that engine having instead piled up with a complete seizure would be very high if such events had actually taken place. However there is nothing saying that the oil has ever been changed although once again, what filter was on that engine as that would tell part of the story if its possible to figure out if its a factory installed filter or not. Too many items unknown and a lot of speculation, but regardless of that its one fubared mess that is mind boggling to see for a vehicle that new and its hard to imagine how it ever made it that far in life looking at the top of the engine.    His scanners, I've watched him before here and there and I'd have to say if I recall correctly that some of his scanning equipment is one or two steps up from a child's Exo Sketch 😋
    • I agree. That`s a LOT of sludge for 12,000 miles. I tossed that out here since this is an OCI thread. There`s tons of people here that do not post.   I used to work on a city fleet. That includes police cars and fire trucks. Lesson is, not to only use the odo for oci. A police car has a ton of hours on the engine for the miles it shows. And, not just idling, directing traffic. They beat on these things.   Course, since it is a Kia, they were gonna use the "100,000 mile warranty" for their OCI.😉
    • CLASS ACTION SUITS?  Does anyone know if there is already a class action suit for the paint - which was to have been fixed, changed in after the 2020 GM vehicles?  Does it look like this?    Just started 3 weeks ago - No help from GM as of yet - Dealer will not assist in speaking with GM on my behalf. Confirmed it is the paint they use along with the way the put it on that causes it to fail.  Clearly a Manufacturer's Defect. 
    • That dog don't hunt. 😏   First, a 2025 with 12K on the clock AND idled for a year nonstop is false on it's face; this is 2026. You can do one or the other but not both.    Second, ENGINE HOURS are absolutely available. The rest is third grade math. Micky Mouse scanner he got out of a box of Cracker Jacks OR an ID10T error.    Third, if they ran it out of oil "Several times" that motor is boned on the first hit.    Does this guy think piling higher makes it stink less? 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...