Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 12/4/2021 at 12:38 PM, voided3 said:

I agree it should just be given to all owners of the '21 model year trucks, though. I believe Hyundai did a similar engine warranty extension on certain years of their 2.4 Theta II I-4 engines as they had block casting/crank bearing issues on those, for example (though Hyundai has a more generous 10 year, 100,000 mile powertrain warranty to begin with).

 

Hyundai denied warranty coverage for years and thousands of people were stuck with the bill on Theta II engine failures. Maybe they recently began to warranty them, but I saw mountains of angry comments from people that paid out of pocket for an engine replacement for their practically new Hyundai/Kia. Even today they're dragging their feet and telling owners not to park their Theta II powered vehicle in their garage because of the fire risk. 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, HondaHawkGT said:

 

Hyundai denied warranty coverage for years and thousands of people were stuck with the bill on Theta II engine failures. Maybe they recently began to warranty them, but I saw mountains of angry comments from people that paid out of pocket for an engine replacement for their practically new Hyundai/Kia. Even today they're dragging their feet and telling owners not to park their Theta II powered vehicle in their garage because of the fire risk. 

I’ve owned 4, an 05 and 11 still. Hyundai basic warranty is 5-60 bumper to bumper, power train 10-100K. I had only 1 claim on the 11. The radio gps backup camera. It was replaced no problem. Although I never had a engine problem, I seriously doubt they would turn down an engine problem within the warranty period. I did hear about an engine recall on certain 4cylinders engines. I would have to assume that’s after the 10-100K period. That to me would be unusual and unprecedented. 

Edited by KARNUT
Posted

When the sun goes down - the issues are in the manufacturing of the lifters themselves. Most of the failures are in the DOD lifters (the GenV small block has actually three different lifters in it - cylinders of 1,2,7 & 8 use a traditional roller style hydraulic lifter, cylinders 3,4,5 & 6 use lifters that bleed down when the DOD system is activated, and there is a solid lifter used on the high pressure fuel pump (that is the one that makes all the noise BTW).

The DOD lifters fail when they bleed down all their oil when the DOD is active, and when the system shuts off and it is time for them to fill back with oil, the pistons inside bind and dont fill with oil all the way, leading to large amounts of valve lash.

Now the traditional lifters are basically the same lifters GM has used all the way thru the LS engine which had its known issues with lifters. When they fail, it was due to too tight of tolerance between the pistons and bores, where the lifters essentially go to a solid lifter. They end up tearing up the cam and or pushrods.

In all honestly things like the oil you run, maintenance interval, etc.. will not make up for these issues. The GM lifters are known to just have a high failure rate. High enough that on the high end engines like the LT5 and COPO engines they use aftermarket (Johnson) lifters.

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...